Author Topic: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"  (Read 129624 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #825 on: April 15, 2017, 10:22:44 PM »
Both dogs are deployed to detect forensically recoverable evidence... Martin Grime

Please don't do this.  It is not necessary.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #826 on: April 16, 2017, 02:06:58 AM »

So where would she be if alive ?

Now that is the question no McCann supporter seems to want to answer.

Yet they pursue it IMO , to protect the Mccanns.
On planet Earth provided she hasn't been abducted by aliens.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #827 on: April 16, 2017, 02:15:28 AM »
The question has been answered and is extremely basic
I have already answered it tonight...
keela was deployed to find blood from a living or deceased person
So ducked the question again.... absolute rubbish I have already given the same answer tonight
The question was why was Keela deployed in Luz?

To jog your memory, Keela was deployed around 3 months after Madeleine disappeared.  Was she deployed to search for a live Madeleine. Or was she deployed to check along with Eddie for a cadaver?

Hint - the dogs did not go to Portugal for cheap alcohol, for a sun tan, or for a holiday.  Another hint - they were not used to find living people.
What's up, old man?

Offline John

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #828 on: April 16, 2017, 02:34:09 AM »
The question was why was Keela deployed in Luz?

To jog your memory, Keela was deployed around 3 months after Madeleine disappeared.  Was she deployed to search for a live Madeleine. Or was she deployed to check along with Eddie for a cadaver?

Hint - the dogs did not go to Portugal for cheap alcohol, for a sun tan, or for a holiday.  Another hint - they were not used to find living people.

And it is probably worth pointing out that had the English police not been involved in the enquiry, Eddie and Keela would not have been deployed.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Brietta

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #829 on: April 16, 2017, 02:34:30 AM »
The question was why was Keela deployed in Luz?

To jog your memory, Keela was deployed around 3 months after Madeleine disappeared.  Was she deployed to search for a live Madeleine. Or was she deployed to check along with Eddie for a cadaver?

Hint - the dogs did not go to Portugal for cheap alcohol, for a sun tan, or for a holiday.  Another hint - they were not used to find living people.

Keela would most likely be as disinterested in a living person as she would be in a dead one.  Neither category was within her training parameters.
Her sole use was to detect dried blood.  She wasn't fussy if the blood came from the quick or the dead ... just so long as it was blood.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #830 on: April 16, 2017, 02:48:42 AM »
This is bullshit.  The McCanns were always liable to return to Portugal, albeit with some dissent.  But it would always have happened If there had been any evidence.

You are now getting silly.

I have to tell you that I would defend France with my dying breath, but not ever for this shite.  Sometimes you have to remember what sort of Justice you want.
Kate's book said they were planning to leave.

p232 "We'd waited almost 4 weeks for these interviews and it was obvious they had been hastily arranged once Bob Small notified the PJ that we were leaving the country.  Otherwise, why now?  As far as we knew, they didn't have the forensics results back yet."

If you think it is bullshit, you need a cite.

Kate is clear about the sequence of events.  Supporters seem to find her sequence problematical.  For the life of me I cannot think why, given that it is the sequence in which things happened.
What's up, old man?

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #831 on: April 16, 2017, 03:12:04 AM »
Keela was deployed to identify the scent of blood ... nothing more nothing less.
Disingenuous, IMO.

Why fly out a person whose experience is finding traces of dead bodies, with one dog allegedly a cadaver dog, and the other trained to detect human blood if the aim in flying them out was to track a living person?  The dogs were not tracker dogs and were not deployed to conduct any form of tracking.

They were deployed to provide intelligence as to whether Madeleine was 'simply' vanished or worse.

One can debate until hell freezes over what the alerts indicated.  That is not the point under consideration.

Why were the dogs taken to Luz in the first place?  What was the entirely human reasoning for flying Grime, Keela and Eddie to Portugal?
What's up, old man?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #832 on: April 16, 2017, 03:41:53 AM »
On planet Earth provided she hasn't been abducted by aliens.

Really Rob.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #833 on: April 16, 2017, 04:20:43 AM »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Brietta

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #834 on: April 16, 2017, 05:19:48 AM »
Disingenuous, IMO.

Why fly out a person whose experience is finding traces of dead bodies, with one dog allegedly a cadaver dog, and the other trained to detect human blood if the aim in flying them out was to track a living person?  The dogs were not tracker dogs and were not deployed to conduct any form of tracking.

They were deployed to provide intelligence as to whether Madeleine was 'simply' vanished or worse.

One can debate until hell freezes over what the alerts indicated.  That is not the point under consideration.

Why were the dogs taken to Luz in the first place?  What was the entirely human reasoning for flying Grime, Keela and Eddie to Portugal?

In my opinion the Policia Judiciaria investigating team had chosen their culprit and were in the process of making the evidence fit the theory.
I think it may show how blinkered they were in their belief.

What they discovered was that building a substantive case requires the opposite approach to the one they had adopted ... which is following not the theory, but following the evidence.

The evidence did not validate the theory.  Yet here we are ten years down the line discussing a theory which had nothing to support it then and nothing to support it now.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #835 on: April 16, 2017, 06:05:55 AM »
Disingenuous, IMO.

Why fly out a person whose experience is finding traces of dead bodies, with one dog allegedly a cadaver dog, and the other trained to detect human blood if the aim in flying them out was to track a living person?  The dogs were not tracker dogs and were not deployed to conduct any form of tracking.

They were deployed to provide intelligence as to whether Madeleine was 'simply' vanished or worse.

One can debate until hell freezes over what the alerts indicated.  That is not the point under consideration.

Why were the dogs taken to Luz in the first place?  What was the entirely human reasoning for flying Grime, Keela and Eddie to Portugal?

It's in the files
Grime says he trains dogs to detect forensically recoverable evidence
The value of the dogs is in the evidence they recover
Keela detects blood

Offline G-Unit

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #836 on: April 16, 2017, 08:23:48 AM »
Kate's book said they were planning to leave.

p232 "We'd waited almost 4 weeks for these interviews and it was obvious they had been hastily arranged once Bob Small notified the PJ that we were leaving the country.  Otherwise, why now? As far as we knew, they didn't have the forensics results back yet."

If you think it is bullshit, you need a cite.

Kate is clear about the sequence of events.  Supporters seem to find her sequence problematical.  For the life of me I cannot think why, given that it is the sequence in which things happened.

23rd August;

In any case, as we were now being kept in the dark, we didn’t know much about it ourselves by this stage
[Madeleine]

Clearly the PJ had no intention of telling them anything, let alone if the forensic results were back. Was someone else keeping them informed?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #837 on: April 16, 2017, 09:31:46 AM »
Keela went to eliminate Eddies alerts in places where blood was found. Simple.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #838 on: April 16, 2017, 09:55:22 AM »
Keela went to eliminate Eddies alerts in places where blood was found. Simple.

No
If they both alert it could be blood and cadaver

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #839 on: April 16, 2017, 10:17:27 AM »
Keela went to eliminate Eddies alerts in places where blood was found. Simple.
Hard to change opinion?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.