Author Topic: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?  (Read 7049 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Brietta

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #30 on: August 24, 2018, 04:07:29 AM »
I thought that was a good point.  If we can see traces of Luminol we might think we are approaching a crime scene.  So they must have thoroughly cleaned the apartment after the PJ left.
No doubt the dog could sense luminol.  How that alters Eddie's response is unknown.
I agree with G-Unit that the unnamed chemical used was probably Luminol.

We have only seen video of areas associated with McCann which makes it impossible to assess the dog's reaction on approach to other places ... but Martin Grime makes reference to the dog becoming excitable as he walked along the pathway to the door of 5A.
To the extent that he did not obey the 'sit' command prior to entry.  We saw it demonstrated in the garage sequence that he was trained to sit and then given the command to search.

We've seen the window which the dog had to pass covered in dragon's blood (fingerprint powder) precisely the area as noted by Martin Grime, where his intense interest began.
We have also seen his lengthy inspection of the apartment sniffing everywhere and anywhere before eventually barking.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #31 on: August 24, 2018, 05:10:44 AM »
What parts still covered in dragon blood 3 months later?
« Last Edit: August 24, 2018, 06:04:43 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Sunny

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #32 on: August 24, 2018, 06:26:10 AM »
I agree with G-Unit that the unnamed chemical used was probably Luminol.

We have only seen video of areas associated with McCann which makes it impossible to assess the dog's reaction on approach to other places ... but Martin Grime makes reference to the dog becoming excitable as he walked along the pathway to the door of 5A.
To the extent that he did not obey the 'sit' command prior to entry.  We saw it demonstrated in the garage sequence that he was trained to sit and then given the command to search.

We've seen the window which the dog had to pass covered in dragon's blood (fingerprint powder) precisely the area as noted by Martin Grime, where his intense interest began.
We have also seen his lengthy inspection of the apartment sniffing everywhere and anywhere before eventually barking.

Thank you for finding that information on Dragons blood Brietta. 

I can understand why the PJ didn't release videos of the dogs in the other apartments as they didn't alert to them so what would be the point from their point of view. However, from our point of view it probably would have been better to see the dogs behaviour and Martin Grime guiding them so that the questions some have asked, regarding his possible directing the dogs would be silenced or held up as correct. I believe that he was professional and did it correctly as he had been doing the job for years.

I also cannot see the use of chemicals affecting the dogs as they would have been used to searching crime scenes with forensic residue.  From what I have seen and read cadaver dogs with their incredible noses do not alert everywhere only in specific places which would indicate that the chemicals are irrelevant. 

All the above post is IMO.
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #33 on: August 24, 2018, 07:04:05 AM »
Thank you for finding that information on Dragons blood Brietta. 

I can understand why the PJ didn't release videos of the dogs in the other apartments as they didn't alert to them so what would be the point from their point of view. However, from our point of view it probably would have been better to see the dogs behaviour and Martin Grime guiding them so that the questions some have asked, regarding his possible directing the dogs would be silenced or held up as correct. I believe that he was professional and did it correctly as he had been doing the job for years.

I also cannot see the use of chemicals affecting the dogs as they would have been used to searching crime scenes with forensic residue.  From what I have seen and read cadaver dogs with their incredible noses do not alert everywhere only in specific places which would indicate that the chemicals are irrelevant. 

All the above post is IMO.
There is a full video showing the dogs in the other apartments. (well Eddie at least for I've never watched it all the way through).  I'll get the link for you.
https://youtu.be/c4NMYPsFKb8
« Last Edit: August 24, 2018, 07:12:48 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Sunny

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #34 on: August 24, 2018, 07:18:07 AM »
There is a full video showing the dogs in the other apartments. (well Eddie at least for I've never watched it all the way through).  I'll get the link for you.
https://youtu.be/c4NMYPsFKb8

Thank you so much Robittybob1, one for me to watch later as I am off to work in a moment.   There is so much to read and watch in the case. 8((()*/

Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #35 on: August 24, 2018, 07:26:12 AM »
Thank you so much Robittybob1, one for me to watch later as I am off to work in a moment.   There is so much to read and watch in the case. 8((()*/
And a one and a half hour video of a dog going here there and everywhere is particularly hard to watch.  I have not achieved it yet.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #36 on: August 24, 2018, 10:11:49 AM »
I agree with G-Unit that the unnamed chemical used was probably Luminol.

We have only seen video of areas associated with McCann which makes it impossible to assess the dog's reaction on approach to other places ... but Martin Grime makes reference to the dog becoming excitable as he walked along the pathway to the door of 5A.
To the extent that he did not obey the 'sit' command prior to entry.  We saw it demonstrated in the garage sequence that he was trained to sit and then given the command to search.

We've seen the window which the dog had to pass covered in dragon's blood (fingerprint powder) precisely the area as noted by Martin Grime, where his intense interest began.
We have also seen his lengthy inspection of the apartment sniffing everywhere and anywhere before eventually barking.

5A was the first location searched in Portugal. Perhaps that contributed to Eddie's excitement as he began to do his job. We don't know which areas of the apartment were sprayed with chemicals, nor do we know if any of them have been studied for their effects on the work of these dogs. Therefore we're really unable to reach any meaningful conclusions in my opinion.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2018, 10:18:52 AM by G-Unit »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #37 on: August 24, 2018, 10:16:17 AM »
Thank you for finding that information on Dragons blood Brietta. 

I can understand why the PJ didn't release videos of the dogs in the other apartments as they didn't alert to them so what would be the point from their point of view. However, from our point of view it probably would have been better to see the dogs behaviour and Martin Grime guiding them so that the questions some have asked, regarding his possible directing the dogs would be silenced or held up as correct. I believe that he was professional and did it correctly as he had been doing the job for years.

I also cannot see the use of chemicals affecting the dogs as they would have been used to searching crime scenes with forensic residue.  From what I have seen and read cadaver dogs with their incredible noses do not alert everywhere only in specific places which would indicate that the chemicals are irrelevant. 

All the above post is IMO.

The use of chemicals might not affect the alerts but might explain eddies alleged initial excitement when entering 5a

Offline Brietta

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #38 on: August 24, 2018, 10:36:00 AM »
Thank you for finding that information on Dragons blood Brietta. 

I can understand why the PJ didn't release videos of the dogs in the other apartments as they didn't alert to them so what would be the point from their point of view. However, from our point of view it probably would have been better to see the dogs behaviour and Martin Grime guiding them so that the questions some have asked, regarding his possible directing the dogs would be silenced or held up as correct. I believe that he was professional and did it correctly as he had been doing the job for years.

I also cannot see the use of chemicals affecting the dogs as they would have been used to searching crime scenes with forensic residue.  From what I have seen and read cadaver dogs with their incredible noses do not alert everywhere only in specific places which would indicate that the chemicals are irrelevant. 

All the above post is IMO.

That is precisely my point. That the dog was "used to searching crime scenes with forensic residue."

Eddie did not alert immediately but he did become exited by 'a scent he recognised' as he approached along the enclosed passageway outside the bedroom window ... we have watched the video and we have witnessed that.

The dog had primed itself for action in that passageway ... we have witnessed him straining at the lead in the video.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline kizzy

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #39 on: August 24, 2018, 10:42:53 AM »
The use of chemicals might not affect the alerts but might explain eddies alleged initial excitement when entering 5a


well you don't know do you so it is all just guess work.

It could go both ways [evidence could be missed] if that's the case imo

Offline Brietta

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #40 on: August 24, 2018, 10:43:52 AM »
5A was the first location searched in Portugal. Perhaps that contributed to Eddie's excitement as he began to do his job. We don't know which areas of the apartment were sprayed with chemicals, nor do we know if any of them have been studied for their effects on the work of these dogs. Therefore we're really unable to reach any meaningful conclusions in my opinion.

I have found a paper detailing scientific research regarding VRDs and such chemicals.  At he moment I can't make head nor tail of the information which is detailed and quite extensive ... when or if I do I will bring it to the forum.
Googling turns up a few references worth having  look at.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Erngath

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #41 on: August 24, 2018, 10:44:43 AM »

well you don't know do you so it is all just guess work.

It could go both ways [evidence could be missed] if that's the case imo

I agree.
Evidence of an abductor may have been missed.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline jassi

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #42 on: August 24, 2018, 10:46:27 AM »
No evidence is no evidence. Isn't that the argument used against the dog alerts?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Brietta

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #43 on: August 24, 2018, 10:58:33 AM »
NB the dog alerts at the hire car proved valid ... and did not substantiate police suspicions ... in fact, proper procedure in evidence gathering and subsequent forensic confirmation exonerated the McCanns.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2018, 04:27:18 PM by John »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Could the alerts in 5a have been caused by previous CSI chemicals?
« Reply #44 on: August 24, 2018, 11:01:17 AM »
No evidence is no evidence. Isn't that the argument used against the dog alerts?
No evidence is no evidence irrespective of what is being argued.  Enough deflection now ... back on topic please.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....