Kate McCann: I believe kidnapper drugged my twins night Madeleine was taken.

[faithlilly]

Amaral's theory was neither plausible nor logical.  You are welcome to post me your theory by PM if you're scared of committing libel on the board.

Rebelo also questioned the parents and their friend's part in Madeleine's disappearance.

[Alfie]

Oh look, 3 ad hom posts in a row from my little fan club.  Actually, I'm not remotely interested in "entrapping" anyone, only of exposing the paucity of your arguments.  Lucky for you guys you are able to hide behind the skirts of the libel rules on this forum to prevent you having to face reality.  The reality is there is no logical and plausible theory of parental involvement.

[Alfie]

Rebelo also questioned the parents and their friend's part in Madeleine's disappearance.

What was his theory then?

[faithlilly]

Oh look, 3 ad hom posts in a row from my little fan club.  Actually, I'm not remotely interested in "entrapping" anyone, only of exposing the paucity of your arguments.  Lucky for you guys you are able to hide behind the skirts of the libel rules on this forum to prevent you having to face reality.  The reality is there is no logical and plausible theory of parental involvement.

And you sit on this forum almost 24/7 to tell us so  ( when do you get any work done Alfie? )

[faithlilly]

What was his theory then?

From his request to have the McCanns and their friends reconstruct certain parts of the 3rd of May he certainly had not ruled out their involvement.

[Alfie]

And you sit on this forum almost 24/7 to tell us so  ( when do you get any work done Alfie? )

Oh look, a 4th Ad hom, I must be hitting a nerve... 

[Alice Purjorick]

Oh look, a 4th Ad hom, I must be hitting a nerve... 

There is an alternative.

[ShiningInLuz]

Amaral's theory was neither plausible nor logical.  You are welcome to post me your theory by PM if you're scared of committing libel on the board.

Your opinion of Amaral's theory is precisely that, your opinion.

We have been through this loop before.

I have no intention of PMing you with anything.

You are proposing a bog-standard creativity test used by each of the 3 FTSE 100 companies who employed me.  'Team, think of as many ways as you can that ...'.  A creativity test is not subject to rules of evidence.  Libel is.

I do not have the evidence to prove exactly what happened.  It would seem that OG, you and everyone else is in the same boat.

Otherwise the perpetrator would have been nabbed by Britain's finest.  Surely?

[Robittybob1]

Here is an interesting piece of research dome by G-unit.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7878.msg377317#msg377317
"It would be interesting to know who had hay fever and why they were using a remedy that was only available on a 'named patient' basis.

terfenadine is only available in the UK on a named-patient basis through specialist importers. There are no longer any licensed preparations containing terfenadine available in the UK (November 2005)
http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=-1576665050

 unlicensed medicines can be imported/used in the UK for the ‘special needs’ of an individual
doctor’s patient. This is known as ‘named patient’ supply. Unlicensed medicines can only be prescribed
by physicians if they are satisfied that there are no suitable licensed alternatives.
http://www.durbinglobal.com/assets/files/Imports/Unlicensedmeds.pdf

Before Madeleine's disappearance, I had only consulted Kate McCann once and never had assisted Gerry, nor ever had reason to deal with the twins Sean and Amelie
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/RICHARD_SCHOFIELD.htm

Their doctor of 14 months doesn't mentioned prescribing it for Madeleine, but then he doesn't mention if he ever saw Madeleine at all."

[barrier]

Your opinion of Amaral's theory is precisely that, your opinion.

We have been through this loop before.

I have no intention of PMing you with anything.

You are proposing a bog-standard creativity test used by each of the 3 FTSE 100 companies who employed me.  'Team, think of as many ways as you can that ...'.  A creativity test is not subject to rules of evidence.  Libel is.

I do not have the evidence to prove exactly what happened.  It would seem that OG, you and everyone else is in the same boat.

Otherwise the perpetrator would have been nabbed by Britain's finest.  Surely?

You have hit the nail squarely on the head there,if the telling piece of evidence that leads to any one in relation to the disappearance,just happens to not exist whether by accident or design then there will be no resolution any time soon.
But saying that £12+ million and 5 yrs must count for something when just £1 million brings an end to current investigation into the disappearance in the Claudia Lawrence case.

[sadie]

You have hit the nail squarely on the head there,if the telling piece of evidence that leads to any one in relation to the disappearance,just happens to not exist whether by accident or design then there will be no resolution any time soon.
But saying that £12+ million and 5 yrs must count for something when just £1 million brings an end to current investigation into the disappearance in the Claudia Lawrence case.

Have you considered that the reason for all this searching is

1)  That they think they know who took Madeleine ... but no clues to Claudias disappearance?
2)  And that maybe there is a big international group of traffickers behind Madeleines disappearace ... and they are prepared to put the effort in to nail them and hopefully stop them for ever?

Trouble is that The Phoenix always rises again.   Even Harry Potter knows that, thanks to Dumbledore 
I think JK Rowling knows a thing or two about the Phoenicians   

[barrier]

The only ones to mention any thing about any traffickers is the press,OG rightly so aren't telling any one any thing.
Have a good look at the last bit of crap news,a glaring piece of journalism in there.

[Mr Gray]

Your opinion of Amaral's theory is precisely that, your opinion.

We have been through this loop before.

I have no intention of PMing you with anything.

You are proposing a bog-standard creativity test used by each of the 3 FTSE 100 companies who employed me.  'Team, think of as many ways as you can that ...'.  A creativity test is not subject to rules of evidence.  Libel is.

I do not have the evidence to prove exactly what happened.  It would seem that OG, you and everyone else is in the same boat.

Otherwise the perpetrator would have been nabbed by Britain's finest.  Surely?

support for amaral from you as expected...a convicted criminal and a book written based on his inability to understand teh evidence

[Mr Gray]

You have hit the nail squarely on the head there,if the telling piece of evidence that leads to any one in relation to the disappearance,just happens to not exist whether by accident or design then there will be no resolution any time soon.
But saying that £12+ million and 5 yrs must count for something when just £1 million brings an end to current investigation into the disappearance in the Claudia Lawrence case.

the reason 12 mill has been spent is simply down to the amount of evidence taht has had to be analysed....thats all

[ShiningInLuz]

support for amaral from you as expected...a convicted criminal and a book written based on his inability to understand teh evidence

Are you accidentally or deliberately misconstruing what I wrote?