McCanns' Embedded Confessions - Statement Analysis ( Richard D Hall release)

[ferryman]

you should be ashamed of yourself for continually attacking parents who have lost a child. Almost ten years now a nd you and others still criticising....totally abnormal behaviour imo

Yes ....

[Mr Gray]

Errr we are not 'benefiting' from it at all, sorry. The translation the McCanns alledgedly paid for was not made available to the public. The same goes for the official translation that Operation Grange ordered and paid for. Out of UK taxpayers pockets.
With all these FOI requests flying around it keeps surprising me nobody asks for those translations to be made public.
It would put all this mistranslation-humbug to rest. All imo of course.

you shoulld realise it is only a tiny few online who still attack the Mccanns. nothing could stop their crusade. SY has said teh Mccanns are not suspects but they wont accept that. Why should the Mccanns bother with a small group of............
use any word you wish

[sadie]

you shoulld realise it is only a tiny few online who still attack the Mccanns. nothing could stop their crusade. SY has said teh Mccanns are not suspects but they wont accept that. Why should the Mccanns bother with a small group of............
use any word you wish

Ooo..er   Are you sure we can use any word we wish ?   

[ferryman]

Errr we are not 'benefiting' from it at all, sorry. The translation the McCanns alledgedly paid for was not made available to the public. The same goes for the official translation that Operation Grange ordered and paid for. Out of UK taxpayers pockets.
With all these FOI requests flying around it keeps surprising me nobody asks for those translations to be made public.
It would put all this mistranslation-humbug to rest. All imo of course.

What on earth are you on about?

None of the stuff on-line should ever have gotten on line.  Somewhere in the files is a very angry letter written by lawyers protesting at the way information was released into the public domain.

Kate, in her book, made no more than a handful of references from the file.

Swann and Sumer were similarly mindful of the restraints and observed them.  Their book might have had much greater punch if they hadn't been so scrupulous. 

[stephen25000]

What I find particularly obnoxious is those people who defend the mccanns, knowing full well no one else is responsible for this case occurring, and likewise supporting parents who have made money from the disappearance of one of their children.

So how can one describe such people other than being complete ar######s.

[ferryman]

What I find particularly obnoxious is those people who defend the mccanns, knowing full well no one else is responsible for this case occurring, and likewise supporting parents who have made money from the disappearance of one of their children.

So how can one describe such people other than being complete ar######s.

Mirror, mirror, on the wall

Who's the most complete ar######s.

Of them all ....

[stephen25000]

Mirror, mirror, on the wall

Who's the most complete ar######s.

Of them all ....

Do you have a mirror nearby. *&*%£

[ferryman]

Do you have a mirror nearby. *&*%£

it doesn't show your reflection.

[stephen25000]

it doesn't show your reflection.

I wasn't talking about mine.

You really never learn, do you.

[Alice Purjorick]

Blimey! 24 hour licensing has a lot to answer for.
Is it a case of "in vino veritas" or the lager boys have been at the "Wifebeater" * a bit early.

* a.k.a Stella's Tortoise; before some one three sheets to wind misconstrues and goes off on one........

[Eleanor]

Okay, cut the personal insults, please  You all know what will happen.

[ShiningInLuz]

What on earth are you on about?

None of the stuff on-line should ever have gotten on line.  Somewhere in the files is a very angry letter written by lawyers protesting at the way information was released into the public domain.

Kate, in her book, made no more than a handful of references from the file.

Swann and Sumer were similarly mindful of the restraints and observed them.  Their book might have had much greater punch if they hadn't been so scrupulous.

Do you have a cite for the bolded bit?

I'm interested because if one did not have access to the PJ Files (unless involved in the incident), any book written or interview conducted is likely to be tripe.  Equally, why are the PJ Files permitted to remain on-line?

[ferryman]

Do you have a cite for the bolded bit?

I'm interested because if one did not have access to the PJ Files (unless involved in the incident), any book written or interview conducted is likely to be tripe.  Equally, why are the PJ Files permitted to remain on-line?

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/LAWYERS_UK_POLICE.htm

Two paragraphs from the (long) letter:

To be added to the contents of I, expressed above, it should be taken into account that there are a set of legal measures in the UK destined to protect individual rights, for example, The Human Rights Act 1989 (entered into force in the UK following the European Convention on Human Rights), The Data Protection Act 1984, Regulation of Investigative Powers Act 2000 and legislation concerning common rights in the UK which recognises that in a large diversity of cases, there are obligations on the part of the state authorities to intervene in a coherent form with respect to the protection of individual rights.

It should be noted that the divulgation of the above-mentioned elements would most probably affect legal and international police cooperation in the future within the domain of complex criminal investigations, therefore putting into question the execution of Portuguese Justice.

[Alice Purjorick]

Do you have a cite for the bolded bit?

I'm interested because if one did not have access to the PJ Files (unless involved in the incident), any book written or interview conducted is likely to be tripe.  Equally, why are the PJ Files permitted to remain on-line?

It would certainly be interesting to read the response from the Ministry Of Justice. I am sure a Portuguese advogado would make "go sit on a sharp stick" sound very impressive in legalese.

[ferryman]

It would certainly be interesting to read the response from the Ministry Of Justice. I am sure a Portuguese advogado would make "go sit on a sharp stick" sound very impressive in legalese.

It was always the condition, on the British side, of their participation in a joint investigation, that the protocols of English law in releasing information into the public domain be observed.

The way the (joint) second investigation is being conducted is exactly the way the first investigation ought to have been conducted.