Author Topic: Sheila’s Nightdress  (Read 30401 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #15 on: April 09, 2020, 01:14:13 PM »
There's no evidence the perp ever came into close contact with the victims whether it be to inflict the gsw's or the non gsw's NB sustained.

Venezis indicates that Nevill was possibly punched in the face - there is evidence.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #16 on: April 09, 2020, 03:10:56 PM »

Surely, fibres and hairs would have been looked for and tested???  In the days before DNA was used in forensic testing, fibres would have been very important??

I haven't seen any evidence that they were.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #17 on: April 09, 2020, 03:13:45 PM »

Not finding any isn't indicative of there being none.

Either they didn't look or they looked and didn't find, so there's no evidence either way.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #18 on: April 09, 2020, 03:16:05 PM »
The beating with the rifle butt came after a couple of GSW's I assume? There's no way, in my opinion, a woman of her stature could inflict such a wound to Nevil without him being incapacitated in some way. even logistically, rifle butt to head of a man over 6ft tall.
While he was on all fours or scrabbling around trying to get up, yes, possible, but again, in my opinion, not for a relatively slight woman to perpetrate in a double handed jabbing motion, it would have to be a double handed swing to attain enough momentum - and such a blow is relatively easy to evade  / block when not incapacitated.


Indeed, and there would be some blood splats on Sheila's night dress from that'manic' attack.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #19 on: April 09, 2020, 03:32:42 PM »
There's no evidence the perp ever came into close contact with the victims whether it be to inflict the gsw's or the non gsw's NB sustained.

That is because the 'evidence' was removed/cleaned.

"I know a few people suggest that Sheila did “ritual bathing” after supposedly killing her parents and her beloved little sons, but Nevill didn’t take a bath, so why didn’t they find any fibres of Sheilas nightdress on him? Nor ONE of her hairs? "

Why would she take a bath and hide evidence if she was deranged on a slaughter trip and was going to kill herself.  Fact:  people in the mindset before committing suicide are NOT thinking rationally.

 Hmm wheres me gloves and apron must do a clean up here before I Shoot myself - twice!


I also question the extreme violence used to slaughter innocent people by a timid depressed female.

My guess, I am allowed to guess,  if she was going to kill anyone ,especially her children, she would use a less violent means  perhaps poison.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Caroline

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #20 on: April 09, 2020, 09:24:52 PM »
There's no evidence the perp ever came into close contact with the victims whether it be to inflict the gsw's or the non gsw's NB sustained.

Vanezis was under the impression that Nevill was punched in the face - I think that's pretty close.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #21 on: April 09, 2020, 09:38:39 PM »
That’s exactly what the police officer said, April

He said, and I quote:  “He certainly made Nevill and June suffer”

He must have released all his lent-up psychopathic hate in that attack. He even viciously beat Nevill AFTER he was dead.

But back to my question, considering  such force was used and a struggle definitely took place, resulting in Nevill’s pyjamas falling down, its blatantly obvious that fibres from Sheila’s nightdress would have been on those pyjamas and probably  in his hair too. Forensics absolutely love head hair for some reason...

So why wasn’t ANY of her nightdress fibres on Nevill? Not even one single hair of hers which WOULD have shed in such a violent struggle?
Do you not think it’s possible that his pyjama bottoms were pulled down deliberately after death as the final humiliation?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline APRIL

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #22 on: April 09, 2020, 09:43:06 PM »
Do you not think it’s possible that his pyjama bottoms were pulled down deliberately after death as the final humiliation?


Undoubtedly.

Offline John

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #23 on: April 09, 2020, 10:48:05 PM »
That’s exactly what the police officer said, April

He said, and I quote:  “He certainly made Nevill and June suffer”

He must have released all his lent-up psychopathic hate in that attack. He even viciously beat Nevill AFTER he was dead.

But back to my question, considering  such force was used and a struggle definitely took place, resulting in Nevill’s pyjamas falling down, its blatantly obvious that fibres from Sheila’s nightdress would have been on those pyjamas and probably  in his hair too. Forensics absolutely love head hair for some reason...

So why wasn’t ANY of her nightdress fibres on Nevill? Not even one single hair of hers which WOULD have shed in such a violent struggle?

Because Sheila is completely innocent and had nothing to do with the murders.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #24 on: April 10, 2020, 08:49:16 AM »
As we all know, Nevill was beaten in the kitchen.

We all know Jeremy Bamber was found guilty at his trial in 1986

However, a few people seem to think it was Sheila who beat Nevill in the kitchen.

My question is: why wasn’t ONE trace of Sheila on Nevill’s body?

Not one hair, not one drop of her blood, no broken fingernail, and not ONE single fibre from her light blue nightdress.

Nevill wore dark blue pyjamas which were taken to forensics along with Sheila’s nightdress. So why didn’t they find ONE fibre of her nightdress on Nevill?

I know a few people suggest that Sheila did “ritual bathing” after supposedly killing her parents and her beloved little sons, but Nevill didn’t take a bath, so why didn’t they find any fibres of Sheilas nightdress on him? Nor ONE of her hairs?

I don't think SC had a "ritual bath".  I think her found state is entirely consistent with her as the perp.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline barrier

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #25 on: April 10, 2020, 08:56:18 AM »
I don't think SC had a "ritual bath".  I think her found state is entirely consistent with her as the perp.

How many crime scenes have you seen to be able to determine that?
« Last Edit: April 10, 2020, 09:00:32 AM by barrier »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #26 on: April 10, 2020, 08:59:40 AM »
I don't think SC had a "ritual bath".  I think her found state is entirely consistent with her as the perp.
At least one of the attending police officers was surprised by her found state - how do you account for that?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline The General

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #27 on: April 10, 2020, 10:38:43 AM »
That is because the 'evidence' was removed/cleaned.

"I know a few people suggest that Sheila did “ritual bathing” after supposedly killing her parents and her beloved little sons, but Nevill didn’t take a bath, so why didn’t they find any fibres of Sheilas nightdress on him? Nor ONE of her hairs? "

Why would she take a bath and hide evidence if she was deranged on a slaughter trip and was going to kill herself.  Fact:  people in the mindset before committing suicide are NOT thinking rationally.

 Hmm wheres me gloves and apron must do a clean up here before I Shoot myself - twice!


I also question the extreme violence used to slaughter innocent people by a timid depressed female.

My guess, I am allowed to guess,  if she was going to kill anyone ,especially her children, she would use a less violent means  perhaps poison.
I don't think you need to look any further than this post for discounting Sheila.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Caroline

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #28 on: April 10, 2020, 12:58:04 PM »
Do you not think it’s possible that his pyjama bottoms were pulled down deliberately after death as the final humiliation?

This is also my thought.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #29 on: April 10, 2020, 01:10:57 PM »
I don't think you need to look any further than this post for discounting Sheila.

What would you expect to find on SC's nightdress as perp? 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?