The mccanns have never claimed to have been declared innocent.

[barrier]

It is a fact that the investigation was reopened, but the reasons weren't made public.

According to the media the Portuguese police spoke to the widow of a former employee of the Ocean Club, but whether that was due to a request from Op Grange or whether it was something the Portuguese police instigated isn't known.

Pedro do Carmo said the McCanns weren't suspects in 2017, which means that they weren't suspects. Whether he meant they weren't suspected or that they weren't formal suspects isn't known.

I thought Amaral told Mark Saunokonoko that Op Grange were interested in a German?

British barmaid was interviewed about her ex,he's German apparently.

[Vertigo Swirl]

IMO anyone seriously entertaining the idea that the McCanns are being investigated as suspects into their daughter's disappearance is sadly deluding themselves.  I know it's hard to come to terms with, but IMO you need to let it go and face reality.

[Wonderfulspam]

IMO anyone seriously entertaining the idea that the McCanns are being investigated as suspects into their daughter's disappearance is sadly deluding themselves.  I know it's hard to come to terms with, but IMO you need to let it go and face reality.

Well yes of course, because the reality is there's a multitude of evidence against other possible suspects, such as.....

Eucilides Montiero, because he's a black guy who once worked at the OC.

Robert Murat, because he used a mobile phone & lived near 5a.

Sergey Malinka, because he owned a lap top, phone & dumped an old sofa.

Some bogus charity collectors, because petty theives often steal kids.

A creepy looking man, because he was creepy looking.

Spotty man, because he was spotty & seen close to 5a.

Some barmaids ex boyfriend, because he's a hippy & hippies are renown for abducting kids.

The list is endless, you might even be a suspect yourself.

[Wonderfulspam]

Besides,

How could SY & the PJ go about investigating the McCanns exactly, other than by questioning them?

I can already predict what their answers would be.

Seriously, I'd love to know.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well yes of course, because the reality is there's a multitude of evidence against other possible suspects, such as.....

Eucilides Montiero, because he's a black guy who once worked at the OC.

Robert Murat, because he used a mobile phone & lived near 5a.

Sergey Malinka, because he owned a lap top, phone & dumped an old sofa.

Some bogus charity collectors, because petty theives often steal kids.

A creepy looking man, because he was creepy looking.

Spotty man, because he was spotty & seen close to 5a.

Some barmaids ex boyfriend, because he's a hippy & hippies are renown for abducting kids.

The list is endless, you might even be a suspect yourself.

your stupid sarcasm is very tiresome and incredibly childish, IMO.

[Wonderfulspam]

your stupid sarcasm is very tiresome and incredibly childish, IMO.

Personal attacks eh?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Besides,

How could SY & the PJ go about investigating the McCanns exactly, other than by questioning them?

I can already predict what their answers would be.

Seriously, I'd love to know.

So then you’ve just made the point - the McCanns are not being investigated, unless you seriously think £12m has been spent on tea and biscuits for a roomful of police detectives to sit on their arses watching daytime tv for the last 6 years, waiting for their chief suspects to call with a confession?

[Wonderfulspam]

So then you’ve just made the point - the McCanns are not being investigated, unless you seriously think £12m has been spent on tea and biscuits for a roomful of police detectives to sit on their arses watching daytime tv for the last 6 years, waiting for their chief suspects to call with a confession?

No, it's been spent on investigating ridiculous & far fetched dead ends if the press reports are anything to go by.

Which is hardly justifiable during the age of austerity imo.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Personal attacks eh?

Your argument is thus - the McCanns must be suspects because you’ve deemed that everyone else ever mentioned as possible suspects can’t really be suspects because in your opinion the McCanns dunnit.  That is not a very clear and logical argument, is it?

[Vertigo Swirl]

No, it's been spent on investigating ridiculous & far fetched dead ends if the press reports are anything to go by.

Which is hardly justifiable during the age of austerity imo.

Then you must agree with what I wrote, so why challenge it with your sarky list of suspects?

[Wonderfulspam]

Then you must agree with what I wrote, so why challenge it with your sarky list of suspects?

Because the abduction of MM is a joke in itself.

[Mr Gray]

Because the abduction of MM is a joke in itself.

no it isnt

[Wonderfulspam]

no it isnt

Yes it is.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Because the abduction of MM is a joke in itself.

It really doesn’t matter what your opinion is, in my opinion however, the McCanns are not suspects, which was my original point which you raged against impotently and illogically.

[Mr Gray]

Yes it is.

as its just the 5 min argument we'll have to agree to disagree