New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Anthro]

With the exception of one post and giving "likes" I have been excluded from forum for getting on for ?more than 6 weeks, (like Lace was.)

Hiya Kizzy

Excluded, so I never thanked you for your many kindnesses and the compassion you showed me when I had my breakdown a few weeks ago.   You and Faith were very perceptive noticing what was happening to me and it was good to have such solid support.  Thank you (both) so much. XXX 
I have stopped crying now.

[Thanks also go to Anthro, VS and Rob (who bore with me by telephone)]


Now I am going to argue with you, which is what you would expect from me, I expect, when I disagree.

Amaral proved that he did not do a good job, most especially with the Joana Cipriana case.

To approve torture of Leonor and bring the DCCB in from Lisbon, IIRC, to do it, then to produce a lying document to present to Court is sufficient to show what sort of man he is.  Ruthless, comes to mind.  Because of this document he is now a Criminal and we all know that we cannot trust him.

I could list a great long list of awful things he did, both in The Madeleine case and The Joana case, but I don't think it is necessary …. unless you want them re-exposed to the World?


TBH, I wondered if he had some motive for behaving as he did ?  Maybe I am wrong and maybe I am right ?
Time may tell

💕

[G-Unit]

With the exception of one post and giving "likes" I have been excluded from forum for getting on for ?more than 6 weeks, (like Lace was.)

Hiya Kizzy

Excluded, so I never thanked you for your many kindnesses and the compassion you showed me when I had my breakdown a few weeks ago.   You and Faith were very perceptive noticing what was happening to me and it was good to have such solid support.  Thank you (both) so much. XXX 
I have stopped crying now.

[Thanks also go to Anthro, VS and Rob (who bore with me by telephone)]


Now I am going to argue with you, which is what you would expect from me, I expect, when I disagree.

Amaral proved that he did not do a good job, most especially with the Joana Cipriana case.

To approve torture of Leonor and bring the DCCB in from Lisbon, IIRC, to do it, then to produce a lying document to present to Court is sufficient to show what sort of man he is.  Ruthless, comes to mind.  Because of this document he is now a Criminal and we all know that we cannot trust him.

I could list a great long list of awful things he did, both in The Madeleine case and The Joana case, but I don't think it is necessary …. unless you want them re-exposed to the World?


TBH, I wondered if he had some motive for behaving as he did ?  Maybe I am wrong and maybe I am right ?
Time may tell

I find the mention of the DCCB very interesting and would like to know why you think Amaral was able to 'bring them in'? They were brought into the McCann investigation too, but not by Amaral. He is quite clear in his book that he didn't make the decision to bring them in and learned of it only when they arrived with Luis Neves, who then directed the investigation with Encarnacao.

[kizzy]

That is a typical Amaral apologist statement.

LOL......well so be it - but I would rather be a G.A. apologist - than a mcc apologist.

[kizzy]

Just as he was right in releasing confidential information which he shouldn't have been privy to in the first instance anyway, which led to Brueckner and the investigation centred on him, being announced.

Just as he was right in his attempt to derail the German investigation by releasing false information regarding Brueckner's vehicle.

Just as he was right to promote Brueckner's falsified, dreadlocked image to deliberately mislead the public.

Why do you think he was right to do any of that?

Ill tell you what I think ...it seems you have as much contempt for GA as I have for the mccs

The only difference here it seems is that it was the mccs who who left maddie to her fate.   not GA.

[Vertigo Swirl]

LOL......well so be it - but I would rather be a G.A. apologist - than a mcc apologist.

That’s your choice, but personally I have more sympathy and support for the parents of missing children than dodgy ex-policemen who exploit them for a living instead..

[kizzy]

That’s your choice, but personally I have more sympathy and support for the parents of missing children than dodgy ex-policemen who exploit them for a living instead..

IMO your supporting the ones who started this exploitation of their daughter in the first place

Not only when they left her but by going after GA giving him constant publicity

Other wise  he would have been long gone - they created the interest in him by trying to ruin him.

Also his life the way -  I believe they did Maddie's.

that everyone seems to have jumped on the band wagon.

[Vertigo Swirl]

IMO your supporting the ones who started this exploitation of their daughter in the first place

Not only when they left her but by going after GA giving him constant publicity

Other wise  he would have been long gone - they created the interest in him by trying to ruin him.

Also his life the way -  I believe they did Maddie's.

that everyone seems to have jumped on the band wagon.

Whether the McCanns had “gone after” Amaral or not, he made hundreds of thousands of pounds by exploiting Madeleine’s disappearance for his own personal enrichment.  That is a fact.  To say that the McCanns created interest in Amaral is arrant nonsense IMO.  They did not book him slots on national TV, nor find him a publisher, normarrange for him to be interviewed by the press every time there is a new development in the case.

[kizzy]

Whether the McCanns had “gone after” Amaral or not, he made hundreds of thousands of pounds by exploiting Madeleine’s disappearance for his own personal enrichment.  That is a fact.  To say that the McCanns created interest in Amaral is arrant nonsense IMO.  They did not book him slots on national TV, nor find him a publisher, normarrange for him to be interviewed by the press every time there is a new development in the case.

If they had not gone after him I believe no one would have bothered who he was or been interested in interviewing him at all.

The promoted the book and GA with publicity that money could not buy, trying to ruin his thinking they woiuld ban his book and him.

But failed miserably and lost the case....leaving him free to say what he likes - and what he thinks.

Well their fund it seems didn't do to bad either VS.

[Mr Gray]

If they had not gone after him I believe no one would have bothered who he was or been interested in interviewing him at all.

The promoted the book and GA with publicity that money could not buy, trying to ruin his thinking they woiuld ban his book and him.

But failed miserably and lost the case....leaving him free to say what he likes - and what he thinks.

Well their fund it seems didn't do to bad either VS.

I don't think he is free to say what he likes and what he thinks. If he does he may well end up back in court. You might not have noticed he's been saying very little re the McCanns for the last 3 years

[Vertigo Swirl]

If they had not gone after him I believe no one would have bothered who he was or been interested in interviewing him at all.

The promoted the book and GA with publicity that money could not buy, trying to ruin his thinking they woiuld ban his book and him.

But failed miserably and lost the case....leaving him free to say what he likes - and what he thinks.

Well their fund it seems didn't do to bad either VS.

They went after him AFTER he made a fortune out of the book and tv documentary so once again you are talking complete nonsense imo.

[G-Unit]

They went after him AFTER he made a fortune out of the book and tv documentary so once again you are talking complete nonsense imo.

Someone seemed to think he had 1.2 million euros in his back pocket, unless that claim was designed to encourage him to settle out of court for less when they offered him that option.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Someone seemed to think he had 1.2 million euros in his back pocket, unless that claim was designed to encourage him to settle out of court for less when they offered him that option.

That has got nothing to do with my point.

[G-Unit]

That has got nothing to do with my point.

Your point being that they waited until he'd made enough money to make it worth suing him?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Your point being that they waited until he'd made enough money to make it worth suing him?

No that was not my point.

[The General]

I don't think he is free to say what he likes and what he thinks. If he does he may well end up back in court. You might not have noticed he's been saying very little re the McCanns for the last 3 years

In public