I don't believe for a minute that this was down to one person Rob. IMO the tapas group would have discussed going back to Portugal among themselves to varying degrees and come up with an appropriate response.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/RE_ENACTMENT.htmIn the emails presented in the file she is the only one who definitely says she is not going.
"We gather that Rachel has already contacted you saying they won't be returning for any re-enactment. Once again, it seems an academic matter if there is not going to be 100% attendance."
"Dear Sir,
I write with reference to the Notification dated 9th May 2008, which I received on Saturday 17th May 2008.
I am hereby informing you that I will not be attending the proposed Reconstruction in Portugal on 29th and 30th May 2008. I have reached this decision after considering advice from our Lawyers.
Yours faithfully,
Rachael Marimma Jean Mampilly"
In this next bit it says they all have refused but I don't believe there are emails supporting that view.
"Prosecutor of the Republic
Portimao Circuit
CONCLUSION on 26-5-2008
As referred to by the despatch that ordered the Reconstruction, in spite of this being considered a very important diligence for the investigation, it would only take place if the witnesses who were notified were present as well as the arguidos who had expressed their availability to participate. The witnesses Russell O'Brien, Jane Tanner, Matthew Oldfield and Rachel Mampilly have informed the process that they will not attend, therefore the reconstruction has no sense."