Portugal Supreme Court: The McCanns are not cleared in Maddie Case

[stephen25000]

in 10 years the daily mail has never had this headline have they??

It is unprecedented.

[Robittybob1]

What does that mean ?

It seems that if the Mccanns had a strong alibi that might be considered proof of innocence, but when a parent goes to check on their kids alone, that moment is an unsupported alibi OK it is for a few minutes at the most, but do they really think it is possible to commit the crime in those time intervals?

in 10 years the daily mail has never had this headline have they??

It doesn't actually mean anything.

It is unprecedented.

Because it is meaningless.

[carlymichelle]

  davel thinks alot of things are  meaningless  too are you brothers??

[stephen25000]

It seems that if the Mccanns had a strong alibi that might be considered proof of innocence, but when a parent goes to check on their kids alone, that moment is an unsupported alibi OK it is for a few minutes at the most, but do they really think it is possible to commit the crime in those time intervals?
It doesn't actually mean anything.Because it is meaningless.

You mean, in your meaningless opinion, I presume ?

[Robittybob1]

You mean, in your meaningless opinion, I presume ?

A meaningless presumption too.

[stephen25000]

A meaningless presumption too.

An erroneous judgement.

Do you seriously imagine that the Mail would run with this headline, if they still feared litigation from the Mccann's ?

[Robittybob1]

An erroneous judgement.

Do you seriously imagine that the Mail would run with this headline, if they still feared litigation from the Mccann's ?

There is nothing damaging in the headline, as I said it is meaningless.

[carlymichelle]

An erroneous judgement.

Do you seriously imagine that the Mail would run with this headline, if they still feared litigation from the Mccann's ?

  well the mcanns dont  exactly have money to sue them anymore do they??

[stephen25000]

There is nothing damaging in the headline, as I said it is meaningless.

Of course it is damaging.

Can't you read ?

[carlymichelle]

Of course it is damaging.

Can't you read ?

the uk media are saying maddie is dead??     that is more then damaging to the mcanns imo

[Robittybob1]

Of course it is damaging.

Can't you read ?

Where did the SC report say Madeleine was dead? 

[Eleanor]

From a moderation point of view while saying that the Court has said that they were not declared innocent is ok, there is no suggestion of guilt involved and any such suggestion will be suitably moderated.

Plus one.

[Robittybob1]

the uk media are saying maddie is dead??     that is more then damaging to the mcanns imo

It was Amaral's opinion MM was dead.  But there is no proof.  So his opinion is not fact.

[stephen25000]

It was Amaral's opinion MM was dead.  But there is no proof.  So his opinion is not fact.

Her fate has not been legally determined.

[carlymichelle]

rob can you grasp that the daily mail  put  a  headline saying that maddie is  dead??  and they are  talking about  amarals   opinion i dont think you   realise how big that  is