New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[The General]

I'm a bit incredulous that the lawyer who is on record as saying he would allow his client to watch his dog but not his daughter is still intent - in my opinion - on dropping him in it every time he opens his mouth.

I think he is desperate to know what evidence the prosecutor has which is not surprising as I think he has none.

You could be right there.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Exercising rigor is a sign of incompetence to you?
Explains a lot.

rigor1
/ˈrɪɡɔː,ˈrʌɪɡɔː,ˈrʌɪɡə/
nounMEDICINE
noun: rigor; plural noun: rigors
a sudden feeling of cold with shivering accompanied by a rise in temperature, often with copious sweating, especially at the onset or height of a fever.

Or perhaps you meant rigour?

[G-Unit]

The unthinkable has happened and there has been an investigation which has systematically followed evidence doggedly despite the FOI requests, the campaigns, the letters to MPs, the petitions and every other and any device possible to derail it.

As a result we are now where we are and in my opinion closer than we ever have been to finding out what happened to Madeleine McCann.

The vibes I am getting from some recent posts is that the possible resolution of Madeleine's case does not meet with the general approval one would have expected.

I think that is very sad and very telling.

I don't know what happened to Madeleine McCann, but I've seen no evidence that CB was in Luz on 3rd May, or that if he was he was stealing a child from a holiday apartment.

Until I do I'll leave it to those more easily convinced than me to get excited by the media hype and speculation triggered by the appeal for information released in June.

Not because I don't want the case solved, but because I don't know what evidence Wolters is keeping secret. All I do know is it's insufficient to convict CB.

[Mr Gray]

I don't know what happened to Madeleine McCann, but I've seen no evidence that CB was in Luz on 3rd May, or that if he was he was stealing a child from a holiday apartment.

Until I do I'll leave it to those more easily convinced than me to get excited by the media hype and speculation triggered by the appeal for information released in June.

Not because I don't want the case solved, but because I don't know what evidence Wolters is keeping secret. All I do know is it's insufficient to convict CB.

What we know is enough to suspect CB....and HCW has  said he has enough evidence to show his suspect killed MM....to write that off as nothing is ridiculous imo

I'm certainly not easily convinced about anything ....things have to be supported by evidence

[barrier]

I don't know what happened to Madeleine McCann, but I've seen no evidence that CB was in Luz on 3rd May, or that if he was he was stealing a child from a holiday apartment.

Until I do I'll leave it to those more easily convinced than me to get excited by the media hype and speculation triggered by the appeal for information released in June.

Not because I don't want the case solved, but because I don't know what evidence Wolters is keeping secret. All I do know is it's insufficient to convict CB.

What would be even worse is it nerves gets to court through lack of evidence,what then for OG,you cannot continually search for what doesn't exist.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't know what happened to Madeleine McCann, but I've seen no evidence that CB was in Luz on 3rd May, or that if he was he was stealing a child from a holiday apartment.

Until I do I'll leave it to those more easily convinced than me to get excited by the media hype and speculation triggered by the appeal for information released in June.

Not because I don't want the case solved, but because I don't know what evidence Wolters is keeping secret. All I do know is it's insufficient to convict CB.

And in the meantime keep on researching the files for evidence of wrong-doing by Kate and Gerry, and discussing the same old tired tropes over and over again, yes we get it.

[Anthro]

It seems his lawyer has accepted that Brueckner was the recipient of the call to Luz as he has based his argument on it;  maybe he will be able to tell the police who phoned him - I don't think it would have taken thirty minutes for a wrong number. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8833977/Madeleine-McCann-suspects-lawyer-says-phone-records-prove-innocence.html

I agree, Brietta. It is interesting that Fulscher positions Brückner as Wolters has suggested i.e in the vicinity of apartment 5A. I also think 90 seconds is plausible to take a child from her bed, given that Brückner may have known the layout of the apartment or was already in the apartment.

[G-Unit]

rigor1
/ˈrɪɡɔː,ˈrʌɪɡɔː,ˈrʌɪɡə/
nounMEDICINE
noun: rigor; plural noun: rigors
a sudden feeling of cold with shivering accompanied by a rise in temperature, often with copious sweating, especially at the onset or height of a fever.

Or perhaps you meant rigour?

Rigour (UK) or rigor (US) describes a condition of stiffness or strictness. Rigour frequently refers to a process of adhering absolutely to certain constraints, or the practice of maintaining strict consistency with certain predefined parameters.
Wikipedia

[Mr Gray]

I agree, Brietta. It is interesting that Fulscher positions Brückner as Wolters has suggested i.e in the vicinity of apartment 5A. I also think 90 seconds is plausible to take a child from her bed, given that Brückner may have known the layout of the apartment or was already in the apartment.

I dont think we have to assume the window was 90 secs

[Robittybob1]

Your interpretation...no actual alibi.
The fact he hadn't claimed an alibi which would conclusively prove his innocence strongly suggests to me that he has no alibi

Well you had better define what is an alibi.

[Robittybob1]

Imo FF is a very poor lawyer who has verified nothing. What sort of reputation does he have as a defence lawyer. It's quite possible CB has had to scrape the bottom of the barrel

That is libel if I ever I've seen one.  FF in your description = possibly "the bottom of the barrel".   Defamation case coming up IMO.

[Anthro]

The PJ files contain this re. Russians.

[Mr Gray]

That is libel if I ever I've seen one.  FF in your description = possibly "the bottom of the barrel".   Defamation case coming up IMO.

have you read what has been said about HCW by several posters...do you understand the defamation law

[jassi]

While an alibi would be helpful, it is for the prosecution to prove he was in 5A, not for Brueckner to prove that he wasn't.

[Mr Gray]

Well you had better define what is an alibi.

I think most understand the word