Has support for the McCanns and Goncalo Amaral reached cult status?

[stephen25000]

And to boot the complaint about breaking judicial secrecy made years ago by the mccanns pt lawyer was chucked out of court so seems doubly bizarre to focus on this now imo which makes me think...well, not sure tbh

 &%+((£
 

It does beggar belief.

[ferryman]

Err,  I thought the complaint here was about GA breachng it by his book publishing, pt police breaking judicial secrecy with press leaks is a whole different ballgame and a whole new thread

Just seen this is the cult thread, we do all get muddled but such is life suppose, sometimes off topic has no meanng as its all intertwined tis it not?
Lol

Eta btw your third and fourth paras have no connect in logic or the argument, you will have to spell it out especially as it zero to do with the writ

Nothing muddled.

The quirk (in Portuguese law) seems to be that because Amaral quit the PJ there is no legal bar on him breaching judicial secrecy.

As far as I'm aware, it's not disputed that he breached judicial secrecy.

[stephen25000]

Nothing muddled.

The quirk (in Portuguese law) seems to be that because Amaral quit the PJ there is no legal bar on him breaching judicial secrecy.

As far as I'm aware, it's not disputed that he breached judicial secrecy.

Yet again, the material was in the public arena.

[ShiningInLuz]

Beware breaching the forum rules on libel.

[mercury]

Nothing muddled.

The quirk (in Portuguese law) seems to be that because Amaral quit the PJ there is no legal bar on him breaching judicial secrecy.

As far as I'm aware, it's not disputed that he breached judicial secrecy.

Well it is muddled Im afraid,as youre moving the goalposts so quickly and surreptitiously I cant keep up, so will leave you to it, or else youre confused yourself

[mercury]

Where did alices post go? I was about to read and then by magic it had vaporised....

[stephen25000]

I believe we know the answer to that one.

[Alice Purjorick]

The semantically accurate description of what Amaral's book does.

Why do you have a problem with that?

Why would I have a problem with it ?
I know neither Sr Amaral nor the McCanns.
I just am amazed at people getting in a muck sweat about things they have not a hope in hell of changing, wondering when they will realise same ..............
Then of course there is the psychological thingy of why people seemingly imagine they are part of some extended family of those they support;  hurt my extended family hurt me form a laager .........................
Cue abuse from supporters. A bit like wasps really.

[mercury]

I believe we know the answer to that one.

Oh - ah yea, just seen......Off to read my readers digest special on helicopters, so excited, laters

[ferryman]

Why would I have a problem with it ?
I know neither Sr Amaral nor the McCanns.
I just am amazed at people getting in a muck sweat about things they have not a hope in hell of changing, wondering when they will realise same ..............
Then of course there is the psychological thingy of why people seemingly imagine they are part of some extended family of those they support;  hurt my extended family hurt me form a laager .........................
Cue abuse from supporters. A bit like wasps really.

Do you not get a sense of moral outrage at injustice?

Do you perceive injustice?

[Mr Gray]

Why would I have a problem with it ?
I know neither Sr Amaral nor the McCanns.
I just am amazed at people getting in a muck sweat about things they have not a hope in hell of changing, wondering when they will realise same ..............
Then of course there is the psychological thingy of why people seemingly imagine they are part of some extended family of those they support;  hurt my extended family hurt me form a laager .........................
Cue abuse from supporters. A bit like wasps really.

The only poster on here who gets into a muck sweat...posting in capital letters and getting quite exited...is not a supporter

[stephen25000]

I see Sharon Osbourne on her talk show in America has lambasted the McCann's.

Excellent.

That report is in the Mirror.

[mercury]

I see Sharon Osbourne on her talk show in America has lambasted the McCann's.

Excellent.

That report is in the Mirror.

Just came across that, oh my

Goodnght and

bzzzz


Lol

[Miss Taken Identity]

Why would I have a problem with it ?
I know neither Sr Amaral nor the McCanns.
I just am amazed at people getting in a muck sweat about things they have not a hope in hell of changing, wondering when they will realise same ..............
Then of course there is the psychological thingy of why people seemingly imagine they are part of some extended family of those they support;  hurt my extended family hurt me form a laager .........................
Cue abuse from supporters. A bit like wasps really.

Agreed! I will never understand this or the 'luvvies' perceived 'power and influence' at trying to convince us their word has more weight than anyone elses.  weird phenomenon.

[Alice Purjorick]

Do you not get a sense of moral outrage at injustice?

Do you perceive injustice?

I don't see McCann v Amaral as anything to have moral outrage over. It seems to me to be two deeply entrenched parties neither of which will be satisfied until it has destroyed the other. Hardly a worthy cause to support on either side in my estimation.