Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 298659 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1335 on: February 09, 2017, 08:50:45 AM »
perhaps because the public aren't too bright. .......the way things are going their could be another libel action against uk papers

The family of ben  Needham have never been cleared and they were suspects originally


no ...you think they are not too bright ...........what they was .......is starved of any info regarding the mccs....

a lot of the public thought the mccs were cleared.......now they know they are not...

those who thought the abduction was the only scenario..............know now its not....

you should be pleased .GA.............. had the opportunity to carry on

as now we have the bigger picture ................to get to the truth of what happened to maddie

because as yet ......we don't know ..do we .
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1336 on: February 09, 2017, 08:52:30 AM »
No they won't.


oh yes they will .................
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1337 on: February 09, 2017, 08:53:23 AM »
Robert Murat's lawyer seemed well aware of the nuances attached to the archiving process. When asked if they would welcome the archiving decision he said;

“Yes, we will, but it depends on the way it’s going to be dropped.
 
“If it’s going to be dropped because there’s not enough evidence connecting my client to this case or if it’s going to be dropped because Robert hasn’t got any involvement in this case.
 
“Only the second way will make us happy.
BBC News July 2008
http://madeleinemccann.org/blog/2014/04/20/case-to-be-archived/
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1338 on: February 09, 2017, 08:54:48 AM »

oh yes they will .................
They will be adding to the McCann fund if they do.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1339 on: February 09, 2017, 08:56:44 AM »
They will be adding to the McCann fund if they do.

Times have changed Rob.

Offline Benice

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1340 on: February 09, 2017, 08:57:27 AM »
right so the portugese consider the mcanns still suspects

Who do you mean by 'the portugese'  Carly?    The Portuguese people?  - or PJ?  or the Supreme court judges?

 Quote from the Sun article:-

The Supreme Court is Portugal’s highest court but has no criminal authority. It published its ruling yesterday.

Judges added their job was not to decide if the McCanns bore any criminal responsibility over Madeleine’s disappearance.

And they said it would be wrong to draw any inferences about the couple’s guilt or innocence from their ruling.
Unquote

You seem to have missed that last bit.



The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1341 on: February 09, 2017, 08:57:42 AM »
They will be adding to the McCann fund if they do.

In your dreams.  Media will be very careful to check  before printing stuff like this.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1342 on: February 09, 2017, 09:01:27 AM »
In your dreams.  Media will be very careful to check  before printing stuff like this.
I was commenting on Xtina's ....."the UK news papers are reporting .....

i always thought ........once they get there teeth into something ..that won't bite them back ...

they will be down on the mccs like a avalanche."
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1343 on: February 09, 2017, 09:01:48 AM »
They will be adding to the McCann fund if they do.


no no no no......they will do it all for free ..

as they are doing now .....they are only reporting the truth .... 8((()*/
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1344 on: February 09, 2017, 09:02:26 AM »

no no no no......they will do it all for free ..

as they are doing now .....they are only reporting the truth .... 8((()*/

it  appears the uk medias gloves are off

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1345 on: February 09, 2017, 09:03:00 AM »
Who do you mean by 'the portugese'  Carly?    The Portuguese people?  - or PJ?  or the Supreme court judges?

 Quote from the Sun article:-

The Supreme Court is Portugal’s highest court but has no criminal authority. It published its ruling yesterday.

Judges added their job was not to decide if the McCanns bore any criminal responsibility over Madeleine’s disappearance.



And they said it would be wrong to draw any inferences about the couple’s guilt or innocence from their ruling.
Unquote

You seem to have missed that last bit.


We know Benice.

People can read, and the parts you don't want to refer to as well.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1346 on: February 09, 2017, 09:06:21 AM »
You seem to have missed that last bit

Which bit ?

I've read the translated sections.

How about you ?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1347 on: February 09, 2017, 09:07:29 AM »

We know Benice.

People can read, and the parts you don't want to refer to as well.
You reading between the lines or reading things into it are you?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline xtina

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1348 on: February 09, 2017, 09:08:30 AM »
I was commenting on Xtina's ....."the UK news papers are reporting .....

i always thought ........once they get there teeth into something ..that won't bite them back ...

they will be down on the mccs like a avalanche."


well its not going to bite them back........ is it fgs......

they are not doing the mccs any favors ..are they .........

especially will make sure won't be adding to the fund....

Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1349 on: February 09, 2017, 09:09:08 AM »
You reading between the lines or reading things into it are you?

Hardly.

The Mccann's have said for years the archiving report cleared them.

That was a falsehood.