New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Robittybob1]

Do you think that is something they needed to deny, having already denied having anything to do with Madeleine’s disappearance?

Not the same thing IMO.  "already denied having anything to do with Madeleine’s disappearance" <> "never denied there was a cadaver in 5A".   (<> is a symbol meaning "does not equal")

[Mr Gray]

Have the McCanns ever denied there had been a cadaver in 5A?

Why should they... There is no evidence there was. What the mccanns have said is the alerts are not reliable... And I think even Grime would have to admit that after eddie alerted to a coconut

[Robittybob1]

Why should they... There is no evidence there was. What the mccanns have said is the alerts are not reliable... And I think even Grime would have to admit that after eddie alerted to a coconut

And I'd agree.  An alert is not an identification of who was the source of the alert.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Not the same thing IMO.  "already denied having anything to do with Madeleine’s disappearance" <> "never denied there was a cadaver in 5A".   (<> is a symbol meaning "does not equal")

I think the first statement makes the secomd statement entirely redundant, unless you think there is any possible scenario in which the McCanns could claim a) not to have had any involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance and b) admit the presence of a cadaver in their holiday apartment.

[Robittybob1]

I think the first statement makes the secomd statement entirely redundant, unless you think there is any possible scenario in which the McCanns could claim a) not to have had any involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance and b) admit the presence of a cadaver in their holiday apartment.

That was the solution I discovered.  This does not mean CB is not involved because the above solution only applies to what happened in the apartment and not what has happened to Madeleine from 9:45 PM onward.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That was the solution I discovered.  This does not mean CB is not involved because the above solution only applies to what happened in the apartment and not what has happened to Madeleine from 9:45 PM onward.

you’ve lost me.

[Robittybob1]

you’ve lost me.

I believe once Madeleine got out on the road anyone could abduct her.   If CB was in the area it could well have been him. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Once Madeleine got out on the road anyone could abduct her.   If CB was in the area it could well have been him.

What has that got to do with your question "have the McCanns denied there was a cadaver in Apartment 5a?"

[Eleanor]

I believe once Madeleine got out on the road anyone could abduct her.   If CB was in the area it could well have been him.

Not logical.  This entire case hinges on logic.  It wasn't some sort of mischance.  It was planned by someone, although I doubt that it was planned by Brueckner.

[Robittybob1]

What has that got to do with your question "have the McCanns denied there was a cadaver in Apartment 5a?"

They (the McCanns) reckon Madeleine is alive, and they have never denied there was a cadaver in apartment 5A.  How can there be a cadaver in 5A and Madeleine still alive?   Could someone have set them up?  Now IMO that is a possibility.

Not logical.  This entire case hinges on logic.  It wasn't some sort of mischance.  It was planned by someone, although I doubt that it was planned by Brueckner.

Was it planned or was it just mischance?  Could one part be planned and other parts mischance?

[Vertigo Swirl]

They (the McCanns) reckon Madeleine is alive, and they have never denied there was a cadaver in apartment 5A.  How can there be a cadaver in 5A and Madeleine still alive?   Could someone have set them up?  Now IMO that is a possibility.
Was it planned or was it just mischance?  Could one part be planned and other parts mischance?

Why should the McCanns need to deny there was a cadaver in Apartment 5a when they have stated categorically they had nothing to do with Madeleine's disappearance?  You're not making any sense IMO.

[Robittybob1]

Why should the McCanns need to deny there was a cadaver in Apartment 5a when they have stated categorically they had nothing to do with Madeleine's disappearance?  You're not making any sense IMO.

I think you have to accept they are two different issues.

The McCanns had nothing to do with Madeleine's disappearance and
The cadaver in 5A was not their doing either.  Who put it there and who took it away, that is the mystery.

Madeleine could have been easily abducted from the road leading to the Tapas Restaurant.

[Eleanor]

They (the McCanns) reckon Madeleine is alive, and they have never denied there was a cadaver in apartment 5A.  How can there be a cadaver in 5A and Madeleine still alive?   Could someone have set them up?  Now IMO that is a possibility.
Was it planned or was it just mischance?  Could one part be planned and other parts mischance?

No, no mischance.  That child vanished off the face of the earth.  This was more likely if she is still alive and living under a different name.  Dead bodies have a nasty habit of turning up.

[Eleanor]

I think you have to accept they are two different issues.

The McCanns had nothing to do with Madeleine's disappearance and
The cadaver in 5A was not their doing either.  Who put it there and who took it away, that is the mystery.

Madeleine could have been easily abducted from the road leading to the Tapas Restaurant.

Presuming she was on the road in the first place and that no one saw this.

[G-Unit]

Im sure amaral believes Maddie died in an accident and there is proof... Like most sceptics.. They think of all crazy ideas to try and explain why they are not being prosecuted.. M15... Friends in high places... Elite paedophile rings... Gerry could bring the govt down.. Its all rubbish

Whatever anyone believes, there's still been no proof disclosed showing what happened on 3rd May 2007. It's all belief-based imo.