Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"

[Robittybob1]

On 12/9/2013 he had not read the complete files.

GP – Did you have access to the criminal process?
DE answers that he read parts of the files in the translation that the McCanns asked to be done.
GP – How did you manage to conduct an investigation without analysing all the process? Whom did you contact in Portugal?
DE says he contacted an informant who passed information to both the UK and Portuguese authorities. He doesn't want to say to whom he spoke, but says he spoke to someone from the PJ.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2301.0

May have been enough to start an investigation.

[Alfie]

I don't despise Edgar I just despair at his lack of judgement.

An investigator who will agree to investigate a case even though he is aware that's he doesn't have access to all the available information  does not deserve mine, or your, respect or attention. If he was willing to tackle such a complex case in this way calling him dense is probably the most charitable description available.

You say he is trying to help but when he could actually physically do something to take the case forward by investigating the Barcelona sighting he did nothing and was roundly criticised for it.

What's your opinion of Sonia Poulton, Pat Brown, Pathfinder and all the other online 'warriors of justice' who think they have solved this case with access only to the files?  Presumably you have little respect for them either and believe them to be dense too!

[Alfie]

So, according to you, Edgar is speaking out because it's the tenth anniversary of Madeleine's disappearance. So why not speak out on the 5th, 6th.....anniversary? Did she need to be found any less than now? And the baby buyer and Joseph Fritzl-like keeper of the dungeon Edgar at one point thought Madeleine was in? What of them now?

And as for making himself look stupid, that certainly doesn't seem to bother him. Lest we forget ' Madeleine's abductor may be a woman' and 'I've only seen the files given to me by the parents'. This man obviously cares little for his dignity.

Yes, I think you'll find that the tenth anniversary means there will be more media coverage and more interviews with more people connected with this case than there were for the 5th and 6th anniversary - why do you find that remotely surprising? 

I don't think Edgar has said anything remotely stupid, contentious, undignified or undermining in his recent interview, despite all your hot air and faux indignation on the matter.  Do us all a favour and use the tenth anniversary as a good excuse to dial down the contempt for any and all individuals who have ever said a supportive word for the McCanns - would that be possible?

[stephen25000]

Yes, I think you'll find that the tenth anniversary means there will be more media coverage and more interviews with more people connected with this case than there were for the 5th and 6th anniversary - why do you find that remotely surprising? 

I don't think Edgar has said anything remotely stupid, contentious, undignified or undermining in his recent interview, despite all your hot air and faux indignation on the matter.  Do us all a favour and use the tenth anniversary as a good excuse to dial down the contempt for any and all individuals who have ever said a supportive word for the McCanns - would that be possible?

'...I don't think Edgar has said anything remotely stupid, contentious, undignified or undermining in his recent interview, ..'

 Is this April the 1 st ?

[Alfie]

'...I don't think Edgar has said anything remotely stupid, contentious, undignified or undermining in his recent interview, ..'

 Is this April the 1 st ?

I extracted all the quotes from Edgar's recent interview and posted them on this tread, a couple of pages back - have a read and tell me which ones are 1) stupid 2) contentious 3) undignified and 4) undermining.  Much obliged.

[stephen25000]

I extracted all the quotes from Edgar's recent interview and posted them on this tread, a couple of pages back - have a read and tell me which ones are 1) stupid 2) contentious 3) undignified and 4) undermining.  Much obliged.

What has he said, that he hasn't already said before.

He had his chance , a few years ago, with Cowley and achieved nothing.

The fiasco with the Beckham lookalike amply demonstrated the caliber of the man.

The 'lawless village 10 miles from PDL'.


He hasn't a clue what happened to Madeleine.

[Eleanor]

I extracted all the quotes from Edgar's recent interview and posted them on this tread, a couple of pages back - have a read and tell me which ones are 1) stupid 2) contentious 3) undignified and 4) undermining.  Much obliged.

I think you might be whistling in the wind there.

[stephen25000]

I think you might be whistling in the wind there.

That Eleanor is precisely what Edgar is doing.

[Robittybob1]

That Eleanor is precisely what Edgar is doing.

And who would know being the expert on these things.

[Eleanor]

That Eleanor is precisely what Edgar is doing.

You can't know that, Stephen.

[Alice Purjorick]

On 12/9/2013 he had not read the complete files.

GP – Did you have access to the criminal process?
DE answers that he read parts of the files in the translation that the McCanns asked to be done.
GP – How did you manage to conduct an investigation without analysing all the process? Whom did you contact in Portugal?
DE says he contacted an informant who passed information to both the UK and Portuguese authorities. He doesn't want to say to whom he spoke, but says he spoke to someone from the PJ.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2301.0

Nuff said really!
There is bit more in here though: http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id362.htm
After passing the files to The Met in 2011 and by implication to the Portuguese six years later it could be reasonably concluded there were no significant leads in the files as Madeleine McCann remains missing and no one has been charged let alone banged up for it.
Footnte Alphaig Ltd was dissolved 2011/2012 ish according to Companies House.

[stephen25000]

And who would know being the expert on these things.

Edgar is an expert in this case ?

[Robittybob1]

Edgar is an expert in this case ?

He has more experience in investigations than you or I.

[stephen25000]

He has more experience in investigations than you or I.

.and what did he find on his previous incursion into this case ?

[Robittybob1]

.and what did he find on his previous incursion into this case ?

I was meaning his previous employment (job history).  I'm not a cop, are you?