Exhibit A and the Trial of D'Andre Lane.

[G-Unit]

I know I’m not, it was all circumstantial, nothing whatsoever of substance.

Is this the evidence of which you said there's none to find? How can you form an opinion about something you can't find so have no knowledge of?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Is this the evidence of which you said there's none to find? How can you form an opinion about something you can't find so have no knowledge of?

I asked for “beyond reasonable doubt” evidence, you refused to supply it, that’s because there was no incontrovertible proof of Lane’s guilt. Is that not true?  If not, what did I miss?

[G-Unit]

I asked for “beyond reasonable doubt” evidence, you refused to supply it, that’s because there was no incontrovertible proof of Lane’s guilt. Is that not true?  If not, what did I miss?

It's the jury's job to decide if the evidence is enough to convince them of guilt 'beyond reasonable doubt'. The jury thought it did and Lane was jailed. I don't think it matters whether it convinces you or not.

[Wonderfulspam]

If Lane was carjacked & his daughter was abducted then he suffered an attack of amnesia preventing him from calling the police & then also failed a polygraph.

How unfortunate for this poor innocent man.

[jassi]

If Lane was carjacked & his daughter was abducted then he suffered an attack of amnesia preventing him from calling the police & then also failed a polygraph.

How unfortunate for this poor innocent man.

Some people are just born to play the victim role.

[Mr Gray]

It's the jury's job to decide if the evidence is enough to convince them of guilt 'beyond reasonable doubt'. The jury thought it did and Lane was jailed. I don't think it matters whether it convinces you or not.

And it's thr police who decide who should be investigated.. It doesn't matter what you or anyone here thinks

[Eleanor]

America does seem to have a propensity towards Miscarriages of Justice.  Never mind, at least they aren't going to execute Lane.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's the jury's job to decide if the evidence is enough to convince them of guilt 'beyond reasonable doubt'. The jury thought it did and Lane was jailed. I don't think it matters whether it convinces you or not.

Of course it doesn’t matter to anyone think what I think, nor what you think either, that doesn’t stop us expressing our views though does it?

[Vertigo Swirl]

If Lane was carjacked & his daughter was abducted then he suffered an attack of amnesia preventing him from calling the police & then also failed a polygraph.

How unfortunate for this poor innocent man.

Perhaps what with him being black and all he had an antipathy towards the police and thought they might try and stitch him up?

[G-Unit]

And it's thr police who decide who should be investigated.. It doesn't matter what you or anyone here thinks

Then the prosecutors decide whether to prosecute. I don't think anything because I don't care whether Lane was guilty or not. I'm sumply pointing out that a jury found him guilty based on the evidence oresented.

[Wonderfulspam]

Perhaps what with him being black and all he had an antipathy towards the police and thought they might try and stitch him up?

Are all police officers white then?

[Eleanor]

Then the prosecutors decide whether to prosecute. I don't think anything because I don't care whether Lane was guilty or not. I'm sumply pointing out that a jury found him guilty based on the evidence oresented.

I care about whether he was guilty or not.

[Wonderfulspam]

I care about whether he was guilty or not.

He was guilty.

[Eleanor]

He was guilty.

I am not convinced.  And I certainly don't think that your Opinion is reliable.

[Wonderfulspam]

I am not convinced.  And I certainly don't think that your Opinion is reliable.

So you believe his story, that he was carjacked then suffered a mental blackout?

Does that really sound likely to you?

Do you want to buy some magic beans?