New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Eleanor]

Wolters is in possession of all the evidence & is 100% convinced by it that Brueckner murdered Maddie &, if only you could see the evidence you'd be equally convinced by it.

Why do you doubt him?  That's just crazy thinking, you must think the BKA are all idiots.

Guess what?  I don't really care.  Beyond the fact that Brueckner must have travelled through France on several occasions on his way to Germany.

Whether or not The BKA are idiots is really not that important.  But they ain't so daft that they can't keep him locked up for a while yet.  And quite legitimately.

Brueckner is now the total responsibility of The Germans.  On their heads be it if he ever goes free.  Do you think The Germans don't know this?

[Mr Gray]

Whatever they do or might have doesn't carry sufficient weight to pursue a prosecution against either Brueckner or anyone else.

Whatever they might have leaves space for reasonable doubt, whilst simultaneously being 100% convincing, apparently.

I've explained how it's possible to be 100% sure of someones guilt but unable to prosecute.
I know 100% someone stole from be but CPS say not enough evidence to prosecute

[Wonderfulspam]

Guess what?  I don't really care.  Beyond the fact that Brueckner must have travelled through France on several occasions on his way to Germany.

Whether or not The BKA are idiots is really not that important. But they ain't so daft that they can't keep him locked up for a while yet.  And quite legitimately.

Brueckner is now the total responsibility of The Germans.  On their heads be it if he ever goes free.  Do you think The Germans don't know this?

Unimportant? It's outright illogical, you'd have to concede that Wolters was utterly wrong or even lying for your people trafficking theory to be plausible, right?

I'm surprised the other supporters never pull you up on this glaring discrepancy, it's quite absurd & is totally at odds with the concrete evidence.

[Wonderfulspam]

I've explained how it's possible to be 100% sure of someones guilt but unable to prosecute.
I know 100% someone stole from be but CPS say not enough evidence to prosecute

But Wolters does have enough evidence to bring charges, according to him, he said so nearly two years ago.

He's strengthened his case even further since then, he said so the other week, if you believe him.

That must be why he isn't bringing charges, the more evidence you obtain the less admissible it becomes.

At least, that's the only way I can make sense of it.

[Eleanor]

Unimportant? It's outright illogical, you'd have to concede that Wolters was utterly wrong or even lying for your people trafficking theory to be plausible, right?

I'm surprised the other supporters never pull you up on this glaring discrepancy, it's quite absurd & is totally at odds with the concrete evidence.

What on earth are you talking about?  Brueckner is locked up and will stay so.  I don't care about what Germany will do to him.

Brueckner is now their ball game.

[Wonderfulspam]

What on earth are you talking about?  Brueckner is locked up and will stay so.  I don't care about what Germany will do to him.

Brueckner is now their ball game.

And it's Wolters to serve, but he's been standing at the baseline for the past two years, clutching the ball very tightly to his chest & refusing to serve it to Brueckner.

Umpires call,  Brueckner wins by default.

[Eleanor]

And it's Wolters to serve, but he's been standing at the baseline for the past two years, clutching the ball very tightly to his chest & refusing to serve it to Brueckner.

Umpires call,  Brueckner wins by default.

If Brueckner ever goes free.  At least in the next thirty years.

How many more sexual assaults against children will there be?  Another Rape is looking likely.

[Wonderfulspam]

If Brueckner ever goes free.  At least in the next thirty years.

How many more sexual assaults against children will there be?  Another Rape is looking likely.

Well they can't keep him in indefinitely, he only got 7 years.

He can pretty much do what he wants after that, unless, until, they can nail him for raping that Hazel woman or masturbating in front of a girl on the beach.

But he won't be serving time for the abduction & murder of Maddie anytime soon so we can forget that.

[Eleanor]

Well they can't keep him in indefinitely, he only got 7 years.

He can pretty much do what he wants after that, unless, until, they can nail him for raping that Hazel woman or masturbating in front of a girl on the beach.

But he won't be serving time for the abduction & murder of Maddie anytime soon so we can forget that.

The Rape and The Sexual Abuse will do for now.  Both of which he has committed in the past.

[Wonderfulspam]

The Rape and The Sexual Abuse will do for now.  Both of which he has committed in the past.

Let he without sin cast the first stone.

7 years from a maximum of 15 seems a little lenient for a violent rape, & people complain about Portugal.

I wonder what his mitigation was.

[jassi]

Let he without sin cast the first stone.

7 years from a maximum of 15 seems a little lenient for a violent rape, & people complain about Portugal.

I wonder what his mitigation was.

First offence ?

[Wonderfulspam]

First offence ?

No, he already had previous for theft, drug dealing & molestation by then.

[jassi]

No, he already had previous for theft, drug dealing & molestation by then.

First rape conviction though

[Wonderfulspam]

The Mirror are going with Brueckner being a paying customer while his accomplice did the more complicated abducting part now. I'm still not sure where the Russians fit into all of this.

Madeleine McCann snatched by accomplice who sold her to suspect, prosecutor suggests

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/madeleine-mccann-snatched-accomplice-who-26900867

[faithlilly]

The Mail's latest theory....

Brueckner abducted Maddie, sold her to child traffickers, then bought her back from them & murdered her.

Madeleine McCann prosecutors probe whether missing girl was killed after being abducted and sold to child trafficking gang

Prosecutors are investigating the possibility Madeleine McCann was killed after being abducted and sold to a child trafficking gang.

Hans Christian-Wolters made the revelation in a Portuguese TV interview just days after revealing to MailOnline he had ‘new evidence’ against prime suspect Christian Brueckner.

Convicted rapist and paedophile Brueckner, 45, was identified as the man responsible for her abduction and ‘murder’ by German authorities in June 2020.

Since then they have been building a case against him but no charges have been brought – fuelling speculation the case against him is crumbling away and there will be no end to the 15 year mystery.

Portuguese TV reporter Sandra Felgueiras during her Sabado show on CMTV, asked Mr Wolters:’ So, you don’t believe that she was sold ?’

To which he replied: ‘I am not allowed to speak about these details,’ but when pressed and asked ‘if this was a possibility?’ he answered:’ Maybe it’s a possibility,’ without denying it.

The possibility that Madeleine was kidnapped to order for a child trafficking gang has been mooted before but there has never been any real elements to back the theory up.

Five years ago former Scotland Yard officer Colin Sutton suggested a ‘kidnap to order’ was the most likely and credible scenario for her disappearance.

However Mr Wolters insists they have ‘significant new evidence’ against him but ‘not forensic evidence’ and are adamant Brueckner is the man responsible.

Madeleine vanished from her parents Kate and Gerry’s holiday apartment in Praia da Luz on Portugal’s Algarve coast in May 2007 and despite numerous ‘sightings’ no trace of her has ever been found.

The show once again highlighted Brueckner’s relationship with fellow German Nicole Fehlinger and suggested they carried out the kidnap together.

But Mr Wolters denied this theory and said:’ We have checked this out. It is not part of our enquiry.’

He added:’ I can only say that at the moment we have only one suspicious person and that is Christian, there is no other person for us who is suspicious.’

When pressed as to when there would be a conclusion to the case Mr Wolters said: ‘The public and the McCanns have the right that we investigate seriously and that we only say something about the case when we are sure.'

‘He added: 'We are sure that he is the murderer of Madeleine McCann.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10792017/Madeleine-McCann-prosecutors-probe-killed-sold-traffickers.html

If trafficking is involved then surely Busching is a better fit?