Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies

[ISpyWithMyEye]

When you find it I'll believe it.

No you won’t.

Because even when you’re presented with the TRUTH you either say “it’s wrong” or “they’re lying”

Funny how you never suspect Jeremy of lying, and how strange that when his lies ARE exposed, you go all quiet 🤐

[G-Unit]

No you won’t.

Because even when you’re presented with the TRUTH you either say “it’s wrong” or “they’re lying”

Funny how you never suspect Jeremy of lying, and how strange that when his lies ARE exposed, you go all quiet 🤐

I think it's funny how you make many claims, but can rarely provide the evidence to support them.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

I think it's funny how you make many claims, but can rarely provide the evidence to support them.

You’re hilarious!

I post the truth; unlike you, who posts ridiculous assumptions that you’ve formed inside your head

[Miss Taken Identity]

You’re hilarious!

I post the truth; unlike you, who posts ridiculous assumptions that you’ve formed inside your head

I don't think that is quite fair Ispy. G will look and give cites to her claims, she will also have an opinion -same as everyone. I enjoy reading your posts,but I like verification as well on some points, it doesn't make me a bad person or JB lover, as it doesn't with G also.

[G-Unit]

You’re hilarious!

I post the truth; unlike you, who posts ridiculous assumptions that you’ve formed inside your head

Perhaps you could provide evidence of your "truths". You could start with these;

It's not been proved to be true that Colin Caffell spoke to the pathologist; that Jeremy Bamber asked the police to burn things; that Jeremy Bamber asked his sister to visit with her sons or that there were DNA tests carried out for the first trial.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

I don't think that is quite fair Ispy. G will look and give cites to her claims, she will also have an opinion -same as everyone. I enjoy reading your posts,but I like verification as well on some points, it doesn't make me a bad person or JB lover, as it doesn't with G also.

G-Unit doesn’t always cite her claims, MT — and  not all the so-called “evidence “ she provides is accurate.

I’ve read thousands of transcripts and there’s simply too many for me to hunt through

I could do, but it takes time and unless I feel it’s a really important point I don’t see the need of traipsing through everything to prove a point to someone who won’t believe the truth when they see it

These few women are brainwashed, and no amount of facts will change that

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Perhaps you could provide evidence of your "truths". You could start with these;

It's not been proved to be true that Colin Caffell spoke to the pathologist; that Jeremy Bamber asked the police to burn things; that Jeremy Bamber asked his sister to visit with her sons or that there were DNA tests carried out for the first trial.

So you’re calling Colin Caffell a liar, are you? That’s what he said in his book, and I believe him against your accusations simply because you don’t want to believe the truth.

You’re also calling the police liars, because they said JB asked them to burn everything, claiming it would upset him to see all the blood.

And he DEFINITELY asked Sheila more than once when she was bringing the twins  down...more than one person mentioned it. When I eventually find all these things I’ll post them, but I’ll do it at my time, as it’s hardly pressing is it?

As for the forensic testing, G-Unit, what don’t you understand about scientists establishing that the blood in the silencer was Sheila’s? They found 13 markers the first time, then years later they found 17 (out of 20), which meant anyone else having that same blood group was a trillion to one.

Your repetitive arguments that you want proof of is boring. I suggest you do research, but remember, your research is of no value because this was all verified 35 & 22 years by the courts, lawyers, jury, police, witnesses  and forensics.

[APRIL]

So you’re calling Colin Caffell a liar, are you? That’s what he said in his book, and I believe him against your accusations simply because you don’t want to believe the truth.

You’re also calling the police liars, because they said JB asked them to burn everything, claiming it would upset him to see all the blood.

And he DEFINITELY asked Sheila more than once when she was bringing the twi pans down...more than one person mentioned it. When I eventually find all these things I’ll post them, but I’ll do it at my time, as it’s hardly pressing is it?

As for the forensic testing, G-Unit, what don’t you understand about scientists establishing that the blood in the silencer was Sheila’s? They found 13 markers tye first time, then years later they found 17 (out of 20), which meant anyone else having that same blood group was a trillion to one.

Your repetitive arguments that you want proof is boring. I suggest you do research, but remember, your research is if no value because this was all verified 35 & 22 years by the courts, lawyers, jury, police, witnesses  and forensics.

Asking Sheila when she and the boys were next visiting the farm, is rather different from him issuing an invitation, which you claim he did. It also occurs to me that, in order to do so, and for others to hear, he would have needed to be in her company. Perhaps you can confirm this by providing evidence of him being in her company at some time, other than the housewarming party at which the chances were high that he already knew that she was visiting the next day.

[G-Unit]

So you’re calling Colin Caffell a liar, are you? That’s what he said in his book, and I believe him against your accusations simply because you don’t want to believe the truth.

You’re also calling the police liars, because they said JB asked them to burn everything, claiming it would upset him to see all the blood.

And he DEFINITELY asked Sheila more than once when she was bringing the twi pans down...more than one person mentioned it. When I eventually find all these things I’ll post them, but I’ll do it at my time, as it’s hardly pressing is it?

As for the forensic testing, G-Unit, what don’t you understand about scientists establishing that the blood in the silencer was Sheila’s? They found 13 markers tye first time, then years later they found 17 (out of 20), which meant anyone else having that same blood group was a trillion to one.

Your repetitive arguments that you want proof is boring. I suggest you do research, but remember, your research is if no value because this was all verified 35 & 22 years by the courts, lawyers, jury, police, witnesses  and forensics.

Still no evidence to uphold your claims though.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Asking Sheila when she and the boys were next visiting the farm, is rather different from him issuing an invitation, which you claim he did. It also occurs to me that, in order to do so, and for others to hear, he would have needed to be in her company. Perhaps you can confirm this by providing evidence of him being in her company at some time, other than the housewarming party at which the chances were high that he already knew that she was visiting the next day.

I shall try and find it, April

But I 100% definitely read that he asked Sheila when she was bringing the twins over. I can’t remember who overheard it, but someone definitely did.

In going to start taking screenshots and highlighting test on docs and books, otherwise this will be a full time job for me 😂

Please don’t think I’m being, funny, I know you only want me to do it so I can back up what I’ve seen 😊

[APRIL]

I shall try and find it, April

But I 100% definitely read that he asked Sheila when she was bringing the twins over. I can’t remember who overheard it, but someone definitely did.

In going to start taking screenshots and highlighting test on docs and books, otherwise this will be a full time job for me 😂

Please don’t think I’m being, funny, I know you only want me to do it so I can back up what I’ve seen 😊

In this case, Spy, I concur. I, too, have seen it said that he asked Sheila when she was next going to be at the farm, but THAT is very different from him issuing an invitation.

I will be honest. Reading "I 100% definitely read.........." followed/preceded by "I shall try and fine it", knowing, from experience, there's unlikely to be any follow up,has become a little tedious. However, I remain hopeful

[ISpyWithMyEye]

In this case, Spy, I concur. I, too, have seen it said that he asked Sheila when she was next going to be at the farm, but THAT is very different from him issuing an invitation.

I will be honest. Reading "I 100% definitely read.........." followed/preceded by "I shall try and fine it", knowing, from experience, there's unlikely to be any follow up,has become a little tedious. However, I remain hopeful

Oh, I mean to to find it , I do...but then I get distracted and forget. Sorry.

But I will hunt it down.

By the way, he didn’t invite the twins to WHF, he asked Sheila (more than once) when she’d be bringing them down, and someone found it odd why he seemed interested to know

I shall try and remember where I read/saw it...:)

[Caroline]

Oh, I mean to to find it , I do...but then I get distracted and forget. Sorry.

But I will hunt it down.

By the way, he didn’t invite the twins to WHF, he asked Sheila (more than once) when she’d be bringing them down, and someone found it odd why he seemed interested to know

I shall try and remember where I read/saw it...:)

Hi Spy, this does ring a bell with me also.

[APRIL]

Hi Spy, this does ring a bell with me also.

Which makes three of us. Was it in Colin's book? Was it something Julie overheard?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Which makes three of us. Was it in Colin's book? Was it something Julie overheard?

I shall try and find it...I’m logging off from here in a mo...I’ve done like a full day’s work 😂

It is so where, for sure :)