So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?

[Alfie]

So he has.  Sometimes he struggles with copy and paste but not this time.

Cheeky booger.

[Alfie]

She disappeared so why should disappearance not be used?

But they are clear they are investigating 'the abduction'.

The parents are off limits.  There is no other interpretation.

So are you telling me that if when reviewing all the information or if when re-interviewing witnesses, or if someone "cracked" and divulged some incriminating information about the parents, that the Met would not investigate these leads any further as the parents are "off limits"?  Do you actually believe this?

[Mr Gray]

As I said, the McCanns are off limits.

that isnt what you said....you said....The remit says the McCanns are off limits.

The remit says no such thing and you are wrong. You are stating your biased interpretation as fact...it isnt.

SY are investigating an abduction......do you really believe that if during this investigation evidence came to light that implicated the McCanns that they would not be investigated and regarded as "off limits". That is plainly ridiculous

[ShiningInLuz]

So are you telling me that if when reviewing all the information or if when re-interviewing witnesses, or if someone "cracked" and divulged some incriminating information about the parents, that the Met would not investigate these leads any further as the parents are "off limits"?  Do you actually believe this?

Yes.

There is no reason to believe that with the parents off limits they are permitted to be investigated.  They are off limits, as per the remit.

[Mr Gray]

Yes.

There is no reason to believe that with the parents off limits they are permitted to be investigated.  They are off limits, as per the remit.

mis read your post...you are not back pedalling you actually believe this..

so what do you think SY would do if evidence came to light that implicated the mccanns....do you think they would ignore it....or hide it....absolutely barmy

[Robittybob1]

mis read your post...you are not back pedalling you actually believe this..

so what do you think SY would do if evidence came to light that implicated the mccanns....do you think they would ignore it....or hide it....absolutely barmy

You're pretty quick at that sport as well!

[Mr Gray]

You're pretty quick at that sport as well!

you would have to back that up...and i would say youre not much good at that...prove me wrong..

sils idea is bonkers

and dont steal my jokes...you are allowed to use them...and you will...but not on this forum

[Robittybob1]

you would have to back that up...and i would say youre not much good at that...prove me wrong..

sils idea is bonkers

and dont steal my jokes...you are allowed to use them...and you will...but not on this forum

Look up at the posts above.  One post you accuse SIL of saying one thing, and 2 posts later you back track.
I'm not picking on you, I just found it ironic that that sequence happened.

[Mr Gray]

Look up at the posts above.  One post you accuse SIL of saying one thing, and 2 posts later you back track.
I'm not picking on you, I just found it ironic that that sequence happened.

you are wrong...


sil originally said the remit said the mccanns are off limits...she then changed it to ...she said the mcccanns are off limits.....thats backtracking and sloppy....something you cannot accuse me of

so which is it

the remit says the mccanns are off limits...no it doesnt

or sil says the mccanns are off limits...yes she does...and shes wrong

[Alfie]

Yes.

There is no reason to believe that with the parents off limits they are permitted to be investigated.  They are off limits, as per the remit.

Wow, I never figured you for a conspiracy nut.

[ShiningInLuz]

Wow, I never figured you for a conspiracy nut.

I never figured you as something that be good in rabbit pie.

[Alfie]

I never figured you as something that be good in rabbit pie.

Hmmm....so do tell me why you think the Met would be prepared to "look the other way" in the event of incriminating material surfacing on the McCanns?  Please?

[ShiningInLuz]

Hmmm....so do tell me why you think the Met would be prepared to "look the other way" in the event of incriminating material surfacing on the McCanns?  Please?

What incriminating evidence would surface about anyone that OG was not investigating?

The McCanns are off limits, as certain supporters are keen to repeatedly tell us.

[Robittybob1]

Wow, I never figured you for a conspiracy nut.

SIL are you a conspiracy nut?

[Alfie]

What incriminating evidence would surface about anyone that OG was not investigating?

The McCanns are off limits, as certain supporters are keen to repeatedly tell us.

who knows? It could be anything. A new witness coming forward for example.  Someone who was part of the group " coming clean". But you're telling us that the Met would simply send them packing because the parents are off limits?