CMTV Gonçalo Amaral - O Enigma - with English subtitles

[Erngath]

Is it against forum rules to say libel is accepted on this forum as long as it is anti mccann
That is a fact

This Amaral interview would never be allowed on TV  in this country. He it is posted on this forum.

[jassi]

This Amaral interview would never be allowed on TV  in this country. He it is posted on this forum.

You forgot to include one of theses -   


 

[stephen25000]

This Amaral interview would never be allowed on TV  in this country. He it is posted on this forum.

No one forced you to watch the video.

That was your choice.

[Brietta]

Reminder:  the thread topic is about Amaral and O Enigma ... if it doesn't interest please don't post.

[Mr Gray]

the video is plainly wrong...
to accuse someone of criminal behaviour without proof is clearly libellous and im surprised you do not realise that
to say he can prove maddie died in teh apartment when he cant is clearly misinfor,ation
to claim that teh dogs alerted to a cadaver when it ahs not been proved is misinformation
to say teh experts agree taht a cadaver had been in teh apartment is not true amd is misinformation
to say teh children were given calpol to help tehm sleep when it has not been proved is misinfformation
the video is an absolute disgrace

is amaral deliberately lying ...does he not understand the evidence ...or is there another expalnation...I cant see one and neither can anyone else

[G-Unit]

the video is plainly wrong...
to accuse someome of criminal behaviour without proof is clearly libellous and im surprised you do not realise that
to say he can prove maddie died in teh apartment when he cant is clearly misinfor,ation
to claim that teh dogs alerted to a cadaver when it ahs not been proved is misinformation
to say teh experts agree taht a cadaver had been in teh apartment is not true amd is misinformation
to say teh children were given calpol to help tehm sleep when it has not been proved is misinfformation
the video is an absolute disgrace

is amaral deliberately lying ...does he not understand the evidence ...or is there another expalnation...I cant see one and neither can anyone else

I have no problem with the word 'misinformation', it's disinformation I object to. You, to your credit, have accepted that he can't be accused of lying because it can't be proved. Others need to accept that also.

[Mr Gray]

I have no problem with the word 'misinformation', it's disinformation I object to. You, to your credit, have accepted that he can't be accused of lying because it can't be proved. Others need to accept that also.

So if we rule out lying we are left only with him not understanding the evidence
Unless you can think of something else

[Benice]

I have no problem with the word 'misinformation', it's disinformation I object to. You, to your credit, have accepted that he can't be accused of lying because it can't be proved. Others need to accept that also.

So you think Amaral's description of a witness as a sexual deviant, with a fetish for bathing children, and whose only reason for going to 5A was to bathe the McCann children, cannot be described as Amaral disseminating 'disinformation' on a massive scale -  even though it is grossly libelous and can be proved to be untrue via the PJ files.

Good grief.   

What does qualify as 'disinformation' IYO.

[stephen25000]

So you think Amaral's description of a witness as a sexual deviant, with a fetish for bathing children, and whose only reason for going to 5A was to bathe the McCann children, cannot be described as Amaral disseminating 'disinformation' on a massive scale -  even though it is grossly libelous and can be proved to be untrue via the PJ files.

Good grief.   

What does qualify as 'disinformation' IYO.

When does he say 'sexual deviant' ?

Speaking personally, why would you let someone else wash your own children, when you can do it yourself ?

[Mr Gray]

When does he say 'sexual deviant' ?

Speaking personally, why would you let someone else wash your own children, when you can do it yourself ?

Do you have a cite that he bathed any other children

[G-Unit]

So you think Amaral's description of a witness as a sexual deviant, with a fetish for bathing children, and whose only reason for going to 5A was to bathe the McCann children, cannot be described as Amaral disseminating 'disinformation' on a massive scale -  even though it is grossly libelous and can be proved to be untrue via the PJ files.

Good grief.   

What does qualify as 'disinformation' IYO.

Can you prove that Amaral knows what he says is untrue?
Can you prove that he is saying it with the deliberate intention of deceiving people?

If you can, then do so. If you can't then you can't accuse him of disinformation.

[stephen25000]

Do you have a cite that he bathed any other children

I wasn't referring to any other children.

Why are you ?

Would you have let another man bathe/wash your children  ?

[Erngath]

Can you prove that Amaral knows what he says is untrue?
Can you prove that he is saying it with the deliberate intention of deceiving people?

If you can, then do so. If you can't then you can't accuse him of disinformation.

Do you have any concerns about Amaral accusing a named person of having a fetish for bathing children ?

[stephen25000]

Do you have any concerns about Amaral accusing a named person of having a fetish for bathing children ?

I believe you have children Erngath.

Did you let them be washed by another adult ?

[Erngath]

I asked G Unit if she had any concerns about Amarals labelling, implying.stating that one of the witnesses had a fetish for bathing children and actually naming said person.