New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Brietta]

Lets bring you up to date, twelve months on he's hardly a  new suspect, it'll fizzle out before you know it, I'm sure  the empty vessel in your little part of the world is sounding loud and clear.

One whom they have apparently been investigating for some years.  So it really does look as if they are quite determined to do their best for Madeleine.

Perhaps an examination of conscience might give you an inkling as to why that might cause a little chagrin in some quarters 😁

[Robittybob1]

The McCanns dont think Mafdie is alive.. They think theres a
Remote possibility shes alive..
They think the alerts are unreliable.. Ad I do and there never was a cadaver in 5a. The alerts have been totally misrepresented imo..

I heard Gerry say "cadaver dogs are unreliable"  but none of the other assertions.

[Wonderfulspam]

I heard Gerry say "cadaver dogs are unreliable"  but none of the other assertions.

Indeed, I've never once heard him mention Mafdie.

[Robittybob1]

Indeed, I've never once heard him mention Mafdie.

You could be right.  I'll have to listen harder.

[barrier]

One whom they have apparently been investigating for some years.  So it really does look as if they are quite determined to do their best for Madeleine.

Perhaps an examination of conscience might give you an inkling as to why that might cause a little chagrin in some quarters 😁

It'll emerge in the fullness of time after investigating CB for three yrs they had nothing so named him in the hope or desperation that by revealing they had a named suspect something would turn up, boy did it ever, Wolters shook the tree and all that fell was detritus,borne  out by 12 months of nonsense in the press.The legend is writ.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It'll emerge in the fullness of time after investigating CB for three yrs they had nothing so named him in the hope or desperation that by revealing they had a named suspect something would turn up, boy did it ever, Wolters shook the tree and all that fell was detritus,borne  out by 12 months of nonsense in the press.The legend is writ.

You think they would spend four years investigating a man if they had nothing? i

[Brietta]

It'll emerge in the fullness of time after investigating CB for three yrs they had nothing so named him in the hope or desperation that by revealing they had a named suspect something would turn up, boy did it ever, Wolters shook the tree and all that fell was detritus,borne  out by 12 months of nonsense in the press.The legend is writ.

The "legend was writ" in 2007.

It took until 2013 for it to be put back on track.  Only now in 2021 does it appear that we are getting extremely close to the fact of the matter.

But not content with a powerful investigation into Madeleine's abduction perhaps bearing fruit ~ the legend writer just cannot tear himself away from embellishing the legend he created.

Why did Amaral feel it necessary to crawl out from under the same rock that Brueckner did when it was upturned by the Germans, to embellish his original legend from dogs and poisonous Calpol with yet more fantastic legend of painted wagons and a dreadlocked patsy.

Instead of concentrating on the original legend manufactured and promoted by Amaral ~ why don't you put your thinking cap on and give some consideration to his present antics of attempting to manufacture another,

As far as I can see regarding his deliberate and well publicised misdirection, he was caught out in the lie before it became the stuff of legend and the investigation into Madeleine's case and who knows what else is continuing apace and not side tracked as it was in 2007.

All we have to do is wait.  Spare some thought to the other victims we know about and the many we certainly don't and ponder how many may have suffered due to Amaral writing his legend and the legend being unreservedly believed.

[barrier]

Instead of concentrating on the original legend manufactured and promoted by Amaral ~ why don't you put your thinking cap on and give some consideration to his present antics of attempting to manufacture another,

Two things to that show me where I concentrate on the original supposed legend.  Wolters created the legend of his suspect doing for Madeleine , and after 4 yrs , b....r all to show for it.

[barrier]

You think they would spend four years investigating a man if they had nothing? i

Just for you, lets say Wolt is right and CB was actually on his dog and bone in the general area, why couldn't he have been there for a totally innocent and unrelated reason ? which seems to be borne out with out any progress from concrete some 12 months ago.

[Mr Gray]

Just for you, lets say Wolt is right and CB was actually on his dog and bone in the general area, why couldn't he have been there for a totally innocent and unrelated reason ? which seems to be borne out with out any progress from concrete some 12 months ago.

Not any where near as bad as Amaral who claims the parents dun it... 14 years no progress...

[barrier]

Not any where near as bad as Amaral who claims the parents dun it... 14 years no progress...

You're has bad with the incessant love of all things Amaral.

[Brietta]

Two things to that show me where I concentrate on the original supposed legend.  Wolters created the legend of his suspect doing for Madeleine , and after 4 yrs , b....r all to show for it.

You are concentrating on a series of fallacies for your promotion of your absurd "legend".  Wolters and the German investigation are ploughing their way through the evidence some of which may still be uncontaminated with the 'legend' made up by your troubadour.

My lips involuntarily curl into a sneer at mention of Amaral and Wolters in the same breath - Amaral isn't fit to lick Wolter's shoe.  What is it that you are missing about Amaral purposely laying a false trail away from the prime suspect in an abducted child case by publishing a faked up photograph.

Witnesses are still coming forward and are still being investigated.  Why do you think Amaral did what he did because it most certainly was nothing that was aimed at furthering the German case.
Don't you think it suspicious? - or do you think it is just Amaral doing what he does best during a missing child investigation by botching the case.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Just for you, lets say Wolt is right and CB was actually on his dog and bone in the general area, why couldn't he have been there for a totally innocent and unrelated reason ? which seems to be borne out with out any progress from concrete some 12 months ago.

He could have been, who has said otherwise?  It’s what the police are investigating, do you think they shouldn’t bother checking out a known paedophile / rapist / burglar who happened to be in the near vicinity of a child that has gone missing? One who allegedly confessed to the crime to a mate?   Nah, police should have ignored it like the Portuguese police did, far more professional .

[barrier]

He could have been, who has said otherwise?  It’s what the police are investigating, do you think they shouldn’t bother checking out a known paedophile / rapist / burglar who happened to be in the near vicinity of a child that has gone missing? One who allegedly confessed to the crime to a mate?   Nah, police should have ignored it like the Portuguese police did, far more professional .

Its all built on the telling of his bestest mate over a pint, that's probably where the notion of a photo came from,CB saying I've got a photo  too, Wolters has been searching for four years, you can't find what isn't there to be found.

[barrier]

You are concentrating on a series of fallacies for your promotion of your absurd "legend".  Wolters and the German investigation are ploughing their way through the evidence some of which may still be uncontaminated with the 'legend' made up by your troubadour.

My lips involuntarily curl into a sneer at mention of Amaral and Wolters in the same breath - Amaral isn't fit to lick Wolter's shoe.  What is it that you are missing about Amaral purposely laying a false trail away from the prime suspect in an abducted child case by publishing a faked up photograph.

Witnesses are still coming forward and are still being investigated.  Why do you think Amaral did what he did because it most certainly was nothing that was aimed at furthering the German case.
Don't you think it suspicious? - or do you think it is just Amaral doing what he does best during a missing child investigation by botching the case.

Its not my legend,Wolters is the writer.Perhaps you ought leave the case far behind you if it's that emotionally draining to mention Amaral.