New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Wonderfulspam]

I dont have to see it to judge whether it exists.
I haven't seen the covid virus but I know it exists

That's because there's evidence of corona virus.

What evidence is there of this paedo photo?

[Wonderfulspam]

Wait, don't tell me, something Wolters said.

[barrier]

Wait, don't tell me, something Wolters said.

It's akin  to the fibre nonsense, fertile imaginations.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's akin  to the fibre nonsense, fertile imaginations.

Wolters has said there are no fibres but he has said that there is concrete evidence that would leave you in little doubt of CB’s involvement.  So, do you think he’s telling the truth about the former but lying about the latter?

[Wonderfulspam]

Wolters has said there are no fibres but he has said that there is concrete evidence that would leave you in little doubt of CB’s involvement.  So, do you think he’s telling the truth about the former but lying about the latter?

We know he doesn't have dna or fibres, because if he did no amount of alibi for May 3rd could counter either.

We just have to take his word for it that there's an abundance of other concrete evidence.
Just like we have to take SY & the McCanns word for it that Maddie was definitely abducted.

No, I'll pass thanks.

So it's Wolters move now & he's not bringing charges.

Make of that what you will.

[Wonderfulspam]

Wolters said something along the lines of, if we saw the evidence he had we'd be left in no doubt.

But he clearly believes that if a court saw the evidence there would be room for reasonable doubt.

He thinks the public are all gullible plebs compared to court judges.

He might have a point there, considering so many people still believe that Maddie was abducted.

[Mr Gray]

Wolters said something along the lines of, if we saw the evidence he had we'd be left in no doubt.

But he clearly believes that if a court saw the evidence there would be room for reasonable doubt.

He thinks the public are all gullible plebs compared to court judges.

He might have a point there, considering so many people still believe that Maddie was abducted.

I. think it's you who is the gullible pleb for believing all the anti McCann propaganda

[Wonderfulspam]

I. think it's you who is the gullible pleb for believing all the anti McCann propaganda

Oooh, touchy. Care to reference any propaganda that I believe in?

[Mr Gray]

Oooh, touchy. Care to reference any propaganda that I believe in?

You are convinced the McCanns are guilty.. What do you base that belief on

[Wonderfulspam]

You are convinced the McCanns are guilty.. What do you base that belief on

The total absence of tangible, credible, verifiable abduction evidence.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You are convinced the McCanns are guilty.. What do you base that belief on

good question.  Where's all the concrete evidence of their guilt and what has made 3 police forces completely blind to it?  Are they all thick, or in the pay of higher masters protecting the evil doctors?  Gotta be an explanation...

[Wonderfulspam]

good question.  Where's all the concrete evidence of their guilt and what has made 3 police forces completely blind to it?  Are they all thick, or in the pay of higher masters?  Gotta be an explanation...

Don't need any, the absence of credible abduction evidence is enough for any reasonable person to come to the conclusion something else must have happened.

[Mr Gray]

The total absence of tangible, credible, verifiable abduction evidence.

So no real evidence of their involvement yet you are convinced of their involvement.. How do you think that would stand up in court

[Wonderfulspam]

So no real evidence of their involvement yet you are convinced of their involvement.. How do you think that would stand up in court

I never said it would.

[Mr Gray]

I never said it would.

So your bekief in the McCann's guilt is not based on any real evidence