KM's Paperback (PB)

[Vertigo Swirl]

If Gerry is Smithman then yes and his wife knows. Police wouldn't think they were covering up an accident if they are involved. Amaral was nice.

I'm not interested in your views, i was asking Holly who does NOT believe Gerry was Smithman.  Amaral was not nice IMO so that is your opinion, not a fact. 

[G-Unit]

How do you know they have refused to do this?  Why does the acknowledgement need to be made public?  To satisfy whom and why?

I know by reading and listening to what they have said. They voluntarily went public, no-one forced them give interviews, partake in photo-shoots or write a book.

Some people accepted their story without question, others didn't. The McCanns and some of those who accepted their story attacked without mercy those who didn't believe the story, and they are still doing it.

Questioning the McCann's story isn't evidence of madness, badness, sadness, jealousy or sectarianism. The anamolies, evasions and the inexplicable pronouncements are all real and the evidence of them is real too.

In my opinion blackening the characters and questioning the motives of those who haven't accepted the story doesn't answer the questions, it just verifies that those doing it are unable to provide believable answers.
 

[Vertigo Swirl]

I know by reading and listening to what they have said. They voluntarily went public, no-one forced them give interviews, partake in photo-shoots or write a book.

Some people accepted their story without question, others didn't. The McCanns and some of those who accepted their story attacked without mercy those who didn't believe the story, and they are still doing it.

Questioning the McCann's story isn't evidence of madness, badness, sadness, jealousy or sectarianism. The anamolies, evasions and the inexplicable pronouncements are all real and the evidence of them is real too.

In my opinion blackening the characters and questioning the motives of those who haven't accepted the story doesn't answer the questions, it just verifies that those doing it are unable to provide believable answers.

So acknowledging their “treatment of their children” to their nearest and dearest, in private, is not enough for you.  You want a public announcement.  Like I asked before - why do you want it?  How will it satisfy your needs?
PS stop playing the victim card.   You are not a victim.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Also, how about some McCann bashers providing some “verifiable answers” for a change?  Like how, when where and why they hid their child’s body for a start!!

[Mr Gray]

I know by reading and listening to what they have said. They voluntarily went public, no-one forced them give interviews, partake in photo-shoots or write a book.

Some people accepted their story without question, others didn't. The McCanns and some of those who accepted their story attacked without mercy those who didn't believe the story, and they are still doing it.

Questioning the McCann's story isn't evidence of madness, badness, sadness, jealousy or sectarianism. The anamolies, evasions and the inexplicable pronouncements are all real and the evidence of them is real too.

In my opinion blackening the characters and questioning the motives of those who haven't accepted the story doesn't answer the questions, it just verifies that those doing it are unable to provide believable answers.

You are so misgiuded to think people accept their account without question...
You are further misguided to think the mccanns attack those who disagree with them. They defend themselves against those who imply or say they are liars... I don't see anything wrong with that

[ShiningInLuz]

Also, how about some McCann bashers providing some “verifiable answers” for a change?  Like how, when where and why they hid their child’s body for a start!!

Nearest dumpster is the obvious answer.

[Mr Gray]

Nearest dumpster is the obvious answer.

Yes... How very dare the mccanns be offended by those who say that... How very unreasonable of them

[jassi]

Also, how about some McCann bashers providing some “verifiable answers” for a change?  Like how, when where and why they hid their child’s body for a start!!

Why ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Nearest dumpster is the obvious answer.

That's verifiable is it?  OK then, verify it.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Why ?

Why not?

[jassi]

Why not?

I see no need.

[Mr Gray]

Nearest dumpster is the obvious answer.

This is a wonderful example of what gunit refers to as disagreeing with the mccanns..

[Vertigo Swirl]

I see no need.

I'm not really interested in your needs or otherwise.

[jassi]

I'm not really interested in your needs or otherwise.

You clearly are, otherwise you wouldn't have asked the question .

[ShiningInLuz]

That's verifiable is it?  OK then, verify it.

If you ask a stupid question, do you really expect the case solution on a platter?