The Science Of Sleep - Does It Offer A Better Explanation Than Sedation?

[Vertigo Swirl]

After you tell me if you think that the rest of tapas were ‘abnormal’ parents for locking their front doors ?

Of course I don’t think they were abnornal for locking their front doors.  Now your turn.

[faithlilly]

Of course I don’t think they were abnornal for locking their front doors.  Now your turn.

But isn’t that what ‘normal’ parents do....your words ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

But isn’t that what ‘normal’ parents do....your words ?

Cite? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

It is normal for parents minimize the chances of waking their kids up when they are asleep.  Nowhere have I suggested that it is normal to leave children alone in an unlocked apartment, but some people seem intent on twisting my words.  Why?

[Vertigo Swirl]

After you tell me if you think that the rest of tapas were ‘abnormal’ parents for locking their front doors ?

Now it’s your turn to answer my question, as you promised.

[faithlilly]

Cite?

‘No it doesn’t, it just suggests that they were normal parents who didn’t want to risk the possibility of waking their children in the night.’

So those who did lock their doors and risked waking their children are what....abnormal....or simply more risk averse ?

[Miss Taken Identity]

It is normal for parents minimize the chances of waking their kids up when they are asleep.  Nowhere have I suggested that it is normal to leave children alone in an unlocked apartment, but some people seem intent on twisting my words.  Why?

You do it all the time as you are only here for  the sniping (craic)  as you do on a regular basis adding nothing to the discussion of any value.

John I think it is time to get the block and ignore function working... taking threads apart like this is annoying.

[faithlilly]

You do it all the time as you are only here for  the sniping (craic)  as you do on a regular basis adding nothing to the discussion of any value.

John I think it is time to get the block and ignore function working... taking threads apart like this is annoying.

I wonder why John disabled the ignore function ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I wonder why John disabled the ignore function ?

WEll it seems you are not going to answer my question as you promised, well there's a surprise. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

You do it all the time as you are only here for  the sniping (craic)  as you do on a regular basis adding nothing to the discussion of any value.

John I think it is time to get the block and ignore function working... taking threads apart like this is annoying.

In your opinion.  Guess what?  You don't need a computer function to enable you to ignore me.  You can just either skip over my posts or read and choose not to reply.  As far as I know you have never had me on ignore before so clearly enjoy reading and replying to my posts. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

‘No it doesn’t, it just suggests that they were normal parents who didn’t want to risk the possibility of waking their children in the night.’

So those who did lock their doors and risked waking their children are what....abnormal....or simply more risk averse ?

It is normal for parents minimize the chances of waking their kids up when they are asleep.  Nowhere have I suggested that it is normal to leave children alone in an unlocked apartment, but some people seem intent on twisting my words.  Why?

[Vertigo Swirl]

https://www.simplesleep.co.uk/is-your-baby-a-light-sleeper/ 

[Robittybob1]

I didn’t ask for a cite, I asked you to tell me.  You have declined to do so.

Why do you think the children were more vulnerable than the others?  Why should leaving the door unlocked make them any more vulnerable?  Please explain.

If I'm allowed to step in, I think the McCann children were more vulnerable because the other people who knew that the door was unlocked worried about the kids and hence started to interfere.

[Miss Taken Identity]

If I'm allowed to step in, I think the McCann children were more vulnerable because the other people who knew that the door was unlocked worried about the kids and hence started to interfere.

Okay let us reel this back.

Why did Kate leave  the door unlocked?

because it was to allow Maddie to go and get them if she and other children woke up crying

Why would that be?

because as the mother, she knew the children had been awake and crying previously.


Is this correct yes or no... or emphatic No!

Having monitored the childrens sleep patterns since birth- making an informed evaluation of those occurances, and analysing the outcomes is a  direct established scientific  remit.

[Robittybob1]

Okay let us reel this back.

Why did Kate leave  the door unlocked?

because it was to allow Maddie to go and get them if she and other children woke up crying

Why would that be?

because as the mother, she knew the children had been awake and crying previously.


Is this correct yes or no... or emphatic No!

Having monitored the childrens sleep patterns since birth- making an informed evaluation of those occurances, and analysing the outcomes is a  direct established scientific  remit.

No that is an emphatic no.

It wasn't the first night they left the patio door unlocked AFAIK.

So the difference in the Thursday night was that they told Madeleine where they were.  Where she could come and find them if she is worried during the night.