McCanns' Embedded Confessions - Statement Analysis ( Richard D Hall release)

[pathfinder73]

McCanns interview with SIC, 09 March 2010

Don't you fear if the case is reopened you might be considered suspects again?

KM: It's never even crossed my mind.

SIC: Do you consider the posibility of, errm... Madeleine not being alive?

KM: Well, obviously there's a possibility because we don't know, errm... you know, we're not gonna sit here and lie and be totally naive and say: "She's 100% alive" but we do know there's a very good chance she's alive and while that chance is there we have to keep looking for her. We owe that... we all owe that to Madeleine; she's a little girl, you know, and we know from other cases, you know, there's a chance she's alive, so you have to keep going.

[Robittybob1]

What was your point Pathfinder?
3 years later! 

[pathfinder73]

Friday, December 9, 2016
Interview Analysis: Kate McCann

BBC "Women's Hour"  Jenny Murray interviews Kate McCann   9 AUGUST 2007

http://statement-analysis.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2016-01-01T00:00:00-05:00&updated-max=2017-01-01T00:00:00-05:00&max-results=50

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/01/2007_32_wed.shtml

[Robittybob1]

Friday, December 9, 2016
Interview Analysis: Kate McCann

BBC "Women's Hour"  Jenny Murray interviews Kate McCann   9 AUGUST 2007

http://statement-analysis.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2016-01-01T00:00:00-05:00&updated-max=2017-01-01T00:00:00-05:00&max-results=50

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/01/2007_32_wed.shtml

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01ld3tf  i was able to get this one going.

Where it says "Listen to this item" can you get that to work?  It says I need a special program to run it.

[Robittybob1]

Could you give me the exact title that works on the BBC search engine please.  Was it "Jenny Murray interviews Kate McCann" that gave no results.

Maybe you spelt it wrong "Jenni Murray interviews Kate McCann"?
result for both "Sorry, there are no programmes with titles containing Jenni Murray interviews Kate McCann ."

[Robittybob1]

Friday, December 9, 2016
Interview Analysis: Kate McCann

BBC "Women's Hour"  Jenny Murray interviews Kate McCann   9 AUGUST 2007

http://statement-analysis.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2016-01-01T00:00:00-05:00&updated-max=2017-01-01T00:00:00-05:00&max-results=50

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/01/2007_32_wed.shtml

But how do you know that is not how Kate normally talks? 

[Robittybob1]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNI5up44Nho
What does she say wrong in her Oprah interview?

[Eleanor]

Is there any possibility that you could answer some of your own questions?

[Robittybob1]

Is there any possibility that you could answer some of your own questions?

I was seeing if Stephen has any heart at all.

[Robittybob1]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNI5up44Nho
What does she say wrong in her Oprah interview?

Absolutely nothing.

[sadie]

What was your point Pathfinder?
3 years later!

I dont think that you were looking at the case then, Rob, but even 3 or 4 years after Madeleine vanished some were still saying .... "Fancy, how terrible, on that program the Mccanns smiled"

Some only wanted the Mccanns to be showing desperate pain all the time.  They were not allowed to be normal and smile every now and again.

Idiots.

[sadie]

Perhaps you should study some cases where the actual guilty party or parties have tried through various means to divert an investigation.

By the way, was the £100,000 , the Mccann's own money or had it been part of the donations to them ?

As far as I have heard, the Mccann's have never spent a penny from their own resources to 'search' for their daughter. Perhaps you can prove me wrong.

P.S. I don't count any money obtained from the book. That should have never been required in the first place, if they had done their jobs as parents properly.

AIMHO of course.

They have spent plenty of their own money as you must by now know.  It has beenn gone over several times on this forum withy you present

They spent the money that came in for THEM from the libel cases.
They spent the money from Kates book

And it is my bet that they spent any moneys coming to them from TV interviews.  Anyone know?


I should darn well hope that they didn't spend any other of their money on such necessities as getting proper bona fide translations done. 

Are you trying to bankrupt them and deprive the twins of a normal lifestyle, stephen?

[sadie]

Could you give me the exact title that works on the BBC search engine please.  Was it "Jenny Murray interviews Kate McCann" that gave no results.

Maybe you spelt it wrong "Jenni Murray interviews Kate McCann"?
result for both "Sorry, there are no programmes with titles containing Jenni Murray interviews Kate McCann ."

I echo that.  Can we see exactly what you are talking about Pfinder?   

TY.

[sadie]

I won't matter if it is political or not, the decision, whatever it is, will stand.

And that's the problem in a (cleverly disguised) still totalitarian state.

The baddy boys at the top support the other baddy boys at the top.


Ordinary Joe Bloggs doesn't get a look in.

[Robittybob1]

And that's the problem in a (cleverly disguised) still totalitarian state.

The baddy boys at the top support the other baddy boys at the top.


Ordinary Joe Bloggs doesn't get a look in.

The baddy boys at the top support the other baddy boys at the top.  And those baddy boys have baddy boys under them at infinitum.
A bit like dogs with fleas.

"So nat'ralists observe, a flea
Has smaller fleas that on him prey;
And these have smaller fleas to bite 'em.
And so proceeds Ad infinitum."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_infinitum