Author Topic: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?  (Read 54673 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #90 on: February 13, 2017, 01:56:36 AM »
One said she was cold the other said she was hot. If you can't see the contradiction between them then that's fine with me. I know what I think.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #91 on: February 13, 2017, 02:01:15 AM »
One said she was cold the other said she was hot. If you can't see the contradiction between them then that's fine with me. I know what I think.
One parent might looked at her and thought she was hot and the other touches her and thought her skin felt cold.  It happens.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2017, 06:36:27 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #92 on: February 13, 2017, 11:35:00 AM »
She didn't say she touched to check, she said she was under the covers. Let's stick to the statements. The timeline now goes back a short time to the next contradictions.

"After the children's bath, already alone, she put pyjamas and nappies on the twins, gave them each a glass of milk and biscuits. Before bathing the children and because it was early, they had thought of taking them to the recreation area, but then decided against this because of tiredness......... Close to 6:00PM Gerry went to the tennis courts, soon after the children had finished their bath."

"After showering, at around 6:30/6:40PM and while she was getting dry, she heard somebody knocking at the veranda door. She wrapped herself in a towel and went to see who it was. This door was closed but not locked as Gerry had left by this door. She confirmed it was David Payne, because he called out and had opened the door slightly. David's visit was to help her to take the children to the recreation area." http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATE-MCCANN_ARGUIDO.htm

"During the afternoon of that day the rest of the group members, including the children, were at the beach, [they] having returned at 18H30, the time at which he saw DAVID next to the tennis court. DAVID went to visit KATE and the children and returned close to 19H00."  http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm

Kate might be needing help to look after the three children, because they intended to bring them to the recreation area after their showers. He thinks that David offered to check if Kate needed help, which he did, and returned minutes later. http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-ARGUIDO.htm

"The three children were all you know dressed you know in their pyjamas, you know they looked immaculate, you know they were just like angels, they all looked so happy and well looked after and content."

00:41:00 1485 "Okay, so now what I'm gonna try and ask you to recollect, what everybody was wearing.'

 Reply "I'm afraid that is, you know I'm, I cannot recall at all. I know that's, you'd think that'd be an obvious thing to remember, I cannot remember. As I say the, from the children point of view predominantly I can remember the, you know, white, but I couldn't say exactly what they were wearing. Err''

 1485 "But could you remember what Kate was wearing for example''

 Reply "I can't, no.'

 http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/DAVID-PAYNE-ROGATORY.htm

Kate and the kids, I think, as I said earlier, weren't there and, you know, they, as Gerry said, were just absolutely knackered and Kate was getting them bathed and ready for bed. http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/FIONA-PAYNE-ROGATORY.htm
« Last Edit: February 13, 2017, 03:11:26 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #93 on: February 13, 2017, 03:09:02 PM »
if you can see serious errors in there just explain it please?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #94 on: February 13, 2017, 03:32:50 PM »
Who has deleted my response?
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #95 on: February 13, 2017, 03:36:50 PM »
Who has deleted my response?
You may not have posted it properly.  This site does that sometimes.  It times out.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #96 on: February 13, 2017, 07:01:44 PM »
It was deleted and a mod was viewing the thread when it went so I don't think I'm allowed to point out more contradictions here  8(0(* 
« Last Edit: February 13, 2017, 07:03:52 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #97 on: February 13, 2017, 09:19:14 PM »
It was deleted and a mod was viewing the thread when it went so I don't think I'm allowed to point out more contradictions here  8(0(*
Try again for they are interesting and very innocuous.  Did they involve David?  I know they are super touchy about his name.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #98 on: February 14, 2017, 10:33:54 AM »
If witnesses cannot agree then there's an important reason for the anomalies. You find the reason to uncover the truth. Repeating 'No Comment' don't cut it nor help but it makes you more suspected.

Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #99 on: February 14, 2017, 10:37:38 AM »
If witnesses cannot agree then there's an important reason for the anomalies. You find the reason to uncover the truth. Repeating 'No Comment' don't cut it nor help but it makes you more suspected.
Maybe but it is safe for you are not going to make stupid mistakes if all you say is no comment.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2017, 11:00:19 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #100 on: February 14, 2017, 11:31:18 AM »
Maybe but it is safe for you are not going to make stupid mistakes if all you say is no comment.

Are you suggesting Kate might have made a stupid mistake? Oh dear.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #101 on: February 14, 2017, 11:36:16 AM »
Are you suggesting Kate might have made a stupid mistake? Oh dear.

That is not what Robby's comment says.

Offline jassi

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #102 on: February 14, 2017, 11:40:09 AM »
Sounds very much like it to me
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Eleanor

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #103 on: February 14, 2017, 11:48:58 AM »
Sounds very much like it to me

Then there is something wrong with your comprehension of the English Language.  Try reading it slowly.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #104 on: February 14, 2017, 11:57:56 AM »
Maybe but it is safe for you are not going to make stupid mistakes if all you say is no comment.

That is largely gibberish.

Can you please re-type that, with punctuation ?