A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[The General]

We're discussing the length of Rachel Oldfield's legs now?
It may be head wobble time.

[G-Unit]

Redwood:A description very close to that of Madeleine McCann" being carried by smithman.

The description is certainly more convincing than a pair of legs and feet;

He states that the child was female, about four years of age as she was similar to his granddaughter of the same age. She was a child of normal build, about a metre in height though not being absolutely certain of that as she was being carried. The child has blonde medium-hued hair, without being very light. Her skin was very white, typical of a Brit.

the child was female because she had straight long hair to the neck. The colour was fair/light brown.
— She is certain that the child was about four years old because her niece (who was in the group) is of the same age and they were the same size.

He states the child was female. She was perhaps two or three years old, in that she appeared to him to be a bit smaller than his niece of the same age. She was a child of normal build. She had blonde hair, of medium shade, not very light. Her skin was white, typically British.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm

[pathfinder73]

More likely than thru the patio door cos that was not obscured by a bush, but someone still had to climb/ descend steps that altho partly in darkness, went into the glow of the street lamp immediately opposite at the bottom and at the top.


The Front door is way most likely method of entry, due to its really dark entrance/ porchway.

Also the scent trails picked up by the dogs.

Also Jane Tanners  sighting.



Of course it needed some way for getting the key, but that has already been done to death on here several times before.







I sometimes wonder if a person protecting an OC / MW staff member is influencing other sceptics on here to push the patio door angle ?   Cos I cannot understand why the Front door is pointedly being ignored by all sceptics on here, when it is so obviously the most likely point of entry/ departure. 


It also could be someone, a sceptic, connected to an abduction, who is inflencing the other sceptics.   This person just wants to muddy the waters and make it more difficult for the investigating police .... Maybe?

I follow evidence not what SY may or not be doing. You descend the steps to reach the garden where Eddie alerted. There are two possible exits from the garden. By using the gate which brings you onto the main street near to the tapas entrance where you could be easily spotted (so not so good!) or you can go straight over the small wall without being seen (The Oldfields were at the tapas table at the time Madeleine was removed). I believe the small wall exit was used by Smithman. Nobody used the dark alley way at night so to Smithman it was a safer route to use. Madeleine was removed the patio way in my theory.

[Brietta]

I follow evidence not what SY may or not be doing. You descend the steps to reach the garden where Eddie alerted. There are two possible exits from the garden. By using the gate which brings you onto the main street near to the tapas entrance where you could be easily spotted (so not so good!) or you can go straight over the small wall without being seen (The Oldfields were at the tapas table at the time Madeleine was removed). I believe the small wall exit was used by Smithman. Nobody used the dark alley way at night so to Smithman it was a safer route to use. Madeleine was removed the patio way in my theory.

The GNR dogs showed not the slightest interest in the patio or either patio door;  they showed not the slightest bit of interest in the steps leading into the garden where yet again they showed no interest;  nor did the dogs show the slightest interest at the garden gate or anywhere near it.
How does that fit in with your theory?

[barrier]

I follow evidence not what SY may or not be doing. You descend the steps to reach the garden where Eddie alerted. There are two possible exits from the garden. By using the gate which brings you onto the main street near to the tapas entrance where you could be easily spotted (so not so good!) or you can go straight over the small wall without being seen (The Oldfields were at the tapas table at the time Madeleine was removed). I believe the small wall exit was used by Smithman. Nobody used the dark alley way at night so to Smithman it was a safer route to use. Madeleine was removed the patio way in my theory.

Over the wall where I've added the orange blob?

[Brietta]

Over the wall where I've added the orange blob?

 
                           ??? How did they arrive there ???  Levitate ???

[G-Unit]

The GNR dogs showed not the slightest interest in the patio or either patio door;  they showed not the slightest bit of interest in the steps leading into the garden where yet again they showed no interest;  nor did the dogs show the slightest interest at the garden gate or anywhere near it.
How does that fit in with your theory?

Were they asked to sniff those areas? As far as I can ascertain they were used at the front of the block by the front door, not at the back, in the garden or near the 5A gate.

[barrier]

Were they asked to sniff those areas? As far as I can ascertain they were used at the front of the block by the front door, not at the back, in the garden or near the 5A gate.

Look over there not here.

[The General]

Were they asked to sniff those areas? As far as I can ascertain they were used at the front of the block by the front door, not at the back, in the garden or near the 5A gate.

I would imagine they would have asked the parents which way Madeleine last left the apartment (apart from the last last way).

[Brietta]

Were they asked to sniff those areas? As far as I can ascertain they were used at the front of the block by the front door, not at the back, in the garden or near the 5A gate.

As far as I know most searches started at the apartment spreading out from there and the GNR dogs were given free rein by their handlers to follow their noses.
Also conducted was ~ "a discontinuous search, in other words, to sniff the girl's clothes and immediately search near to the apartments, checking to see if there was any change in the behaviour of the dogs." https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GNR_SNIFFER.htm  The only apartment which excited any interest in the dogs was apartment 5J.

[The General]

As far as I know most searches started at the apartment spreading out from there and the GNR dogs were given free rein by their handlers to follow their noses.
Also conducted was ~ "a discontinuous search, in other words, to sniff the girl's clothes and immediately search near to the apartments, checking to see if there was any change in the behaviour of the dogs." https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GNR_SNIFFER.htm  The only apartment which excited any interest in the dogs was apartment 5J.

OMG the freezer!

[barrier]

As far as I know most searches started at the apartment spreading out from there and the GNR dogs were given free rein by their handlers to follow their noses.
Also conducted was ~ "a discontinuous search, in other words, to sniff the girl's clothes and immediately search near to the apartments, checking to see if there was any change in the behaviour of the dogs." https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GNR_SNIFFER.htm The only apartment which excited any interest in the dogs was apartment 5J.

Not even 5a?

[Vertigo Swirl]

OMG the freezer!

”Sometimes when you have nothing sensible to say it is better to say nothing at all” - Confucius.

[Brietta]

Not even 5a?

The only apartment in which the GNR dogs showed any interest was 5L. https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GNR_SNIFFER.htm

[Admin]

Please note that I will be posting this message intermittently as a warning to those members who would flaunt the forum rules.

All posters should be aware of the rules which can be found at the top of the home/index page.  More specifically, members are expected to show respect and tolerance towards other users and above all refrain from posting insults or goading comments. Derogatory comments aimed at any member will be removed and a warning issued. Persistent flaunting of the rules will attract sanctions should they continue after a warning has been issued.

Members are free to express their opinion on any topic subject to the forum rules.

Admin