Hi Davy, yes I understand your comments, I have been reading the case of the bloke who denied killing his wife, her body was never discovered, Sandra Lean was involved in protesting his innocence alongside His new girlfriend and the he admitted it!! I am not blinded by love and know Darren very well. I am mindful of the fact that someone lost their life here devastating a family, but Darren was not the gunman. The ID parade was always a sticking point but was hard to argue before a jury, it's never easy to suggest to a jury, some police are bent and corrupt, that can go down like a lead ball on, so the defence team had to tread carefully. When Darren gee sent the Xmas card stating the police told him what Darren was wearing, and then provided a statement to that effect, it all clicked into place. He actually said in his statement Darren Waterhouse was not the gunman, the gunman was now dead!! I have not put the whole case up, just snippets, otherwise it would become a book.

if you look after Craig's death, people were being killed pretty soon after, an underlined suggestion it was linked or acts of retribution. Darren gee is serving for murder, the other occupant mark Richardson also serving for murder for Mikey Wright, a name on the list supplied to police who was involved in the death of Craig. These " prosecution witness" were active in a huge way in the criminal world, mark Richardson is connected to Tony Richardson, who dated Jennifer Ellison, and had a huge contract on his head. This is all in the public domain. Why won't the CPS disclose the 999 call, I'm told its quite common in defence cases for these transcripts to be served, why not here? Raises the suspicion greatly, the police had lost control due to the high amount of shootings and I feel they just wanted to show they were in control and wrapped up the wrong person. Darren had extensive firearms expertise, travelled to Liverpool so must be him. Darren's co- d, john, pleaded, William I believe has now accepted his role in prison, Darren refuses to engage with the prison service on sentence planning meetings and still maintains his innocence. I've read on a campaign site it's worth writing to the local MP, I'm not sure if that will help but I guess if you don't ask.....if we don't try he will spend 30 years plus in jail, as he will never accept responsibility for this he will serve beyond his tariff.