It's lazy journalism, Mercury. See post #59 for original Sun article. Star reporter has just omitted chunks of it which makes their article erroneous.
It
is the STAR, Misty.
If you know about the Madeleine and Joana cases it is easy enough to interpret. I don't think there is any intention to impugn Mr Amaral or to suggest he had anything to do with the post PJ career that Cristivao is alleged to have been involved in and for which he is being tried.
Just lazy cut and paste work.
Perhaps the journalist should have had his sentences ... "Paulo Pereira Cristovao, a pal of disgraced ex PJ detective Goncalo Amaral ... " and "Pereira Cristovao, who left the PJ after a torture trial Amaral was also implicated in ... " a bit closer to his concluding sentence ... "Pal Goncalo Amaral, who recently overturned a libel damages ruling over his best-selling book The Truth of The Lie which the McCanns are appealing, was found guilty of falsifying evidence in the same case." ... without all the chit chat in between.
That would have avoided any confusion about which case was being referred to.