Is there any evidence which implicates Sheila?

[Brietta]

I don't think that was the reason.

Sorry, you've lost me ... you don't think that was the reason for what?

[The General]

Sorry, you've lost me ... you don't think that was the reason for what?

Why Jeremy had the dog euthaneraberercated ethanhawkerised euphimismered mesmerised killed.

[Brietta]

Why Jeremy had the dog euthaneraberercated ethanhawkerised euphimismered mesmerised killed.

As I thought, you appear to be misinterpreting my post for some reason best known to yourself.  I wish you would desist from playing games on this board as it is even more tiresome here than elsewhere.

[Caroline]

I think it was a particularly spiteful thing to do and I think it was done with malice.
Then what would you expect from a man who could massacre his family to concentrate on living the high life financed by doing so. 
He could have checked with other family members or friends if anyone was willing to take the animal on if he didn't want to, I'm sure someone would.

I completely agree - stipulating that it should be put down is completely spiteful.

[Caroline]

I don't think that was the reason.

So what in your opinion was the reason?

[Miss Taken Identity]

'I read (or saw on a recording by the officer) that Jeremy pointed up and said to the officers “I can see someone moving!'

----------

A source would be good.

It has always been very vague about who saw the 'trick of the light'.

Would a police man really create panic by suddenly saying he thought he saw something?

If it was Jeremy, it just makes him look more guilty and was part of his plan.

I am sure that was in the ITV Drama. when waiting around but standing back from the house. It was JB who said it,a policeman said he thought so too,but then someone mentioned it was light reflecting a shadow or something.

But let us say for argument sake. JB said I think I saw someone moving inside. who would this person be?


It can't be sheila she is dead already. Or if only half dead then she must have been using the silencer- which means after the fatal shot- she in her state of deadness hid the silencer.

Or could it be JB's accomplice?  why would he/she still be in the building and Why would JB  snitch on them- he would only be incriminated by the  accomplice.


I am more inclined to believe in JB playing smoke mirror look there- not here.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

'I read (or saw on a recording by the officer) that Jeremy pointed up and said to the officers “I can see someone moving!'

----------

A source would be good.

It has always been very vague about who saw the 'trick of the light'.

Would a police man really create panic by suddenly saying he thought he saw something?

If it was Jeremy, it just makes him look more guilty and was part of his plan.

I think you may find the source on YouTube

I shall try and look for you

[The General]

As I thought, you appear to be misinterpreting my post for some reason best known to yourself.  I wish you would desist from playing games on this board as it is even more tiresome here than elsewhere.

What? Tiresome? Is it now deary?
I told you. I answered the question.

[The General]

So what in your opinion was the reason?

Was the dog wearing a collar?

[Caroline]

Was the dog wearing a collar?

I'd assume so but really have no idea - why?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Mouth thrush can be the symptom from a course or two of anti bionics.

Yes it can, but he wasn’t on antibiotics

And mouth thrush is rare in adults (it’s more of a baby’s thing)

Most adults who get thrush are usually women and it’s in the vaginal area...and it’s rare for men to get thrush. Most men who contract thrush are gay men who catch it by practising unprotected oral sex

It will be on Google.

[The General]

I'd assume so but really have no idea - why?

Meh, nah, I thought it through. I thought maybe he was looking to dispose of it in case there was some incriminating forensic on it, but it's a non-starter. He could have took it at any time when with the vet if that were the case.
Maybe he did just do it out of sheer spite. Seems out of kilter though.

[APRIL]

Yes it can, but he wasn’t on antibiotics

And mouth thrush is rare in adults (it’s more of a baby’s thing)

Most adults who get thrush are usually women and it’s in the vaginal area...and it’s rare for men to get thrush. Most men who contract thrush are gay men who catch it by practising unprotected oral sex

It will be on Google.

Around 10 year ago I got oral thrush after I was given antibiotics for a chest infection. I now understand why babies scream when they get it.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Meh, nah, I thought it through. I thought maybe he was looking to dispose of it in case there was some incriminating forensic on it, but it's a non-starter. He could have took it at any time when with the vet if that were the case.
Maybe he did just do it out of sheer spite. Seems out of kilter though.

Out of kilter for Jeremy to be spiteful?  After murdering his entire family?  A strange observation if I may say so.

[The General]

Out of kilter for Jeremy to be spiteful?  After murdering his entire family?  A strange observation if I may say so.

No, out of kilter from the plan. If he was trying to not look callous and psychopathic then surely he lets the dog get adopted or sent to rescue or something.