The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?

[Aunt Agatha]

With close friends and family members who are Masons, I can't accept your denigration of them. We all know that there are rotten apples in every barrel/walk of life. NO organization is free of them. I don't accept there are more within Masons' ranks than in any other. "Old boys" networks are found everywhere. We all enjoy "mates' rates". I see nothing wrong with putting in a good word/having a good word put in. It's what happens in ALL 'clubs'. People  point others in the right direction. Having said all of that, where is the proof, other than from Jeremy's mouth, that Nevill was ever a member of that organization you claim to be behind the murders?

I'm talking higher ranks... Not your friends April.  We're talking 30 degree plus.

[Common sense]

JM wasn't there she was in London. 

JB had a different girlfriend pre and post murders neither of which had anything adverse to say about JB. I would suggest the only reason JM did is that DS Jones threatened to throw the book at her if she didn't cooperate.  This was a young woman, just turned 21 yoa, who was holed up in a police training room for days on end prevented from having any contact with the outside world, not even a solicitor or her mother.

She was there at the end of the phone Holly.She knows what Bamber said and what he had been saying for 18 months.

The rest is pure hogwash. What would DS Jones have thrown the book at her for if she hadn't told him everything in the first place? How many other people did she confide in before going to the police, was it 5?  Do you think that maybe something was on her mind that became increasingly difficult to deal with as the scales fell from her eyes?

I am biased when it comes to Julie though, she is utterly gorgeous in those pictures of her in 2002

[Aunt Agatha]

She was there at the end of the phone Holly.She knows what Bamber said and what he had been saying for 18 months.

The rest is pure hogwash. What would DS Jones have thrown the book at her for if she hadn't told him everything in the first place? How many other people did she confide in before going to the police, was it 5?  Do you think that maybe something was on her mind that became increasingly difficult to deal with as the scales fell from her eyes?

I am biased when it comes to Julie though, she is utterly gorgeous in those pictures of her in 2002

Based on that last statement you should start a Campaign..

'Julie Mugford is Innocent'   

[Myster]

Mark Newby isn't that bad either, with big broad shoulders for Holly to climb on.  Shame about the tiny todger though...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q14h6Fts25k

[Aunt Agatha]

Mark Newby isn't that bad either, with big broad shoulders for Holly to climb on.  Shame about the tiny todger though...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q14h6Fts25k

Wow! Who is this guy??? 

[APRIL]

You need to read my post Very Carefully.

I have stated, he did not tell me this!
He was nervous about even discussing the idea.

It's what I believe happened. Me!

Did he never seek to disavow you of those beliefs, AA? A very good starting point would have been to tell you that Nevill wasn't a Mason. It seems to me that by his silence, he  allowed your belief to take hold. It may have suited him to do so.

[Common sense]

Did he never seek to disavow you of those beliefs, AA? A very good starting point would have been to tell you that Nevill wasn't a Mason. It seems to me that by his silence, he  allowed your belief to take hold. It may have suited him to do so.

Lets face it, he doesn't try to disavow any of his supporters of other erroneous beliefs  ie; rabbits blood in silencer, Nevills call to the police, figure in the window etc..

[Nicholas]

I was not isolated with him.  He did not try and indoctrinate me or brainwash me. 

I've stated early, what I am suggesting happened is my own theory.  Not Jeremy's. He didn't suggest any of this to me. In fact, as I've stated earlier in my posts, he didn't want to discuss the idea and never has.

Suspect your theories didn’t suit him AA and those of whoever came along from the ‘CT’ did

[Aunt Agatha]

Did he never seek to disavow you of those beliefs, AA? A very good starting point would have been to tell you that Nevill wasn't a Mason. It seems to me that by his silence, he  allowed your belief to take hold. It may have suited him to do so.

Unbelievable.

We never sat and discussed it because I don't think he had any idea of what his father could possibly have known.

It's not common knowledge. One had to go researching for this info, who all the local MP'S were, who held power in that area, who's now passed over and who is still alive.

We have some very well known names that I'm never going to mention on here, who have had some real power involved in this. 

[Nicholas]

We used to speak regularly on the phone and gave each other advice about things going on in our lives and I really valued her friendship. However about a year ago she stopped answering my calls and changed her phone number. I feel hurt and would just like to know what I have done to offend her.

Why have you claimed AA changed her phone number ?

She didn’t

Hey Daisy,

I’ve not changed my number at all.   It’s still the same.  Call me when you get the chance.  Look forward to catching up with you. Xx

[APRIL]

Unbelievable.!

I'm not sure why you'd say that, AA. If you had a good friend who said something which could be of momentous importance, wouldn't you want to support them? On the other hand, if you believed it to be 'off the wall', possibly damaging, wouldn't you suggest that they had a rethink?

[Aunt Agatha]

Why have you claimed AA changed her phone number ?

She didn’t

A mistake was made, OK Nicholas. End of!!

[Nicholas]

Is Agatha related to the Brookside fanatic on Twitter who claims it was watching Brookside that sent Sheila mad?🤨


And what’s all this nonsense that Freemasons worship the devil? Agatha seems very strange 😳

Don’t think they are a Brookside fanatic , they’ve referred to Eastenders also

[Aunt Agatha]

I'm not sure why you'd say that, AA. If you had a good friend who said something which could be of momentous importance, wouldn't you want to support them? On the other hand, if you believed it to be 'off the wall', possibly damaging, wouldn't you suggest that they had a rethink?

Please go back to previous reply, I modified my answer. Thanks.

[Nicholas]

A mistake was made, OK Nicholas. End of!!

Was it