The use of the term 'abductor' should be qualified by caveat.

[Angelo222]

The Met have come to the conclusion that maddie was abducted...

why is it that posters never criticise amaral for making claims...particularly when he twists the meaning of the evidence to support his claims

If its anything like the Jill Dando case and their fitting up of Barry George for her murder then I wouldn't pay too much attention to anything that comes out of New Scotland Yard.

[ferryman]

They didn't know what crime, if any , had been committed.

That remains the case.

Even for Rowley.

IMHO obviously.

Sigh ....

The non involvement of the arguidos parents of Madeleine in any penally relevant action seems to result from the objective circumstances of them not being inside the apartment when she disappeared, from the normal behaviour that they adopted until said disappearance and afterwards, as can be amply concluded from the witness statements, from the telephone communications analysis and also from the forensics' conclusions, namely the Reports from the FSS and from the National Institute for Legal Medicine.

Got that?

Non-involvement of Kate and Gerry in any penally relevant activity.

Whatever else the Prosecutors were uncertain of, they were certain Kate and Gerry had no case to answer.

And said so.

[misty]

By beaming presumably.

It's not too far away, Stephen. Fact.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/659416/Scientists-make-TELEPORTATION-breakthrough-thanks-to-inspiring-Star-Trek

[Mr Gray]

If its anything like the Jill Dando case and their fitting up of Barry George for her murder then I wouldn't pay too much attention to anything that comes out of New Scotland Yard.

is Barry George innocent....cite

I dont just listen to what they say....I look at the evidence as well...and the evidence points to abduction

[Angelo222]

Not necessarily, if it were a case of child trafficking, then she could have passed through numerous hands prior to the ultimate situation she found herself in.

Given that Maddie's face is known to just about everyone in the civilised world, any innocent adoptive parent would need to be blind not to realise the situation before them so I would rank the possibity of her being adopted by some unsuspecting person as just about nil.

[stephen25000]

It's not too far away, Stephen. Fact.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/659416/Scientists-make-TELEPORTATION-breakthrough-thanks-to-inspiring-Star-Trek

Quoting the Express, is not always a good idea.

It has a history of poor predictions.

[Angelo222]

is Barry George innocent....cite

I dont just listen to what they say....I look at the evidence as well...and the evidence points to abduction

Has the record stuck?  You know damn well there is no evidence of any abduction so is this some strategy you have to push this notion??

[Mr Gray]

Has the record stuck?  What evidence?

again if you do not understand what evidenve SY used to rule out the mccanns then you dont undestand what evidence is

[Robittybob1]

They have presented nothing to indicate that an abductor is anything other than their opinion.

Their considered opinion mind you.

[jassi]

Given that Maddie's face is known to just about everyone in the civilised world, any innocent adoptive parent would need to be blind not to realise the situation before them so I would rank the possibity of her being adopted by some unsuspecting person as just about nil.

Is that the true image? Some images appear to have been 'enhanced', shall we say, so several years on, she could be unrecognisable.
This assumes that 1  she is alive  and 2 that she is living in a benign environment.

[Mr Gray]

Has the record stuck?  You know damn well there is no evidence of any abduction so is this some strategy you have to push this notion??

there is evidence by default...there are only  3 options...if you can rule out 2 it makes the third very likely...thats what I have been saying for several years and it seems SY agree with me

[Mr Gray]

They didn't know ferryman what happened.

No evidence.

That is why the case was shelved.

Anyone reading the forum can find that out for themselves.

there is evidence in this case....only 3 options...if you can rule out 2 it makes the third very likely


your claim there is no evidence is stating your opion as fact

[G-Unit]

The Met have come to the conclusion that maddie was abducted...

why is it that posters never criticise amaral for making claims...particularly when he twists the meaning of the evidence to support his claims

The Met appear to be investigating abduction. Why they concluded that Madeleine was abducted is open to question. Amaral is criticised all the time, haven't you noticed?

[Robittybob1]

They didn't know ferryman what happened.

No evidence.

That is why the case was shelved.

Anyone reading the forum can find that out for themselves.

You need to use the words "No Evidence that they found" or even taking it further "no evidence that they admit to have found".  I'm sure the words "no evidence" needs to be followed by a very precise caveat too.

[misty]

The Met appear to be investigating abduction. Why they concluded that Madeleine was abducted is open to question. Amaral is criticised all the time, haven't you noticed?

References by Rowley & Do Carmo to Amaral were noticeable by their absence in the latest interviews.