New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Eleanor]

They are certainly taking their time as they've been working on their final lead since 2015 with nothing to show for it.

The PJ have been working on it since 2007.  Have they got anything to show for it?

[kizzy]

Where's the proof the Germans not involved..

What, Where is your proof he was - IMO it's going to fizzle out like all the other leads.

[Mr Gray]

What matters is that they have to prove that the German was with MM never mind abduct and killed her.

All this prove they didn't is plain stupid.... It's necessary to prove the mccanns we're involved... Not that it had to be proved they weren't.  I doubt the police would have said so much if they didn't have some evidence... But we will wait and see

[Vertigo Swirl]

The PJ said the same in August 2007.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1560595/Madeleine-McCann-assumed-dead.html

Please stop being silly.  Thank you.

[Mr Gray]

What, Where is your proof he was - IMO it's going to fizzle out like all the other leads.

May or may not... You cling on to your belief the mccanns are involved... I find that ridiculous

[Vertigo Swirl]

No that’s feeble. The dogs don’t lie and research shows them to be highly accurate . If they are irrelevant and they false alert all over the place then statistically the chances of false alerts to items linked to only one family would be millions to one surely... and we’re talking two dogs not one! There has to be a better explanation than “irrelevant” I’m afraid in order to explain what would be an implausible and statistically nigh on impossible coincidence. I’m afraid for me there must be a scientific explanation out there.

I find it amusing that sceptics seem willing to let go of the idea that the McCanns hid their child’s body but they simply cannot and will not come to terms with the possibility that their beloved dogs were wrong. 

[Wonderfulspam]

The PJ have been working on it since 2007.  Have they got anything to show for it?

Not Maddie that's for sure, and that in it's self is evidence she wasn't abducted.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If you are a sceptic and are now considering the possibility that Madeleine was killed by the German paedo in the Apartment  in order to explain the dog alerts, perhaps you can also explain the dog alerts that to the Scenic, Kate McCann’s trousers and the child’s t-shirt. 

[Eleanor]

Not Maddie that's for sure, and that in it's self is evidence she wasn't abducted.

No it isn't.

[Wonderfulspam]

No it isn't.

Yes it is.

[pathfinder73]

From Mark Williams-Thomas.

That is pathetic and wasting police time. They've wasted enough time!

[jassi]

Us sceptics are considering the possibility of Brueckner having killed Madeleine because on the face of it, he is a feasible suspect.
However, to date,no evidence has been produced that links him to Madeleine so we don't need to ponder dog alerts outside of 5A until then.

[Wonderfulspam]

Us sceptics are considering the possibility of Brueckner having killed Madeleine because on the face of it, he is a feasible suspect.
However, to date,no evidence has been produced that links him to Madeleine so we don't need to ponder dog alerts outside of 5A until then.

I'm not.

[Eleanor]

Yes it is.

Hardly.  Unless you aren't very bright.

[jassi]

I'm not.

good for you 

Perhaps I should have said 'some sceptics'