Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?

[faithlilly]

What do Carmo said suggests, indicates and supports that the parents are not suspects. Period. Anything else is your OPINION.

Your OPINION may be wrong, just as the McCanns discovered following a similar announcement in August 2007;

Kate and Gerry McCann have said they are "heartened" by an assurance from Portuguese police that they are not being considered suspects in the search for their missing daughter Madeleine.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1560117/McCanns-heartened-not-to-be-suspects.html

Yet we know from Kate’s own book that by the time this article was published they knew that they were suspects.

[ShiningInLuz]

I googled, nothing came up for this year.  I look forward to reading your blog where it will all be revealed.

What came up for previous years?

[Alice Purjorick]

Lowe was replying to a question...do the results show the presence of Maddie's DNA...the answer to that is that the results are inconclusive to that specific question...

The DNA results do not confirm the presence of Maddie's DNA...in that respect they are conclusive

I am certainly not mistaken..a glass can be half full and half empty at the same time...no contradiction

Wrong on all counts. Especially the first one. The statement I posted was from John Lowe's deposition/report as expert witness not in answer to any question. You seem to be posting something different.

A glass is always full; only the mixture of the fluid within varies.

[Mr Gray]

Wrong on all counts. Especially the first one. The statement I posted was from John Lowe's deposition/report as expert witness not in answer to any question. You seem to be posting something different.

A glass is always full; only the mixture of the fluid within varies.

If you read the statement it was in answer to a question....but perhaps you didn't notice


Everything I have said is 100% correct.

[Mr Gray]

The DNA could be from Madeleine so stop spreading myths. They were working from an incomplete DNA result!

"However, all of the confirmed DNA components within this result match the corresponding components in the DNA profile of Madeline McCann." https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JOHN_LOWE.htm

I'm not spreading any myths...the DNA is not confirmed as Maddie's as amaral and others here believe..the results were quite conclusive on that point

[Mr Gray]

Wrong on all counts. Especially the first one. The statement I posted was from John Lowe's deposition/report as expert witness not in answer to any question. You seem to be posting something different.

A glass is always full; only the mixture of the fluid within varies.

From Lowe's statement

Well lets look at the question that is being asked

"Is there DNA from Madeline on the swab "

Would you like to reconsider your claim that the response was not in response to a question...to reach the correct conclusion you need an eye for detail which I have and others lack .imo

[pathfinder73]

I'm not spreading any myths...the DNA is not confirmed as Maddie's as amaral and others here believe..the results were quite conclusive on that point

It is NOT conclusive that it wasn't Madeleine's DNA - you said it is conclusive! All of her components were still present in an INCOMPLETE result.

[Mr Gray]

It is NOT conclusive that it wasn't Madeleine's DNA - you said it is conclusive! All of her components were still present in an INCOMPLETE result.

You need to read my posts again...it is conclusive that the DNA is not confirmed as Maddie's..that is a fact

[Vertigo Swirl]

What came up for previous years?

What year should I be lookng for?

[Mr Gray]

I have just run a simple Google check on the Porto team and there is evidence of activity.

Don't ask me for a cite - do your own simple Google check.

Evidence of activity is in the present tense..you are now furiously back pedalling

[Mr Gray]

What do Carmo said suggests, indicates and supports that the parents are not suspects. Period. Anything else is your OPINION.

Your OPINION may be wrong, just as the McCanns discovered following a similar announcement in August 2007;

Kate and Gerry McCann have said they are "heartened" by an assurance from Portuguese police that they are not being considered suspects in the search for their missing daughter Madeleine.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1560117/McCanns-heartened-not-to-be-suspects.html

My opinion may be wrong...but the evidence suggests the McCann's are not suspects...there is no evidence against them and they are not being investigated...there is no evidence that they are being investigated

[G-Unit]

At what point will you accept that the McCanns are not police suspects in their child’s disappearance, if ever?

I have never denied what do Carmo said; the parents are not suspects. I have merely denied that that's 'police speak' which really means 'we are not investigating the McCanns' as Davel claimed.

[Mr Gray]

I have never denied what do Carmo said; the parents are not suspects. I have merely denied that that's 'police speak' which really means 'we are not investigating the McCanns' as Davel claimed.

If they are not suspects why would they be investigated

[faithlilly]

My opinion may be wrong...but the evidence suggests the McCann's are not suspects...there is no evidence against them and they are not being investigated...there is no evidence that they are being investigated

Rowley’s ‘ not suspects’ interview pulled from the internet. All mention of OG pulled from the Met’s website. Things are certainly moving.

[ShiningInLuz]

What year should I be lookng for?

Whichever year or years your search turned up.

To repeat.  What came up for previous years?