Author Topic: Vincent Tabak and the Murder of Joanna Yeates  (Read 53033 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stephanie

Re: Vincent Tabak and the Murder of Joanna Yeates
« Reply #1530 on: October 07, 2018, 09:10:13 AM »
I hate to disappoint you but I didnt have a plan.  If something that I dont like is put to me then I will respond. I didnt expect or want you to be involved in Tabak's case just pointing out your selective answering and points that you make while trying to attack anyone with a point!

I have to say your points are far more enjoyable when you are talking about possible miscarriage of justices cases than people who you used to know. My view, dont expect you to agree again of course!

It was good to debate the Tabak case with you for a while... normal service resumed  8**8:/:

 *%87

Reminds me of the double bind tactic  8((()*/
« Last Edit: October 07, 2018, 09:23:25 AM by Stephanie »
"When flying monkeys come calling, just click your ruby slippers together and remember that even narcs can be defeated once you know the truth"

Offline jixy

Re: Vincent Tabak and the Murder of Joanna Yeates
« Reply #1531 on: October 07, 2018, 10:24:24 AM »
make of if what you want. you talk in riddles which is fun for you. Im glad its fun for you. I was talking about Tabak a guilty man who killed a young woman...It was never about you though your view on the case did raise some valid points.

This thread isnt about me. Think over time ive said all there is to say on Tabak Nine will battle on im sure
why use 5 words when 50 will do :)

Offline Nine

Re: Vincent Tabak and the Murder of Joanna Yeates
« Reply #1532 on: October 07, 2018, 10:40:18 AM »
*%87

Reminds me of the double bind tactic  8((()*/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_bind

Yes.... That what has been happening on here all the time,... I thought i was losing the plot...

Offline Stephanie

Re: Vincent Tabak and the Murder of Joanna Yeates
« Reply #1533 on: October 07, 2018, 04:57:50 PM »
Dr Vincent Tabak was a extremely competent computer user, more than competent, he had an understanding that is greater than most people, the pic i've attached shows Dr Vincent Tabaks Qualifications and Computer skills..

Under Activities it describes that Dr Vincent tabak: Programming Active Server Pages (ASP)

(Did you understand that, because I didn't)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Server_Pages

http://www.criminal-lawyer.org.uk/39-CLN-JAN-2012.pdf

I don't understand why his Lawyer didn't direct the Jury as to Dr Vincent Tabaks knowledge of Computing and his ability to program computer, Dr Tabak Mentions Computer Science.

So..Why didn't he show them what Asp programming was, why didn't he show the Jury Computer Script, most wouldn't be able to understand it, but it would have created doubt as to why Someone who is so computer literate would leave damning evidence on his computer, or just get rid of the hard drive.

Why Not?  He helped the Prosecution

Had the Jury know of Dr Vincent Tabaks abilities they might have found the Prosecutions claim difficult to believe...

If he is computer literate and had Committed this crime before he went to Holland, why didn't he take the hard drive with him, dump it somewhere.
(Apparently he was clever enough to dump a pizza and sock)

He clearly has a great understanding and education in Computing and would be extremly aware of what could be perceived as damaging evidence against him..
 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/nov/02/vincent-tabak-trial-tweeted

So did the computer evidence show Intention?

Because that was the only EVIDENCE they had as a way to persuade the JURY that Dr Vincent Tabak intended to murder...

If he Intended to Murder someone that evening, why didn't he just walk the streets?

He had been out earlier... He had a keen Interest in Photography..

Why Didn't his Defence mention Dr Vincent Tabak had opportunity that evening to MURDER anyone!!

If searches cannot prove intent,.. How could the Prosecution have proven Dr Vincent Tabak Intended to do anything

Like I originally posted.. when I saw Dr Vincent Tabak on the stand, I saw a man just going through the motion's..

A man that was not being defended.... A man that could see his Defence was not trying to help him,(IMO) was not challenging anything that the Prosecution placed in front of a JURY..

He just sat there as this supposed Evidence was being piled upon him..

So I can clearly understand Dr Vincent Tabak sobbing in court.. He knew the situation was hopeless, because nobody was there to help him..


No Character Witness's called to testify to his nature
No Tanja Morson called to testify to their relationship or Dr Vincent Tabak's behaviour.
No Christopher Jefferies to say whether or not he had indeed seen Dr Vincent Tabak that evening or moved the car.
No Family to testify what A loving son he is and they couldn't understand him being charged.
No employer to testify as to his Character.
No friends to testify to any knowledge they had good/or bad
Even his Lawyer had nothing good to say about him...
That's when I thought his Goose was cooked, If Your Lawyer is against you.. You must be Guilty.. (IMO)

No Neighbours who knew him to say:http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2011/10/28/joanna-yeates-murder-tria_n_1063591.html

Infact he didn't have anything going for him...

Because people wanted him to be the Monster..

And if you call that a fair Trial.... In My Opinion It isn't..

Though our country prided itself on being Fair Open and Honest..

In My Opinion this Trial was far from being a FAIR FIGHT...

You clearly weren't in court because if you were you wouldn't be suggesting fake news exists in this case

Moreover, psychopaths are very adept at imitating emotions such as remorse or guilt in the courtroom if they believe it will mitigate their punishment.[/i]
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/wicked-deeds/201605/understanding-psychopathic-criminals

"The parents of landscape architect Joanna Yeates have come face to face for the first time in court with their daughter's killer.

David and Teresa Yeates were at Bristol crown court for a pre-trial hearing for Vincent Tabak. The couple have not seen Tabak in person in court before as the defendant has appeared by video link from prison at the previous hearings they attended.

The couple arrived and left court hand in hand, accompanied by two police officers.

Tabak, a Dutch engineer, has admitted the manslaughter of Yeates, 25, but denies her murder. The charge states that Tabak "unlawfully killed" Miss Yeates between December 16 and December 19.

Four security guards escorted Tabak into the dock of courtroom six. The greying 33-year-old wore glasses, a white shirt, blue tie and dark suit for the 30-minute hearing before Judge Martin Picton.

Yeates's parents sat in the second row of the public gallery and Mrs Yeates occasionally looked over her shoulder towards Tabak.

Detective Chief Inspector Phil Jones, who led the Avon and Somerset investigation, sat behind the barristers and immediately in front of the defendant.

Tabak, who sat hunched in the dock, spoke only once. The clerk asked him: "Are you Vincent Tabak?" He replied: "Yes I am."

The hearing was being held to finalise arrangements for the four-week trial, which is due to begin on October 4 before Mr Justice Field.

The case was adjourned until the trial and Tabak was remanded into custody. Miss Yeates, who lived in Clifton, Bristol, disappeared on December 17 after going for Christmas drinks with colleagues.

Her body was found on a verge in a lane in Failand, north Somerset, on Christmas Day
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/sep/20/joanna-yeates-vincent-tabak-trial

« Last Edit: October 07, 2018, 05:04:36 PM by Stephanie »
"When flying monkeys come calling, just click your ruby slippers together and remember that even narcs can be defeated once you know the truth"

Offline jixy

Re: Vincent Tabak and the Murder of Joanna Yeates
« Reply #1534 on: October 08, 2018, 09:45:56 AM »
BS aside, what to you think causes people like Nine to persist in their erroneous beliefs regarding Tabaks confession?

i really dont know... as i have said before I cant knock her dedication though I will never understand it
why use 5 words when 50 will do :)

Offline Stephanie

Re: Vincent Tabak and the Murder of Joanna Yeates
« Reply #1535 on: October 19, 2018, 08:15:04 PM »
There are many people who have falsely confessed to a crime they haven't committed.

Who are the "many people" you refer to? And did they confess on the stand at trial like Tabak?

What case is comparable to this one?

I've no idea who has been putting ideas into your head and where your conspiracy theories stemmed from?

Though I think it would be helpful to you if you could attempt to unravel where it all began and what set you off on this path?
« Last Edit: October 19, 2018, 08:32:55 PM by Stephanie »
"When flying monkeys come calling, just click your ruby slippers together and remember that even narcs can be defeated once you know the truth"