Exhibit A and the Trial of D'Andre Lane.

[Vertigo Swirl]

He also says they must be corroberated, which, in the Lane case, the prosecutors decided they were. The case didn't rely on the alerts, it relied on a collection of evidence of which they were just one part.

Casting the dog alerts to one side for a moment, what was the “beyond reasonable doubt” evidence that was presented in court?

[faithlilly]

And yet Bianca’s mother is convinced she is still alive.

And ?

[G-Unit]

Casting the dog alerts to one side for a moment, what was the “beyond reasonable doubt” evidence that was presented in court?

I suggest you read the reports.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I suggest you read the reports.

I have, and I ask again, what is the beyond reasonable doubt evidence?

[Vertigo Swirl]

And ?

Clearly she is not convinced by the dogs or the other circumstantial evidence, so why are you?

[Mr Gray]

Was he?

Yes it's in his statement or rog

[Robittybob1]

why has grime now changed his mind and presented the alerts as evidence

As G-unit said in the post before yours "The case didn't rely on the alerts, it relied on a collection of evidence of which they were just one part."  You even quoted it yourself.

[faithlilly]

Clearly she is not convinced by the dogs or the other circumstantial evidence, so why are you?

I’m not convinced by the dogs. Im convinced by the child’s sibling’s testimony. What reason did she have to lie ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I’m not convinced by the dogs. Im convinced by the child’s sibling’s testimony. What reason did she have to lie ?

What reason did her cousin have to lie that he saw her alive in the morning?

[faithlilly]

What reason did her cousin have to lie that he saw her alive in the morning?

One morning can be confused for another. It’s very hard to misremember the fact that your sibling was sitting beside you, mute and covered in a blanket.

[Vertigo Swirl]

One morning can be confused for another. It’s very hard to misremember the fact that your sibling was sitting beside you, mute and covered in a blanket.

The cousin was in the same car at the same time and claims Bianca was alive.  You choose to believe one over rhe other, not because of any incontrovertible evidence but because you choose to.  Your choice.

[faithlilly]

The cousin was in the same car at the same time and claims Bianca was alive.  You choose to believe one over rhe other, not because of any incontrovertible evidence but because you choose to.  Your choice.

You have still given no reason why Bianca’s sibling may have lied.

[Robittybob1]

You have still given no reason why Bianca’s sibling may have lied.

Was she mistaken too?

[Vertigo Swirl]

You have still given no reason why Bianca’s sibling may have lied.

She was an eight year old child, and I don’t think she lied.  Did she say she saw Bianca dead?  No.  But I tell you what, I’ll offer the same explanation as you gave me re: the cousin’s testimony - one morning can be confused for another, ok?

[faithlilly]

Was she mistaken too?

Mistaken that she saw her sibling mute and covered in a blanket ? What do you think ?