Is there any evidence which implicates Sheila?

[G-Unit]

You are hell bent on making an excuse for him aren't you?

An excuse in your eyes, an explanation in mine.

[Vertigo Swirl]

An excuse in your eyes, an explanation in mine.

You’re someone who finds the idea of an adult swearing in front of a child worthy of note in another case, you find it “strange” and you imply it says something about the person’s character yet you don’t seem to think there is anything to see here, move along, move along, just because Bamber had his mother’s beloved pet dog put down within hours of her murder is of no significance whatsoever.  I wonder if you would be so forgiving if such an action had been committed by someone else, who you are suspicious of...

[Caroline]

You’re someone who finds the idea of an adult swearing in front of a child worthy of note in another case, you find it “strange” and you imply it says something about the person’s character yet you don’t seem to think there is anything to see here, move along, move along, just because Bamber had his mother’s beloved pet dog put down within hours of her murder is of no significance whatsoever.  I wonder if you would be so forgiving if such an action had been committed by someone else, who you are suspicious of...

I completely agree, it's double standards and hypocritical - it really doesn't matter what G wants to call it - she provides excuse on excuse. She's not alone mind, many supporters do the same thing to the point where it gets a bit embarrassing.

[steve_trousers]

I completely agree, it's double standards and hypocritical - it really doesn't matter what G wants to call it - she provides excuse on excuse. She's not alone mind, many supporters do the same thing to the point where it gets a bit embarrassing

It’s an endless circle of child like denial, they can’t see that others see straight through their flannel. Their antics are a complete embarrassment, not least to Jeremy Bamber himself, who can barely conceal his disgust for their stupidity, I’m sure he must have come to believe they are part of his punishment which is why he frequently turns on them.
It’s the kind of boorish troll behaviour that gives forums in general a bad name and understandably puts off decent folk from commenting who might otherwise have something to add to the discussion.

[G-Unit]

It’s an endless circle of child like denial, they can’t see that others see straight through their flannel. Their antics are a complete embarrassment, not least to Jeremy Bamber himself, who can barely conceal his disgust for their stupidity, I’m sure he must have come to believe they are part of his punishment which is why he frequently turns on them.
It’s the kind of boorish troll behaviour that gives forums in general a bad name and understandably puts off decent folk from commenting who might otherwise have something to add to the discussion.

Forums exist so people can discuss matters which interest them. Different opinions are to be expected and I accept that. What I find incomprehensible is why some people choose to question the motives and character of those who disagree with them. It's that which fits the definition of troll behaviour.

Perhaps those who know everything about the case and about Jeremy Bamber's character could explain why he didn't shoot the dog when he apparently had the means and opportunity?

[APRIL]

Forums exist so people can discuss matters which interest them. Different opinions are to be expected and I accept that. What I find incomprehensible is why some people choose to question the motives and character of those who disagree with them. It's that which fits the definition of troll behaviour.

Perhaps those who know everything about the case and about Jeremy Bamber's character could explain why he didn't shoot the dog when he apparently had the means and opportunity?

Because Jeremy didn't intend the shootings to look as if he'd done them. They looked, as he'd intended they should, to appear to have been carried out by Sheila, and Sheila wouldn't have shot the dog.

[Holly Goodhead]

Oh so you believe Julie now? OK! Had he made such an attempt, why did he tell the vet NOT to rehome? And if he did ask the relatives, did he tell them that he would have the dog put down f he didn't find it a home?

As far as JM/Crispy goes she referred to the family and PB insofar as JB asked if they wanted Crispy, so her version of events could be corroborated.  Her version of events re JB murdering his family was either shown to be wrong or it wasn't possible to corroborate.

I don't know what JB supposedly told the vet because I've not even seen a wit stat from the vet.

Other than those here I've not seen anyone anywhere condemn JB for having Crispy put down.

[Holly Goodhead]

The vet said he was asked not to rehome and there is no evidence the dog bit him - thought you didn't speculate?

Can you upload the vet's wit stat please?

[Nicholas]

As far as JM/Crispy goes she referred to the family and PB insofar as JB asked if they wanted Crispy, so her version of events could be corroborated.  Her version of events re JB murdering his family was either shown to be wrong or it wasn't possible to corroborate.

I don't know what JB supposedly told the vet because I've not even seen a wit stat from the vet.

Other than those here I've not seen anyone anywhere condemn JB for having Crispy put down.

Even though it made headline news?

White House Farm viewers distressed as the Bamber family dog is put down
https://www.standard.co.uk/stayingin/tvfilm/white-house-farm-bamber-dog-put-down-a4335726.html

White House Farm: Viewers horrified as Jeremy Bamber has healthy dog put down
https://www.entertainmentdaily.co.uk/tv/white-house-farm-viewers-horrified-over-dog-death/

[Myster]

Can you upload the vet's wit stat please?

[Holly Goodhead]

Because Jeremy didn't intend the shootings to look as if he'd done them. They looked, as he'd intended they should, to appear to have been carried out by Sheila, and Sheila wouldn't have shot the dog.

If JB committed the murders on what basis would sparing Crispy lend to SC?

[Nicholas]

If JB committed the murders on what basis would sparing Crispy lend to SC?

He didn’t spare Crispy!

[G-Unit]

Because Jeremy didn't intend the shootings to look as if he'd done them. They looked, as he'd intended they should, to appear to have been carried out by Sheila, and Sheila wouldn't have shot the dog.

I think you're giving him more credit than is due.

[Myster]

After shooting Sheila he couldn't be bothered reloading the empty magazine again and searching for Crispy under the bed. Besides, pushed for time, he had more important things to do such as riding home and phoning the police.

[Holly Goodhead]

Thanks.