Feedback for any improvements of the Madeleine McCann board.

[Holly Goodhead]

Two Supporter Mods.  Two Sceptic Mods.   And One Middle of The Road.  And yourself of course.  What more do you want? 

The fact that neither Slarti or Angelo post very often is their business.

Me personally?  I do object to being insulted.  And no Mod here has had more of that to deal with than I have.

Ok but if the 'sceptic' mods are inactive most of the time then there's an imbalance?

[carlymichelle]

I agree. I have had posts deleted for no other reason than that.

not uncommon

[Mr Gray]

I agree. I have had posts deleted for no other reason than that.

Yet you "liked" Robs clearly abusive post towards me....I find that a little pathetic from someone who constantly harps on about forum rules

[Holly Goodhead]

I agree. I have had posts deleted for no other reason than that.

If this is so then surely it defeats the object of a discussion forum?

[Holly Goodhead]

Yet you "liked" Robs clearly abusive post towards me....I find that a little pathetic from someone who constantly harps on about forum rules

Davel I have asked you politely to draw a line under this.  Please do not refer to it again and I would urge others to refrain from responding.   It has been dealt with to your satisfaction. 

Any further posts re this will be removed on sight.

[Mr Gray]

Ok but if the 'sceptic' mods are inactive most of the time then there's an imbalance?

Its an imbalance because two sceptic mods...stephen and sil...were removed by john becasue of their poor moderation

It shouldnt matter what a mods personal views are they should moderate fairly...if they cant they should not be mods

[Mr Gray]

Davel I have asked you politely to draw a line under this.  Please do not refer to it again and I would urge others to refrain from responding.   It has been dealt with to your satisfaction. 

Any further posts re this will be removed on sight.

It has not been dealt with to my satisfaction.......the thread is re moderation amd my post is on topic...it is relevant that a poster who complains about unfair moderation likes a post thats a prime example

[Holly Goodhead]

It has not been dealt with to my satisfaction.......the thread is re moderation amd my post is on topic...it is relevant that a poster who complains about unfair moderation likes a post thats a prime example

What is it you remain unhappy about?

[G-Unit]

If this is so then surely it defeats the object of a discussion forum?

It is so and has always made discussion very difficult when posts which are not supportive of the McCanns are censored.

[carlymichelle]

It is so and has always made discussion very difficult when posts which are not supportive of the McCanns are censored.

exactly  it   causes friction on the forum  too theres no need for any censorship

[Holly Goodhead]

Its an imbalance because two sceptic mods...stephen and sil...were removed by john becasue of their poor moderation

Then maybe some re-balancing is required?

It shouldnt matter what a mods personal views are they should moderate fairly...if they cant they should not be mods

I agree.

[Lace]

It is so and has always made discussion very difficult when posts which are not supportive of the McCanns are censored.

IMO that has been apparent for both sides.

[Holly Goodhead]

It is so and has always made discussion very difficult when posts which are not supportive of the McCanns are censored.

Well I certainly will not be censoring posts on the basis they are not supportive of the McCanns. 

Everyone is entitled to view their opinions here so long as they do so respectfully and abide by the forum rules. 

[G-Unit]

It has not been dealt with to my satisfaction.......the thread is re moderation amd my post is on topic...it is relevant that a poster who complains about unfair moderation likes a post thats a prime example

I think you mean me. It isn't against forum rules to 'like' another members post. That has nothing to do with moderation.

[Holly Goodhead]

Can someone explain for me please how the 'bot' thing works?