Author Topic: Sheila’s Nightdress  (Read 30391 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #135 on: April 28, 2020, 07:42:17 PM »
She wasn't his mother.

Maybe that's why he found it so easy to shoot her 7 times in cold blood.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #136 on: April 28, 2020, 07:57:00 PM »
I was discussing Ann Eaton's supposed feelings.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Caroline

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #137 on: April 28, 2020, 08:32:28 PM »
I was discussing Ann Eaton's supposed feelings.

You were commenting on his relationship (or lack there of) with June.

Offline Common sense

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #138 on: April 28, 2020, 08:34:29 PM »
I was discussing Ann Eaton's supposed feelings.

I was discussing JB taking a possible psychopathic delight in causing further misery by having Crispy put down.

If it didn't upset AE maybe he liked the thought of June watching his callous disregard for her memory from the afterlife.

Apart from destroying the evidence, maybe that's why he had them cremated too, taking some twisted pleasure in imagining their reaction.

Also he was showing how he was in control with the power of life and death ( I'm the boss now - like his suit )

Offline Caroline

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #139 on: April 28, 2020, 09:09:08 PM »
I was discussing JB taking a possible psychopathic delight in causing further misery by having Crispy put down.

If it didn't upset AE maybe he liked the thought of June watching his callous disregard for her memory from the afterlife.

Apart from destroying the evidence, maybe that's why he had them cremated too, taking some twisted pleasure in imagining their reaction.

Also he was showing how he was in control with the power of life and death ( I'm the boss now - like his suit )

I agree - one last kick in the teeth.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #140 on: April 28, 2020, 10:19:09 PM »
I was discussing JB taking a possible psychopathic delight in causing further misery by having Crispy put down.

If it didn't upset AE maybe he liked the thought of June watching his callous disregard for her memory from the afterlife.

Apart from destroying the evidence, maybe that's why he had them cremated too, taking some twisted pleasure in imagining their reaction.

Also he was showing how he was in control with the power of life and death ( I'm the boss now - like his suit )


You said "I'm not sure if how it was depicted in the ITV drama is accurate or not, but maybe Bamber enjoyed upsetting Ann Eaton by having Crispy put down."
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11337.msg586478#msg586478

That is what I replied to, by pointing out that she never mentioned being upset afaik.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Caroline

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #141 on: April 28, 2020, 10:25:00 PM »

You said "I'm not sure if how it was depicted in the ITV drama is accurate or not, but maybe Bamber enjoyed upsetting Ann Eaton by having Crispy put down."
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11337.msg586478#msg586478

That is what I replied to, by pointing out that she never mentioned being upset afaik.

It's catching!  8)--))

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #142 on: April 28, 2020, 10:35:45 PM »
A woman scorned is just as likely to give up the secrets she has been carrying as to make up a maliscious lie.

Sure, JM had a motive to bury JB but what did she have against MM? What if he hadn't had alibi?

It seems to me far more likely that she only named MM because that's what JB told her while feeding her a lot of other misinformation in the process.


It’s ridiculous for anyone to think a young woman would accuse her ex-boyfriend of such a heinous, heinous crime just because he supposedly ended the relationship. She wouldn’t have accused him of something as serious as that!

Besides losing him altogether and never being able to get back with him, she would have been charged with perjury and ended up in prison herself.

And she certainly wouldn’t have said Jeremy told her MM did it and get him put away too!

She knew things about the murders, including Jeremy’s means of entry that she could have possibly known unless Jeremy had told her.

His CT try to make out Julie was mad enough to say all that, but they can never answer how she knew things only Jeremy knew about the murders. It’s also been twisted by Jeremy, who claims he dumped her, but it was actually she who walked away from HIM. Yes, she was upset at the brutal way he treated her, and she was once in love with him so she was hurt too, but this “scorned woman” rumour isn’t actually accurate.
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #143 on: April 28, 2020, 10:41:47 PM »
Incidentally, Holly said on another thread which I can’t find, that Jeremy had never been abusive or violent.

That’s not true.

Julie said how he twisted her arm up behind her back when they arguing, and besides the pain as he kept it twisted he terrified her by how he stared at her and what he said, so much so, that she feared he might kill her too.

No wonder she walked away from him and was put in a safe house.
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline Common sense

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #144 on: April 28, 2020, 11:41:07 PM »

You said "I'm not sure if how it was depicted in the ITV drama is accurate or not, but maybe Bamber enjoyed upsetting Ann Eaton by having Crispy put down."
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11337.msg586478#msg586478

That is what I replied to, by pointing out that she never mentioned being upset afaik.

To which I replied, perhaps he

To which I replied:

Maybe he enjoyed the thought of his mother being upset.

Seem we just got our wires crossed G Unit  8((()*/

(I'll have to practice with the quote thing!)
« Last Edit: April 28, 2020, 11:43:56 PM by Common sense »

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Total likes: 802
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #145 on: April 28, 2020, 11:42:00 PM »
Incidentally, Holly said on another thread which I can’t find, that Jeremy had never been abusive or violent.

That’s not true.

Julie said how he twisted her arm up behind her back when they arguing, and besides the pain as he kept it twisted he terrified her by how he stared at her and what he said, so much so, that she feared he might kill her too.

No wonder she walked away from him and was put in a safe house.


Put in a safe house where?  I thought she was at college.

Offline Common sense

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #146 on: April 28, 2020, 11:45:45 PM »
Incidentally, Holly said on another thread which I can’t find, that Jeremy had never been abusive or violent.

That’s not true.

Julie said how he twisted her arm up behind her back when they arguing, and besides the pain as he kept it twisted he terrified her by how he stared at her and what he said, so much so, that she feared he might kill her too.

No wonder she walked away from him and was put in a safe house.

There is also the time they had a fight in the supermarket and hit each other on the nose, according to his police interview.

Offline Common sense

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #147 on: April 28, 2020, 11:50:16 PM »

It’s ridiculous for anyone to think a young woman would accuse her ex-boyfriend of such a heinous, heinous crime just because he supposedly ended the relationship. She wouldn’t have accused him of something as serious as that!

Besides losing him altogether and never being able to get back with him, she would have been charged with perjury and ended up in prison herself.

And she certainly wouldn’t have said Jeremy told her MM did it and get him put away too!

She knew things about the murders, including Jeremy’s means of entry that she could have possibly known unless Jeremy had told her.

His CT try to make out Julie was mad enough to say all that, but they can never answer how she knew things only Jeremy knew about the murders. It’s also been twisted by Jeremy, who claims he dumped her, but it was actually she who walked away from HIM. Yes, she was upset at the brutal way he treated her, and she was once in love with him so she was hurt too, but this “scorned woman” rumour isn’t actually accurate.

I am sure there is a thread for discussing JM in depth somewhere but I agree with all you say.

She told the police how she had put a pillow over his face so that he would stay with her forever and also told the police all about her own crimes. Her WS all have the ring of truth to me and seem to be a young woman getting a lot off her chest. She could have made up much more damaging claims if she was really intent on framing him.

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #148 on: April 29, 2020, 12:02:34 AM »

Put in a safe house where?  I thought she was at college.


After Julie confessed to police what Jeremy had told her and done, they put her in a safe house. And they were right to. Jeremy was bailed and immediately tried to look for Julie to speak to her...I doubt very much he’d have harmed her as he was already up to his neck in it, but he’d have tried to manipulate her and begged her to withdraw her statement.
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Sheila’s Nightdress
« Reply #149 on: April 29, 2020, 12:17:57 AM »

After Julie confessed to police what Jeremy had told her and done, they put her in a safe house. And they were right to. Jeremy was bailed and immediately tried to look for Julie to speak to her...I doubt very much he’d have harmed her as he was already up to his neck in it, but he’d have tried to manipulate her and begged her to withdraw her statement.

He’d already manipulated her but would have carried on manipulating her

As he did with Anji and Virginia Greaves
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation