I agree so ether the alerts were not to cadaver or the mccanns lied. SY appera to think the alerts were not to a cadaver in taht case.
I agree with you there are certain possibilities such as those but, more than just those two. It is also possible the McCanns did lie about timing and the cadaver scent alerts correct but an abductor killed her.
Smaller bodies can develop cadaver scent more quickly apparently.
I found this report of a podcast. From the Daily Star I know, so not a great source but interesting if this former judge agrees there is too little evidence to link Bruckner. I presume the podcast is German, so might be hard to track down.
"Dr Fischer, a former federal judge, said he did not believe German police had incontrovertible evidence she had been killed.
He said: "You don't know whether the child is dead or not.
"There are certain plausibilities that derive from criminal experience but which I think are spread with a certain unpleasant undertone also by the investigative authorities.
"If the public prosecutor knew more, they would say more."
Dr Fischer went on to say he was skeptical the case was about to be solved and unconvinced the police have enough evidence to prosecute.
"There is a clear evidence base, but no compelling evidence,” he said.
"It would be a mistake to commit yourself too early and to say that he was there, he has a criminal record, he doesn't say anything, he must have been."
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/breaking-german-prosecutor-madeleine-mccann-22159295Edit - I found the original podcast, in German, so no idea how accurate the transcript above is.
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://www.swr.de/swr2/leben-und-gesellschaft/podcast-sprechen-wir-ueber-mord-100.html&prev=search