What of it? nothing much to write home about.
Don't know about that ... perhaps it is all in the understanding of exactly what it was that the Prosecutors concluded when dropping all legal restrictions against the chosen arguidos.
Madeleine McCann files: Portuguese prosecutors criticise policePortuguese prosecutors have fiercely criticised the country's police for failing to uncover any clues over Madeleine McCann's disappearance.
By Caroline Gammell in Portimao 12:09PM BST 05 Aug 2008Detectives' inability even to establish whether the toddler is alive or dead epitomised the inquiry's shortcomings, said public prosecutors Jose de Magalhaes and Joao Melchior Gomes.
The case against Kate and Gerry McCann, both 40, was dropped last month after it was decided that there was insufficient evidence against the couple.
...
The prosecutors said despite the huge manhunt and inquiry, little had been achieved.
"No element of proof whatsoever was found which allows us to form any lucid, sensible, serious and honest conclusion about the circumstances (of Madeleine's disappearance).
"Including, and most dramatically, establishing whether she is alive or dead, which seems more probable."
...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2504246/Madeleine-McCann-files-Portuguese-prosecutors-criticise-police.htmlWhich brings us right back round to where we should be bearing in mind that the discussion on this thread asks the question of whether or not Madeleine McCann is still alive ... raising the on topic question of who it was who declared her dead without a shred of evidence to support that hypothesis as stated by the Portuguese Prosecutors?