A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[Mr Gray]

I understand your point only too well just as I understand the point of the puerile deflections which plague the board and would be better discussed on the thread about improvement if anyone was really interested.

Perhaps those who really should realise that everyone else has "moved on" are those stuck with the flies in the web of Amaral's lies daily regurgitating every false premise he ever dreamed up in the hopes of saving and furthering his career.
After clearing up the mess he and his theories left behind him the authorities are doing now what he was incapable of doing and that is properly conducting an investigation at the time into what happened to Madeleine McCann.

Please don't insult yourself by claiming "a big boy dunnit and ran way";  Amaral "dunnit" and has been the poster boy for it by dint of extolling that fact for over twelve years.

Amaral's influence on Madeleine's case was a total and utter disaster.  His baseless theories are the stuff of nonsense and none more so than his hypothesis involving a deep freezer complete with his anonymous eye witnesses who appear nowhere but in his imagination.

Snip

"The little girl died in that apartment" - Gonçalo Amaral on TVI


GA: If we take into account that, if we consider the traces that were found in the car boot…

JP: … which are in fact…

GA: … which are in fact from the little girl. In order to justify that bodily fluid as the lab says, it could only have been preserved and conserved in the cold because otherwise it would have been…

JP: That means that…

GA: … in an advanced state of decomposition, at least it’s a hypothesis. Therefore it’s a question of a deep freezer, or something similar, and there we had to search for it and that was what we were doing. This means, the contacts that they had, where they went, where they were seen… There are people who say that they were seen entering an apartment block near the cemetery in Praia da Luz. At that point in time we weren’t able to detect which apartment they entered, who lived there, because it’s also a bit complicated because you have to understand it’s a tourist area and often it’s not known who the apartment belongs to.

So amaral states, as a fact that the traces in the car come from Maddie... And people, still take this man seriously

[barrier]

Mark Rowley 2017:MR: Whilst we’ve got some lead ideas there is still a lot of unknown on this case. We’ve got a young girl gone missing 10 years ago. Until we get to the point where we have solved it, we’re unlikely to
have definitive evidence as to exactly what happened at the time. All the hypothesises that you or I
could come up with, they all have to remain open and the key lines of enquiry open today focus on
one or two of those areas but we have to keep them all open until we get to that critical piece of
evidence that narrows it down and helps us to be more confident as to exactly what has happened on
the day Maddie went missing.

At no point does he rule out Amarals theory,hard to stomach but hey ho.

[barrier]

Absolutely... I watched a video of Poulton last month singing amarals praises.... The alerts, from the digs, with a 100% record... That the, FFS, destroyed or lost the dna... Practically everything she said was untrue

As if Poulton has some standing.

[G-Unit]

I understand your point only too well just as I understand the point of the puerile deflections which plague the board and would be better discussed on the thread about improvement if anyone was really interested.

Perhaps those who really should realise that everyone else has "moved on" are those stuck with the flies in the web of Amaral's lies daily regurgitating every false premise he ever dreamed up in the hopes of saving and furthering his career.
After clearing up the mess he and his theories left behind him the authorities are doing now what he was incapable of doing and that is properly conducting an investigation at the time into what happened to Madeleine McCann.

Please don't insult yourself by claiming "a big boy dunnit and ran way";  Amaral "dunnit" and has been the poster boy for it by dint of extolling that fact for over twelve years.

Amaral's influence on Madeleine's case was a total and utter disaster.  His baseless theories are the stuff of nonsense and none more so than his hypothesis involving a deep freezer complete with his anonymous eye witnesses who appear nowhere but in his imagination.

Snip

"The little girl died in that apartment" - Gonçalo Amaral on TVI


GA: If we take into account that, if we consider the traces that were found in the car boot…

JP: … which are in fact…

GA: … which are in fact from the little girl. In order to justify that bodily fluid as the lab says, it could only have been preserved and conserved in the cold because otherwise it would have been…

JP: That means that…

GA: … in an advanced state of decomposition, at least it’s a hypothesis. Therefore it’s a question of a deep freezer, or something similar, and there we had to search for it and that was what we were doing. This means, the contacts that they had, where they went, where they were seen… There are people who say that they were seen entering an apartment block near the cemetery in Praia da Luz. At that point in time we weren’t able to detect which apartment they entered, who lived there, because it’s also a bit complicated because you have to understand it’s a tourist area and often it’s not known who the apartment belongs to.

You really think you're onto something, don't you? Meanwhile the only people who might be interested in your Amaral-bashing are the 'few' he influenced.

[Mr Gray]

As if Poulton has some standing.

It seems some think she has... How foolish

[Mr Gray]

At no point does he rule out Amarals theory,hard to stomach but hey ho.

Not at all... He doesn't bother stating the obvious

Amarals theory requires it possible for a 4 yr oldchild to die within minutes of rilling off a sofa... Impossible... Amaral rules out his own theory based in it's impossibility imo

[Brietta]

You really think you're onto something, don't you? Meanwhile the only people who might be interested in your Amaral-bashing are the 'few' he influenced.

What a strange post ;)

How can I possibly be accused of so called Amaral bashing when I am using his own words translated into English verbatim by volunteer translators.

Instead of directing ad hom accusations at me in your posts ... why not challenge or defend the content of my posts.  As far as I am concerned that is the point of being a member of a discussion forum.

This thread concerns  the quality of theories.

It is my contention that the investigation into Madeleine McCann's case was blown out of the water by the nonsensical and unprofessional theories contrived by the coordinator of her case Goncalo Amaral.

So far no-one has been able to refute a word I have posted so I must be making sense.  Very interesting.

[G-Unit]

What a strange post ;)

How can I possibly be accused of so called Amaral bashing when I am using his own words translated into English verbatim by volunteer translators.

Instead of directing ad hom accusations at me in your posts ... why not challenge or defend the content of my posts.  As far as I am concerned that is the point of being a member of a discussion forum.

This thread concerns  the quality of theories.

It is my contention that the investigation into Madeleine McCann's case was blown out of the water by the nonsensical and unprofessional theories contrived by the coordinator of her case Goncalo Amaral.

So far no-one has been able to refute a word I have posted so I must be making sense.  Very interesting.

It is my contention that Amaral's theories were as good as if not better than those of the McCanns.

[jassi]

It is my contention that Amaral's theories were as good as if not better than those of the McCanns.

Certainly as good, as neither have been proved to be true or false - as yet.

[Mr Gray]

It is my contention that Amaral's theories were as good as if not better than those of the McCanns.

And that's all it us your contention... Neither of the two present investigations seem to agree with you

[Vertigo Swirl]

You didn't understand my point? If Amaral only influenced 'a few' people surely there's no need to keep moaning about him for twelve years? Perhaps you need to move on.

How about you do the same re: the McCanns?  Fat chance of that!

[Vertigo Swirl]

It is my contention that Amaral's theories were as good as if not better than those of the McCanns.

There’s none so blind, etc.   What aspect of Amaral’s theory do you consider good and credible?  Based on what?

[G-Unit]

There’s none so blind, etc.   What aspect of Amaral’s theory do you consider good and credible?  Based on what?

Did I describe his theories as good and credible or was that you? I compared it to the McCann's theories. Neither has been proved to be correct.

[ShiningInLuz]

I see the spirit of Christmas has broken out.

Mine's a Moscow Mule.  If I get some limes.

 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Did I describe his theories as good and credible or was that you? I compared it to the McCann's theories. Neither has been proved to be correct.

Either Amaral’s theories are credible or they’re not - which is it?