Netflix launches new 8-part documentary about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

[Mr Gray]

Cipriano's guilt is an Opinion even with a Conviction.

Of course it's an opinion.... The opinion of the judges, based on the evidence.. Grime gives his opinion on the alerts... And that's, all it is... Opinion..

[Mr Gray]

So no one who knows what they are talking about have said that 5a was treated differently. I see. Which still begs the question, why did the dogs alert to places and items belonging to only the McCanns ?

It's all been explained before. Yawn

[faithlilly]

It points at no one else either,the finest(really?) can't or won't even confirm if the girl is dead or alive they have no evidence pointing either way(MR),just where do you expect the investigtion to be heading?

It’s interesting that supporters wax lyrical about Sutton not knowing anything about the current investigation yet believe Gamble does when it suits their agenda.

Of course we have to remember that Sutton worked for SY yet Gamble never did so it would be safe to assume that he would have more contacts there.

[Erngath]

I'm finally watching the Netflix series of films.

Gobsmacked at the words of Sandra Figueras.
She certainly pulled no punches in her condemnation of Amaral and the police investigation.

I didn't think I would be upset by these films but found myself tearful at the replaying of those early days, terribly upset  by Rui Pedro's mother's pain and by the highlighting of the cruel words posted on social media towards Kate and Gerry and Kate's heartbreaking response.

[faithlilly]

I'm finally watching the Netflix series of films.

Gobsmacked at the words of Sandra Figueras.
She certainly pulled no punches in her condemnation of Amaral and the police investigation.

I didn't think I would be upset by these films but found myself tearful at the replaying of those early days, terribly upset  by Rui Pedro's mother's pain and by the highlighting of the cruel words posted on social media towards Kate and Gerry and Kate's heartbreaking response.

Yet Sandra knew about the DNA, Amaral and the police investigation when she conducted the ‘ask the dogs’ interview. How do you explain that and don’t you feel her epiphany is rather convenient.....after all her former opinion wouldn’t have flown in this rather McCann-friendly documentary would it ?

[Erngath]

Yet Sandra knew about the DNA, Amaral and the police investigation when she conducted the ‘ask the dogs’ interview. How do you explain that and don’t you feel her epiphany is rather convenient.....after all her former opinion wouldn’t have flown in this rather McCann-friendly documentary would it ?

Are you making an accusation against her?

[Angelo222]

The forum appears to be particularly busy today with 550 guests viewing at the same time, has something happened to create this interest?

[faithlilly]

Are you making an accusation against her?

No accusation, merely an observation.

Why do you think she did the ‘ask the dogs’ interview after the files were released and at a time when she must have known that she had been duped ? You see I’d be more convinced of her ‘ road to Damascus’ conversion  if she hadn’t conducted that interview.

[Erngath]

No accusation, merely an observation.

Why do you think she did the ‘ask the dogs’ interview after the files were released and at a time when she must have known that she had been duped ?

I don't know why.
Why do you think she did?
Why do you think she has had this " convenient epiphany"
Her embarrassment in her part in the proceedings did seem genuine.
She certainly condemned Amaral and the investigation and said "Thank God"  ( I believe those were her words) when the new chief of the investigation was appointed.

[faithlilly]

I don't know why.
Why do you think she did?
Why do you think she has had this "epiphany"
Her embarrassment in her part in the proceedings did seem genuine.
She certainly condemned Amaral and the investigation and said "Thank God"  ( I believe those were her words) when the new chief of the investigation was appointed.

I don’t know either but wouldn’t you be a little more convinced of her conversion if she hadn’t conducted that interview, an interview that clearly upset Kate ? Do you think it’s possible that she was paid for her part in the documentary ? She’s had 11 years to voice her doubts about the initial investigation yet has kept silence.

[Erngath]

I don’t know either but wouldn’t you be a little more convinced of her conversion if she hadn’t conducted that interview, an interview that clearly upset Kate ? Do you think it’s possible that she was paid for her part in the documentary ? She’s had 11 years to voice her doubts about the initial investigation yet has kept silence.

Paid to say what she said about being fed untruths ?
Paid to say she was embarrassed by her part in the proceedings?
Paid for what?

[Eleanor]

I have to admit that I have my doubts about Sandra.  Not what she said, but why she said it.

[Erngath]

I have to admit that I have my doubts about Sandra.  Not what she said, but why she said it.

Perhaps she is trying to disassociate herself from the botched enquiry?

[faithlilly]

Paid to say what she said about being fed untruths ?
Paid to say she was embarrassed by her part in the proceedings?
Paid for what?

Paid for her participation.

I notice you are avoiding answering any of my questions. SF clearly upset Kate on a number of occasions, and when she was at her most vulnerable,  simply to heighten her profile. Do you think she’d baulk at a similarly pragmatic approach this time ?

[faithlilly]

I have to admit that I have my doubts about Sandra.  Not what she said, but why she said it.

In the end she is a journalist.