Author Topic: The phone call  (Read 139429 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: The phone call
« Reply #285 on: February 21, 2020, 01:11:18 PM »
It doesn't.

It does.  I'm not saying it shows NB made the call just that it was entirely possible for him to have done so before any shots were fired. Jurors were misled over this in that they were told JB entered NB/June's bedroom and opened fire with NB sustaining the facial wounds there.  How could he then have made the phone call when the pathological evidence showed he was incapable of purposeful speech thereafter and had he attempted to put his mouth to the phone he would have transferred blood stains it.

The physical evidence at soc places NB on the landing stairs when he sustained his facial wounds so entirely possible he came up the stairs from the kitchen having made the call to JB.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: The phone call
« Reply #286 on: February 21, 2020, 01:44:25 PM »

Mmm. Whilst I'm not condoning what he did, he wasn't the first, and he certainly won't be the last, to 'play away' during a wife's pregnancy. Bottom line was that it was only sex, and as such, just another appetite to feed. Once sated, forgotten. We must also remember that his and Sheila's probably wasn't a mutual love match. Once the pregnancy was lost, which forced their marriage, it may have been that he was looking for a way out, but was stopped by Sheila, desperate to be a mother, becoming pregnant with the twins and following a difficult pregnancy giving birth to boys he adored. As the saying goes, "Man cannot live on bread alone".

But I don't think it was just another appetite to feed as CC ended up living with the woman in question: Jan Flowers. It seems she eventually saw the light and offloaded him.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline G-Unit

Re: The phone call
« Reply #287 on: February 21, 2020, 02:26:45 PM »

Mmm. Whilst I'm not condoning what he did, he wasn't the first, and he certainly won't be the last, to 'play away' during a wife's pregnancy. Bottom line was that it was only sex, and as such, just another appetite to feed. Once sated, forgotten. We must also remember that his and Sheila's probably wasn't a mutual love match. Once the pregnancy was lost, which forced their marriage, it may have been that he was looking for a way out, but was stopped by Sheila, desperate to be a mother, becoming pregnant with the twins and following a difficult pregnancy giving birth to boys he adored. As the saying goes, "Man cannot live on bread alone".

Nevertheless it nullifies your attempt to suggest Caffell was still enamoured of Sheila, doesn't it? How do you know it was 'only sex'?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: The phone call
« Reply #288 on: February 21, 2020, 02:30:03 PM »
And June wasn’t fatally injured at that time...Jeremy shot her dead between the eyes after she got up and ran

People usually run away from the person with the gun, so shooting them between the eyes would be difficult.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline APRIL

Re: The phone call
« Reply #289 on: February 21, 2020, 02:44:51 PM »
Nevertheless it nullifies your attempt to suggest Caffell was still enamoured of Sheila, doesn't it? How do you know it was 'only sex'?


MY attempt? I'm not aware of ever having suggested that such was the case.............although I have no doubts that he had once been in lust with her. As the mother of his children he probably retained a fondness for her.

Offline Myster

Re: The phone call
« Reply #290 on: February 21, 2020, 02:49:49 PM »

MY attempt? I'm not aware of ever having suggested that such was the case.............although I have no doubts that he had once been in lust with her. As the mother of his children he probably retained a fondness for her.
And he still retains contact with and obviously has a fondness for Christine, Sheila's mother.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Caroline

Re: The phone call
« Reply #291 on: February 21, 2020, 03:13:18 PM »
It does.  I'm not saying it shows NB made the call just that it was entirely possible for him to have done so before any shots were fired. Jurors were misled over this in that they were told JB entered NB/June's bedroom and opened fire with NB sustaining the facial wounds there.  How could he then have made the phone call when the pathological evidence showed he was incapable of purposeful speech thereafter and had he attempted to put his mouth to the phone he would have transferred blood stains it.

The physical evidence at soc places NB on the landing stairs when he sustained his facial wounds so entirely possible he came up the stairs from the kitchen having made the call to JB.

They weren't misled, the defence could have brought that up at trial and didn't. It's basic commons sense to suggest that if a call was made, then it was clearly made before he was shot - his defence thought it best not to pursue - there must have been a reason.

It's also entirely possible that he pushed pass Bamber and there are other possibilities.

Offline Caroline

Re: The phone call
« Reply #292 on: February 21, 2020, 03:14:27 PM »
People usually run away from the person with the gun, so shooting them between the eyes would be difficult.

Hard to run away when you've been shot through the leg.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2020, 03:17:25 PM by Caroline »

Offline Caroline

Re: The phone call
« Reply #293 on: February 21, 2020, 03:20:48 PM »
Nevertheless it nullifies your attempt to suggest Caffell was still enamoured of Sheila, doesn't it? How do you know it was 'only sex'?

I'm not sure why you would need the opinion of someone from a forum when you have his own words either from his book or from interviews. No one knows how he felt better than he did/does.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: The phone call
« Reply #294 on: February 21, 2020, 03:32:30 PM »
They weren't misled, the defence could have brought that up at trial and didn't. It's basic commons sense to suggest that if a call was made, then it was clearly made before he was shot - his defence thought it best not to pursue - there must have been a reason.

It's also entirely possible that he pushed pass Bamber and there are other possibilities.

Lawyers are as capable as anyone of being incompetent and negligent especially if they had no prior experience of mass shooting which obviously they didn't.

Even MT QC at the 2002 appeal hearing has NB making the call after he sustained the upstairs gsw's.  His argument was an officer used the phone and inadvertently removed the blood stains.  This is clearly nonsense but illustrates another QC not on top of his brief.  Roll on 3rd appeal with a top notch QC like William Clegg.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Caroline

Re: The phone call
« Reply #295 on: February 21, 2020, 04:34:42 PM »
Lawyers are as capable as anyone of being incompetent and negligent especially if they had no prior experience of mass shooting which obviously they didn't.

Even MT QC at the 2002 appeal hearing has NB making the call after he sustained the upstairs gsw's.  His argument was an officer used the phone and inadvertently removed the blood stains.  This is clearly nonsense but illustrates another QC not on top of his brief.  Roll on 3rd appeal with a top notch QC like William Clegg.

In order to achieve a 3rd appeal there needs to be compelling new evidence and there is none.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The phone call
« Reply #296 on: February 21, 2020, 05:45:10 PM »
Hard to run away when you've been shot through the leg.

I think you need to tell Ispywithmybigeye, not me.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11235.msg575056#msg575056
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: The phone call
« Reply #297 on: February 21, 2020, 05:46:46 PM »
Lawyers are as capable as anyone of being incompetent and negligent especially if they had no prior experience of mass shooting which obviously they didn't.

Even MT QC at the 2002 appeal hearing has NB making the call after he sustained the upstairs gsw's.  His argument was an officer used the phone and inadvertently removed the blood stains.  This is clearly nonsense but illustrates another QC not on top of his brief.  Roll on 3rd appeal with a top notch QC like William Clegg.

Did Jeremy Bamber use Kingsley Napley all the way through?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: The phone call
« Reply #298 on: February 21, 2020, 06:21:18 PM »
In order to achieve a 3rd appeal there needs to be compelling new evidence and there is none.

But you're not privy to what is going on behind the scenes.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: The phone call
« Reply #299 on: February 21, 2020, 06:37:15 PM »
Did Jeremy Bamber use Kingsley Napley all the way through?

No.  When he was arrested and interviewed under caution he was represented by local solicitor Bruce Bowler.  Imo he might well have been served better by continuing with this solicitor.  I always thought it was his then girlfriend Anji Greaves who sought out David Napley's firm but Brett Collins said recently it was him.  Anyhow I understand from another barrister that it was the first case Napley's firm had taken on funded by legal aid and that this resulted in somewhat of an inferior service.  Post trial the appeals process swung into action with the same legal team.  Thereafter it has been all over the place with various players dipping in and out on a mainly pro nono basis resulting in a lack of proper management and oversight of the case.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?