Author Topic: A Room With A View...  (Read 67162 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #300 on: July 03, 2019, 08:33:29 PM »
Who said that they always used distancing language?
Oh, so just the once then?  One use of distancing language and 17 uses of non-distancing language means what exactly?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #301 on: July 03, 2019, 08:37:04 PM »

I believe they are sociopaths in their behaviour before ,on the day and after the day MBM was declared disappeared.
It was self protection at the cost of  assisting the police with as much information to find their daughter. The whole episode became a car crash of huge poportion.

They are holding back information is what I believe. Now as their abduction from the window story is blown apart by bloggers,  and other interested investigators world wide, they find themselves in a position of being exposed to a wider wiser audience that they had before.  They now know the reality...

I believe they didn’t help the police because it wouldn’t help Madeleine but it could implicate them.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #302 on: July 03, 2019, 08:38:44 PM »
GMC : I think that absolutely we don’t know what’s happened to Madeleine. Ermm, we don’t know who’s taken her. Probably our best chance of finding her is identifying that person, and that’s why the e-fits and the sketches and the new information tonight are so important to us, because that’s probably the best chance we’ve got of finding Madeleine.

Didn’t Mrs Fenn find it odd that Gerry said a little girl had disappeared rather than his daughter?

“She found it strange that Gerry when said that a girl had been abducted, he did not mention that it was his daughter and that he did not mention any other scenarios.”
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #303 on: July 03, 2019, 08:40:34 PM »
Oh, so just the once then?  One use of distancing language and 17 uses of non-distancing language means what exactly?

That Maggie was abducted?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Erngath

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #304 on: July 03, 2019, 08:42:04 PM »
I believe they didn’t help the police because it wouldn’t help Madeleine but it could implicate them.

So why did they pursue a review of the investigation by NSY?
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #305 on: July 03, 2019, 08:42:17 PM »
That Maggie was abducted?
Your respect for Madeleine is overwhelming.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #306 on: July 03, 2019, 08:44:54 PM »
Your respect for Madeleine is overwhelming.

Say's someone who is here for the crack.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #307 on: July 03, 2019, 08:45:46 PM »
Didn’t Mrs Fenn find it odd that Gerry said a little girl had disappeared rather than his daughter?

“She found it strange that Gerry when said that a girl had been abducted, he did not mention that it was his daughter and that he did not mention any other scenarios.”
I have just proven that the McCanns overwhelmingly used Madeleine’s name in an interview which you earlier claimed to find highly revealing for the alleged distancing language used.  Care to review your opinion?  Or do you think one use of the term “little girl” reveals their guilt?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #308 on: July 03, 2019, 08:46:24 PM »
I've no desire to explain everything they've said and done.
It's not me who places such weight on their every word and action since Madeleine disappeared.
I cannot place myself in  their shoes and say what I  would or would not do or would or would not say.

And a story to explain how quickly a child can be.out of sight.
Our grandsons aged ten and nine at the time, some years ago, were at the cinema..
We saw them in and then sat in a little cafe within the complex with their sister aged  five.
The film ended, out the boys came and within a second our granddaughter was.not beside us
My first thought was that.she had been taken, utter panic set in, then I realised one of the boys had gone to the toilet and yes she had.followed him.

So never, ever think it couldn't happen to you, no matter how careful and protective you are.

I know how quickly a child can slip from your view but that’s not what we are talking about.  Imagine you’d let you granddaughter go to another film and sit alone for half an hour. Would you think she was safe ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #309 on: July 03, 2019, 08:46:54 PM »
Say's someone who is here for the crack.
Yup I am, but doesn’t mean I have ever disrespected Madeleine by calling her Maggie, Maddie, MBM, or any other variation thereof,.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #310 on: July 03, 2019, 08:48:13 PM »
I know how quickly a child can slip from your view but that’s not what we are talking about.  Imagine you’d let you granddaughter go to another film and sit alone for half an hour. Would you think she was safe ?
Children can also come to harm at home while your back is turned, or while you are distracted, by a knock at the door, a pan on the boil, a telephone call, a vosit to the toilet.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #311 on: July 03, 2019, 08:50:27 PM »
I have just proven that the McCanns overwhelmingly used Madeleine’s name in an interview which you earlier claimed to find highly revealing for the alleged distancing language used.  Care to review your opinion?  Or do you think one use of the term “little girl” reveals their guilt?

You haven’t proven anything.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #312 on: July 03, 2019, 08:53:57 PM »
Children can also come to harm at home while your back is turned, or while you are distracted, by a knock at the door, a pan on the boil, a telephone call, a vosit to the toilet.

If that’s the case think what can befall them in an unlocked apartment in half an hour writhing access to a cooker, kettle, steep stairs etc, etc, etc.

You seem to be saying... ah 30 seconds or 30 minutes...it’s all the same. If it’s going to happen it’ll happen.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Erngath

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #313 on: July 03, 2019, 08:59:23 PM »
I know how quickly a child can slip from your view but that’s not what we are talking about.  Imagine you’d let you granddaughter go to another film and sit alone for half an hour. Would you think she was safe ?

No, but at that age I wouldn't let her out to play  in the street on a dark October evening either.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: A Room With A View...
« Reply #314 on: July 03, 2019, 09:01:37 PM »
You haven’t proven anything.
Yes I have.  I have proven that Spam selectively quoted from the interview, failing to mention that in the previous sentence Kate mentioned Madeleine by name and that her and her husband referred to Madeleine by name frequently throughout the interview.  You claimed to be gobsmacked that the parents would fail to use their child’s name and I’ve proven that they did, regularly. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".