I find the black stuff in the bathroom rather strange too, also the removal of the front door, and the examination of windows.
It has never been suggested that Joanna died in the bathroom, or that her killer spent any time in there, so why have they concentrated on the bathroom?
I would like to know whether they found VT's fingerprints on the television remote control and on the oven, as, apparently he admitted to having turned both off. And, nobody ever said what was actually found on that front door.
In fact, I would like to know if they found ANY forensic evidence pointing to VT having been in Joanna's flat, or any evidence of Joanna having been in his flat. He pleaded guilty to manslaughter, and virtually the whole world believes in his plea, but after the plea came his story: that he killed Joanna in her flat, and then took the body to his flat, also that he returned to her flat and turned off the oven and the TV. If he was telling the truth, there would have been oodles of forensic evidence all over both flats. It is clear, from Greg's testimony in court, that the flat was not cleaned up: he said he came home and found a mess.
If VT killed Joanna and then dumped her body, he and his clothes would have been filthy, and full of forensic evidence. His enhanced statement did not mention that he took a shower and changed his clothes. Why not?
When he went to meet Tanja, was he wearing different clothes than the ones he wore to ASDA? Was he wearing a different coat? Did he put the washing machine on? Was his coat mucky? Did he visit the dry cleaner the following day? Tanja could have testified and given the court the answers, but she was never asked. Why not? These seem to be the obvious questions to ask.
