Was Mark Rowley wrong to claim that Madeleine McCann was abducted?

[Erngath]

No, fact.  He and SY have nothing to show for the £11 million, money which could have been better spent in London.

You do not know that for  a FACT.
So it is in your opinion.

Why London?

[G-Unit]

It's quite simple really. Anyone posting Amaral's theory as fact in the past would be sanctioned. The McCann's theory has been repeatedly posted as fact without being sanctioned. Neither theory has been proved to be correct so both should be discussed under the same rules.


 

[Mr Gray]

It's quite simple really. Anyone posting Amaral's theory as fact in the past would be sanctioned. The McCann's theory has been repeatedly posted as fact without being sanctioned. Neither theory has been proved to be correct so both should be discussed under the same rules.

amaral is fetaured on a video on this forum promoting his thoery as fact

[Angelo222]

You do not know that for  a FACT.
So it is in your opinion.

Why London?

I know they haven't a baldy clue where Madeleine is or how she got there but if you know different do feel free to educate us all.

[Erngath]

amaral is fetaured on a video on this forum promoting his thoery as fact

And no  "alledged" "seems to" or " "in my opinion" references used.

[Angelo222]

amaral is fetaured on a video on this forum promoting his thoery as fact

Its a video, you don't have to watch it.

You really are incorrigible, how could Amaral ever claim anything as fact when he opined several scenarios?   &%&£(+

[Mr Gray]

And no  "alledged" "seems to" or " "in my opinion" references used.

he actua;;y twice uses the words...of that we have no doubt

[stephen25000]

It's quite simple really. Anyone posting Amaral's theory as fact in the past would be sanctioned. The McCann's theory has been repeatedly posted as fact without being sanctioned. Neither theory has been proved to be correct so both should be discussed under the same rules.

That is a precise description of the situation

It would seem that some people are unhappy they can't type abduction as a fact, when it is abundantly clear that how she disappeared has not been determined.

[Erngath]

I know they haven't a baldy clue where Madeleine is or how she got there but if you know different do feel free to educate us all.

No sadly I  do not.
I was just questioning why you feel the money spent on investigating the abduction  of a little British girl would be better spent in London?? (all imop)

[Erngath]

he actua;;y twice uses the words...of that we have no doubt

Indeed.

[Angelo222]

Amaral is not a member of this forum so cannot post anything.  Take up your silly gripe with CMTV or YouTube.  We are not responsible for what anyone chooses to view.

[stephen25000]

No sadly I  do not.
I was just questioning why you feel the money spent on investigating the abduction  of a little British girl would be better spent in London?? (all imop)

Again a reminder, Erngath.

Do not state abduction as a fact

[Robittybob1]

But he is not a member so doesn't have to abide by the rules.

[Erngath]

Its a video, you don't have to watch it.

You really are incorrigible, how could Amaral ever claim anything as fact when he opined several scenarios?   &%&£(+

None of which are abduction.
Closed mind. (imo)

[barrier]

I know they haven't a baldy clue where Madeleine is or how she got there but if you know different do feel free to educate us all.

The one word by Rowley some seem to hang their coat on is abducted,whilst those that do seemingly ignore all others he uttered including no definitive evidence,evidence is limited at the moment to know which to be cast iron about which hypotheses we should follow.Its all here page three.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8138.30