Feedback for any improvements of the Madeleine McCann board.

[Vertigo Swirl]

But they are difficult to avoid to be fair Jassi.  They both end up on  almost every thread. The snowflake have this as their therapy. it isn't working it would seem. *giggles*

“they goad and seek a reply to goad again” - Miss Taken Identity.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Ah, let’s just slag off the mentally ill snow flakes, clearly there’s nothing else to discuss these days.

Oh I am sure you will agree I never mentioned the mentally ill. However, Kate is far better at slagging them off than me,  with her eloquent manner.  And you are defending her right to do so.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Oh I am sure you will agree I never mentioned the mentally ill. However, Kate is far better at slagging them off than me,  with her eloquent manner.  And you are defending her right to do so- how quaint.

Why do you perceive snowflakes need therapy?

[Holly Goodhead]

Now you are going too far, Imo, Holly.

The Generals witty comment was a gem, which we all enjoyed.  Why did you remove it?

Which comment?  When?  I've only removed one post in the last few days and it wasn't from The General. 

[Holly Goodhead]

Just to clarify anyone who wishes to criticise any non-member constructively is entitled to do so without fear of censure whether it be McCanns, PJ, GA or anyone else. 

In terms of responding to posts please argue the content and don't personalise it. 

[G-Unit]

It seems to me that people who get upset about a particular spelling of a word are over-sensitive. Why they then go on and on and on about it for days afterwards, despite having managed to outlaw that particular spelling is beyond me. It's probably being used as an excuse to moan, imo.

[John]

Could we all please keep to the subject under discussion and cease the sniping. TY

PS.  Comments in relation to moderation should be posted on the appropriate board.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Could we all please keep to the subject under discussion and cease the sniping. TY

PS.  Comments in relation to moderation should be posted on the appropriate board.

This thread is about moderation of the forum so how do we both stay on topic and not post about moderation?

[G-Unit]

This thread is about moderation of the forum so how do we both stay on topic and not post about moderation?

This thread is about animosity, which some have chosen to argue is due to moderators.

[Vertigo Swirl]

This thread is about animosity, which some have chosen to argue is due to moderators.

”Feedback for any improvements of the Madeleine McCann board”.  What exactly are we meant to be discussing? 

[Mr Gray]

I would say that the main reason for the animosity on this forum is the level of animosity towards the mccanns. i havent posted on other boards here but suspect that they are more related to the facts than personal opinions of those involved

[Vertigo Swirl]

It’s kind of ironic IMO that this thread was started by the moderator (citing their concern about animosity) who subsequently went out of her way to deliberately wind up members of the forum.  if you want to avoid animosity don’t deliberately wind people up would be a good rule for moderators to adopt IMO

[Brietta]

I think there have been some viciously nasty posts of late concerning events which happened more than twelve years ago and about which nothing can be changed by any member of this forum either individually or collectively.

I think the forum could be immeasurably improved if those members, who appear to be inimically hostile about the McCann family to the point of obsession, were to refrain from taking every opportunity to be as negative as possible when discussing Madeleine's case.

[jassi]

I think there have been some viciously nasty posts of late concerning events which happened more than twelve years ago and about which nothing can be changed by any member of this forum either individually or collectively.

I think the forum could be immeasurably improved if those members, who appear to be inimically hostile about the McCann family to the point of obsession, were to refrain from taking every opportunity to be as negative as possible when discussing Madeleine's case.

You been appointed Chief Censor ?

[Wonderfulspam]

I think there have been some viciously nasty posts of late concerning events which happened more than twelve years ago and about which nothing can be changed by any member of this forum either individually or collectively.

I think the forum could be immeasurably improved if those members, who appear to be inimically hostile about the McCann family to the point of obsession, were to refrain from taking every opportunity to be as negative as possible when discussing Madeleine's case.

Is there anything positive that can be said about the case?
Or about the McCanns for that matter?
Answers on a postage stamp.