Author Topic: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies  (Read 55225 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #150 on: April 03, 2020, 09:54:07 AM »
Thank you, April — I have read so much it’s sometimes hard to keep track of everything without checking.

Regardless, it just shows how strict Nevill was about illegal drug taking, so that’s why I don't believe Sheila would have openly smoked cannabis inside the house at WHF. She’d have been far too fearful, and she respected and loved her dad dearly. And she wasn’t addicted to cannabis...she was an occasional recreational user if it, unlike Jeremy, who was known to smoke it constantly in company.
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #151 on: April 03, 2020, 10:16:36 AM »

Rather as you appear to have determined to become the self appointed saviour of his reputation. I wonder if you'd be adopting the same stance had your family have been the victims and you were denied a sentimental keepsake? I'm going to suggest that the only things which were "disappearing" were those requested by BC, and had Jeremy been working with him, he'd have known this.

I wouldn't have been asking for keepsakes on the day after a family member had been murdered, would you?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline APRIL

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #152 on: April 03, 2020, 11:18:24 AM »
I wouldn't have been asking for keepsakes on the day after a family member had been murdered, would you?


Whilst this isn't about us I concur that I'd have found doing so in bad taste, HOWEVER, if I'd seen the house being raped of what the late owners had held dear, I think any reticence would have flown out the window. C'mon, if he cared that little for it, other than it's value, what difference was one ring going to make?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #153 on: April 03, 2020, 11:54:27 AM »

Whilst this isn't about us I concur that I'd have found doing so in bad taste, HOWEVER, if I'd seen the house being raped of what the late owners had held dear, I think any reticence would have flown out the window. C'mon, if he cared that little for it, other than it's value, what difference was one ring going to make?

As far as I'm aware nothing had been removed from WHF by 8th August, when Ann asked about June's engagement ring.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline APRIL

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #154 on: April 03, 2020, 11:57:06 AM »
As far as I'm aware nothing had been removed from WHF by 8th August, when Ann asked about June's engagement ring.


It didn't need to have been if the intention to do so had been made clear.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #155 on: April 03, 2020, 01:11:22 PM »

It didn't need to have been if the intention to do so had been made clear.

Had the intention to do so been made clear?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Caroline

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #156 on: April 03, 2020, 01:17:12 PM »
I wouldn't have been asking for keepsakes on the day after a family member had been murdered, would you?

It wasn't the day after. Quite interesting how you have tried to deflect from the topic of the wallet to highlight the relatives. This is a common tactic of supporters. I'll ask again, how did Jeremy know where the wallet was ands having looked there, how did he know not to keep looking?

Offline Caroline

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #157 on: April 03, 2020, 01:18:44 PM »


You need to check, but my understanding is that it belonged to Nevill's nephew, Anthony Pargeter, who'd had a bit of a drug problem.

That is correct April.

Offline APRIL

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #158 on: April 03, 2020, 01:23:54 PM »
Had the intention to do so been made clear?


I suspect that silver, objets d'art, portraits, being removed/boxed up. may have given a clue.

Offline Caroline

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #159 on: April 03, 2020, 01:34:37 PM »
As far as I'm aware nothing had been removed from WHF by 8th August, when Ann asked about June's engagement ring.

It was 9th August and was part of a conversation where Jeremy states that he was having everything valued by Sotherbys.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #160 on: April 03, 2020, 02:37:46 PM »


You need to check, but my understanding is that it belonged to Nevill's nephew, Anthony Pargeter, who'd had a bit of a drug problem.

Nope. It seems those who keep correcting me are rather hazy themselves when it comes to the details. It was Anthony's half brother, Roland, who wasn't actually a relative at all, although he spent school holidays at WHF as did Anthony and Jacqueline.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline APRIL

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #161 on: April 03, 2020, 02:53:06 PM »
Nope. It seems those who keep correcting me are rather hazy themselves when it comes to the details. It was Anthony's half brother, Roland, who wasn't actually a relative at all, although he spent school holidays at WHF as did Anthony and Jacqueline.

It sounds as if others getting it wrong makes you feel smug?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #162 on: April 03, 2020, 03:46:11 PM »
It wasn't the day after. Quite interesting how you have tried to deflect from the topic of the wallet to highlight the relatives. This is a common tactic of supporters. I'll ask again, how did Jeremy know where the wallet was ands having looked there, how did he know not to keep looking?
Do you think you’ll ever get a sensible non-deflecting reply to this question?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #163 on: April 03, 2020, 06:14:32 PM »
It sounds as if others getting it wrong makes you feel smug?

It certainly doesn't encourage me to accept everything they say as fact.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies
« Reply #164 on: April 03, 2020, 06:54:23 PM »
It was 9th August and was part of a conversation where Jeremy states that he was having everything valued by Sotherbys.

Sorry, yes. the 9th. The same conversation during which Jeremy said nothing should be removed from the farmhouse; which was ignored. By what stretch of imagination was Ann Eaton within her rights to make off with Beatrice Bamber's jewellery?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0