It isnt. A reconstruction must have a purpose...none has been put forward...it must have a point.....so your criticism is invalid and should at least have a caveat...imo......thats my opinion
I find the fact that they say they talked uphill of the gate, and they were walking toward each other one walking toward the upper road and the other walking toward the tapas entrance and they meet. That to me is a physical impossibility so I want to see it done in a re-enactment to find out how it was done. To see if one or more was telling a lie.
G-unit found a solution and that was Gerry came out front door, and walked from the top road down hill, but then why was Jez saying he thought Gerry came out of side gate, and in the second statement even Gerry says he left via the side gate. Ok it would seem more reasonable to have them meeting where Jane said she saw them, but then Jez could never be right about being able to recognise someone on the top road. And then that doesn't explain why the Agreed timeline said they met uphill of the gate.
None of this explains why Gerry and Jez didn't see Jane.
It has me totally stumped.
Which bit of this puzzle comes first?