TVI ordered to pay €20,000 to Robert Murat for calling him a "paedophile".

[Sunny]

i think you will find that posters here understand the landmarks in the case

I am sure they do Davel so why no criticism of Paulo Rebelo by name only Goncalo Amaral?

From my reading supporters posts on this forum so far you would think Goncalo Amaral was the only PJ officer involved in the case.

[jassi]

I am sure they do Davel so why no criticism of Paulo Rebelo by name only Goncalo Amaral?

From my reading supporters posts on this forum so far you would think Goncalo Amaral was the only PJ officer involved in the case.

Because he's evil. Evil I tell you and must be made to suffer 

[Erngath]

I am sure they do Davel so why no criticism of Paulo Rebelo by name only Goncalo Amaral?

From my reading supporters posts on this forum so far you would think Goncalo Amaral was the only PJ officer involved in the case.

Possibly because he is as yet the only P J officer who was involved in the investigation who has turned his thoughts on the case into a source of income.

[Mr Gray]

I am sure they do Davel so why no criticism of Paulo Rebelo by name only Goncalo Amaral?

From my reading supporters posts on this forum so far you would think Goncalo Amaral was the only PJ officer involved in the case.

rebelo has not written abook...or made a doc accusing the mccanns

[jassi]

Possibly because he is as yet the only P J officer who was involved in the investigation who has turned his thoughts on the case into a source of income.

What's wrong with that ?

[Erngath]

What's wrong with that ?

A great deal IMO
But obviously not IYO.

[Erngath]

Because he's evil. Evil I tell you and must be made to suffer 

Not evil.

[jassi]

A great deal IMO
But obviously not IYO.

Perhaps you could be a little more explicit

[Erngath]

Perhaps you could be a little more explicit

No.

[jassi]

No.

So just a case of it's wrong because I think it's wrong. Mmm.

[Erngath]

So just a case of it's wrong because I think it's wrong. Mmm.

No.

[Sunny]

Possibly because he is as yet the only P J officer who was involved in the investigation who has turned his thoughts on the case into a source of income.

Yet I gather some of the PJ officers supported Goncalo Amaral in the Lisbon trial.

Also so the only reason that Goncalo Amaral is wrong in pretty much everything he did according to the supporters is because he wrote a book on the case. Is that really why he comes in for so much abuse here and mores so, elsewhere?

[Mr Gray]

Yet I gather some of the PJ officers supported Goncalo Amaral in the Lisbon trial.

Also so the only reason that Goncalo Amaral is wrong in pretty much everything he did according to the supporters is because he wrote a book on the case. Is that really why he comes in for so much abuse here and mores so, elsewhere?

No..He's wrong because imo he mistunderdtood the evidence... There could be no complaint if his conclusion s were based on sound principles

[Sunny]

No..He's wrong because imo he mistunderdtood the evidence... There could be no complaint if his conclusion s were based on sound principles

Davel I was replying to Erngath's reasons not you.  However I don't believe you when you say what you have above because it would appear to me that whatever Goncalo Amaral did he comes in from criticism from supporters of the McCanns and from my research has done for over a decade.

[barrier]

No.. He's wrong because imo he mistunderdtood the evidence... There could be no complaint if his conclusion s were based on sound principles

Yet there was there was no mistrial or any one died because of this alleged misunderstanding, so what harm was done and why the continual complaints.